"facepalm dude"? Come on. I'm not your enemy. Just talk. I didn't commit some great atrocity here, did I?
I'm saying if Sebastian is in that quest, then he knows the full story.
It isn't during quest it was before varic quest in act 2 and that isn't what sebastion condemn varric it was for his revenge , anger and that he don't want forget about it. There is nothing about idol not that they knew that could be cause.
That there is hardly condemnation.
Anyway, I'm done here. The maturity has sunk too low now.
Please just discuss next time instead of using name calling and stupidity slurs.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
It isn't during quest it was before varic quest in act 2 and that isn't what sebastion condemn varric it isn't his revenge , anger and that he don't want forget about it. There is nothing about idol not that they knew that could be cause.
Hmm.. maybe I'll have to play it again then. I thought Sebastian talks to Varric at the moment you finally beat Bartrand in battle. In which case, you've already heard Bartrand's rants and that other dwarf servant telling a little of what happened.
That there is hardly condemnation.
Anyway, I'm done here. The maturity has sunk too low now.
Please just discuss next time instead of using name calling and stupidity slurs.
i see that we dramatically try change argument when previous failed and proved to be wrong.
Yes there is that is whole point of this conversation sebastion don't agree with varric desire for revenge...
It isn't during quest it was before varic quest in act 2 and that isn't what sebastion condemn varric it was for his revenge , anger and that he don't want forget about it. There is nothing about idol not that they knew that could be cause.
Why the hell do you ruin every thread you're in?? Just about everytime I've seen you in a thread I like, it goes to hell because of your extremist views and inablitiy to see things from anyone else's point of you. Get a reality check and stop talking down to people like you're so much better then they are.
Why the hell do you ruin every thread you're in?? Just about everytime I've seen you in a thread I like, it goes to hell because of your extremist views and inablitiy to see things from anyone else's point of you. Get a reality check and stop talking down to people like you're so much better then they are.
Oh stop crying dude im pointing the turth like it or not you can always ignore me... i don't have to i would like that everyone knew who hypocrite is sadly isn't in case...
Oh stop crying dude im pointing the turth like it or not you can always ignore me... i don't have to i would like that everyone knew who hypocrite is sadly isn't in case...
1. Not a dude. 2. You're not pointing out any truth, you're shoving your opinion of a character down everyone else's throats. Just because you think he is one, doesn't a. make him automatically one and b. doesn't make everyone else believe it. Not everyone thinks like you do (and thank god for that).
1. Not a dude. 2. You're not pointing out any truth, you're shoving your opinion of a character down everyone else's throats. Just because you think he is one, doesn't a. make him automatically one and b. doesn't make everyone else believe it. Not everyone thinks like you do (and thank god for that).
1.Whatever point stand still...
2.Yes im pointing truth i told already who hypocrite is and it match to sebastian he is one like it or not it is truth not an opinion.Not everyone have to but there are facts that you need accept and that is truth as i said like it or no he is one as he match description...
1.Whatever point stand still...
2.Yes im pointing truth i told already who hypocrite is and it match to sebastian he is one like it or not it is truth not an opinion.Not everyone have to but there are facts that you need accept and that is truth as i said like it or no he is one as he match description...
No...it is not a truth. Truth would mean irrefutable, so would fact. The point of this is that it's your opinion, which by definition is not a damn fact.
No...it is not a truth. Truth would mean irrefutable, so would fact. The point of this is that it's your opinion, which by definition is not a damn fact.
It is fact as i said he meets the conditions of being hypocrite...
I can point at man with mustache and tell that he have mustache it will be fact not my opinion and you can cry that he doesn't have mustache but it sill will be fact that man have mustache like it or no...
Everyone has different interpretations of a character's actions, so it is an opinion.
Well sure, Hawke could be the Princess of Starkhaven. That won't stop her from not appearing in Dragon Age: Inquisition. Being the King of Ferelden certainly didn't stop the Hero from not appearing in Dragon Age II.
Everyone has different interpretations of a character's actions, so it is an opinion.
Character sat down interpretation character sat down
Someone interpretation character sings...
Fact character sat down
Is that some sort of nursery rhyme? It makes no sense.
Is that some sort of nursery rhyme? It makes no sense.
Eee nope but it won't if you refure belive in reality...
you can think that character is sings when in reality character is is singing it won't change that it is fact...
The question is not whether the character sat down, it is why the character sat down. Someone may say they were tired. Someone else may say they did it because there was a chair and they prefer sitting to standing. Same action, different interpretation of motive.
Some people see what Sebastian did and see it as him being a hypocrite. Others will see his motivations and sympathize, seeing him not as a hypocrite, but a troubled man who's doing his best. They're not interpreting what he did, but why he did it.
The question is not whether the character sat down, it is why the character sat down. Someone may say they were tired. Someone else may say they did it because there was a chair and they prefer sitting to standing. Same action, different interpretation of motive.
Some people see what Sebastian did and see it as him being a hypocrite. Others will see his motivations and sympathize, seeing him not as a hypocrite, but a troubled man who's doing his best. They're not interpreting what he did, but why he did it.
It doesn't matter what are his motives if he condemns someone for something that he himself is doing he is hypocrite no matter what excuse you throw at him.He did that he is hypocrite as every person that will do such thing. As i said we have dialogue with him doing that to varric.
So no if we have reason why character sat down it is fact not interpretation.
And other people will still see him differently than you, because they too hear his motivations and see his actions and come to a different conclusion than he is a hypocrite. They are not wrong, as long as the can back up their thought with things that happen and/or are stated in the game, they have a perfectly valid opinion. Your opinion is that he is a hypocrite, but not everyone thinks that way.
And other people will still see him differently than you, because they too hear his motivations and see his actions and come to a different conclusion than he is a hypocrite. They are not wrong, as long as the can back up their thought with things that happen and/or are stated in the game, they have a perfectly valid opinion. Your opinion is that he is a hypocrite, but not everyone thinks that way.
As i said their interpretation doesn't matter if that face fact they can think that sebastian is jesus in da setting doesn't change that he is hypocrite and that they think he isn't even if he is doesn't matter. As i said we have dialogue between him where condemns revenge and anger when he is doing that himself... going to that point he want kill peoples that have nothing common with peoples who "wronged" him. But i said that many times and now it will be just spam.
So peoples can think that toaster serves communication with aliens but it doesn't matter as it isn't purpose of the toaster.
Some of my hopes for Sebastian in DAI:
He married rivalmanced Hawke
If romanced Hawke is missing, he's concerned, if not actively searching for her
Friendship/rivalry will at least affect how he rules Starkhaven, if he retakes it no matter what
Fenris is the royal quartermaster (or whomever is responsible for training recruits) in Starkhaven
Huh? Does the game imply this of you dont romance Fenris?
Anyways, I hate Seb. He is just some religious nutcase. I hate "God/Chantrys will led me to this and this and this and that" . Jiz use your own brain.
Huh? Does the game imply this of you dont romance Fenris?
Its just a couple of lines during the party banter.
Seb tells Fenris he's a skilled and would like if he could train recruits when he takes back Starkhaven. Don't remember how it ends; think Fenris ponders it.
Having not read any of this thread, including the OP, here is my thought on the title question;
I'd imagine that had Hawke been part of the ruling couple of Starkhaven, it would have been much easier for Cassandra to find her.
Well sure, Hawke could be the Princess of Starkhaven. That won't stop her from not appearing in Dragon Age: Inquisition. Being the King of Ferelden certainly didn't stop the Hero from not appearing in Dragon Age II.
How can Hawke be Princess if she disappears 3 years after the Chantry explosion? She disappears no matter which side you take
How can Hawke be Princess if she disappears 3 years after the Chantry explosion? She disappears no matter which side you take
This is assuming that those women that did the "chaste marriage" with Sebastian ran off with him back to Starkhaven. At least I think that's the idea at work here.
Retour en haut