Does he seriously think that 99% of their population was armed?
Makes total sense. I can see little 16 month old toddlers armed with rifles, wearing an ammo belt, a bandana, and war paint like Baby Rambo fighting Geth.
That's not what I said. It's just Deinons atempt at distorting my arguments and substituting what was said, with something that makes less sense to make his arguments sound more plausible. I said famine and diseases played a large role, in adition to a population who took up arms against the Geth as ordered by their Leaders.
Initialy his argument was that it was just as bad if the Geth let the babies and children and civilians starve intentionaly. Then in the next iteration it was changed into arming 99% of the population.
It's however the typical route of political argumentation. An atempt to make it sound like the otherside made claims that were never made.
Still, if someones parents used a gun agaisnt the Geth and the Geth killed them, then it's not far fetched that the kid might panic and try and pickup the gun in an atempt to defend itself. Or the kid might run away, hide in a cave, get pneumonia and starve. Given the weakness of Quarian health and their immunesystem they would be far more suceptible to such condition than humans who had 20-40% of populations die from such conditions, often without a war to worry about.
Mortalityrates are a lot higher in human populations with weakened immunesystem, old people and people who have starved or had other diseases or medical conditions.
The Quarian health conditions are extreme. Now add a war with bullets, chemical, nuclear and perhaps even biological weapons and things will deteriorate quickly.
Also, people seem to get me wrong, I'm not saying the Geth never did anything moraly wrong, but I'm saying I think the quarians were first at everything escalating things and they were ten times worse.
The Quarians were the ones who sat the standards of the conflict. They brought it on themselves. I'm sure it's a sad sobstory for all those poor and stupid people who trusted their leaders and their ideals. But just because they ended up loosing from their gamble doesn't mean anything. They atempted genocide, they never really regreted it, except the part about failing.
It's kind of liek the Rachni war, the Rachni attacked everyone and started killing people. Then the Krogans were uplifted and drafted to fight the Rachni. The Krogans then hunted the Rachni to extinction. Most people were happy that the Rachni were stopped and a statue was erected even if a few were concerned that the whole Rachni species was exterminated.
The statue was erected after the Krogan rebelions however to show that the council hadn't forgotten about the past.
The Rachni were genociding their way through the galaxy, the krogans hunted them to extinction through a massive genocide and became heroes, albeit with a stigma for killing every last Rachni.
Like the Rachni the Quarians tried to genocide 100% of the Geth species, but they in turn were brought down to a fall, they wern't however persued across the whole galaxy, merely stopped from being a thread to continued Geth survival. The Quarians never surrendered or atempted a peace, their argument was that you can't reason with a machine so it was never atempted on a government level.
At the same time a synthetic can't negotiate with someone who doesn't belive it's possible and rather picks up a gun to shoot at them.
Given that the Galaxy seemed content at letting the Geth stay in the Perseus Veil their isolationism worked well for them. Until the Reapers showed up. If the Reapers hadn't existed then Isolationinism wasn't really hurting them. The problem arrised when a problem that was to big for anyone to deal with on their own arrised.
It's not something the Geth could have accounted for 290 years earlier or 200 years earlier. Basicly, the isolationism was desired by both the Geth and the Council. Neither side wanted to risk arrousing the hornets nest.
The Geth were secretly spying and interacting with organics, and organics were secretly spying on the Geth. Each trying to understand the other.
No side can ever come out of a war and claim they never did anything moraly questionable. Unless ofcourse one side is killed off before they can react.