Aller au contenu

Photo

Flex Your EPeen

Débuté par N7_5P3CTR3 , mai 17 2014 05:28

  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
102 réponses à ce sujet

#51
ObserverStatus
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 06:35

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages

CPU: Intel i5 2500K

GPU: Radeon HD 6850

Memory: 8 GB (1333 MHZ)

 

b4vk03.jpg

(why can't it hold all these disc drives?)


  • Kaiser Arian XVII aime ceci

#52
Rusty Sandusky
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 06:38

Rusty Sandusky
  • Banned
  • 2 006 messages
Is that a stock CPU cooler? Disgusting.
  • Zubie, A Crusty Knight Of Colour, NekkidNones et 1 autre aiment ceci

#53
Kaiser Arian XVII
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 07:31

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

So how good a graphic card can I buy with 200$? (any of Nvidia and AMD)

 

CPU: Intel i5 2500K

GPU: Radeon HD 6850

Memory: 8 GB (1333 MHZ)

 

 

(why can't it hold all these disc drives?)

 

Untidy people have untidy PCs! - An eastern proverb

 

That's just a sad PC!


  • ObserverStatus aime ceci

#54
Deathangel008
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 08:18

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

i5 2500K (non-OCed), ASUS GTX660ti 3GB, 8GB 1333 RAM, 1TB HDD. nothing special, but it runs everything i play in good quality. think i´ll get a new PC at the end of this year.


#55
Kaiser Arian XVII
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 08:37

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

i5 2500K (non-OCed), ASUS GTX660ti 3GB, 8GB 1333 RAM, 1TB HDD. nothing special, but it runs everything i play in good quality. think i´ll get a new PC at the end of this year.

 

I wouldn't throw that graphic card aside when I wanted to get another PC if I were you.


#56
A Crusty Knight Of Colour
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 08:44

A Crusty Knight Of Colour
  • Members
  • 7 456 messages

i5 2500K (non-OCed), ASUS GTX660ti 3GB, 8GB 1333 RAM, 1TB HDD. nothing special, but it runs everything i play in good quality. think i´ll get a new PC at the end of this year.


There are only 3 pragmatic upgrades you could make to that rig - an SSD, a cooler to overclock the CPU and a new graphics card if you really wanted highest settings for your games.

Buying a whole new PC would be a waste. It's not like the 2500k is treacle slow. A decent overclock and it's as good as current Intel processors games wise.

#57
Rusty Sandusky
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 11:46

Rusty Sandusky
  • Banned
  • 2 006 messages

Windows Windows 7 Professional Edition (64-bit) Service Pack 1 (Build 7601)/Gentoo/Ubuntu/Mint


You actually installed Gentoo. Stallman would be proud you /g/entleman.

#58
Guest_JujuSamedi_*
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 11:49

Guest_JujuSamedi_*
  • Guests

You actually installed Gentoo. Stallman would be proud you /g/entleman.


I appreciate my freedoms tbh

#59
Rusty Sandusky
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 11:51

Rusty Sandusky
  • Banned
  • 2 006 messages

I appreciate my freedoms tbh


I wish I could be that based.

#60
Guest_JujuSamedi_*
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 11:51

Guest_JujuSamedi_*
  • Guests

What


Haha yeah the TV is supposed to be a 1920 X 1080.

#61
Deathangel008
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 12:04

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

There are only 3 pragmatic upgrades you could make to that rig - an SSD, a cooler to overclock the CPU and a new graphics card if you really wanted highest settings for your games.

Buying a whole new PC would be a waste. It's not like the 2500k is treacle slow. A decent overclock and it's as good as current Intel processors games wise.

i know, i know. the problem is: i don´t have a Z MB (stupid in combination with a K CPU, i know), so overclocking is not an option and also not really necessary because i mostly hit the gpu-limit. (btw i already have a custom cooler, the boxed cooler was too loud for me.)
a SSD will definitely be in my next pc, but i don´t want to reinstall windows and all the other things so i didn´t upgraded it.
what also bugs me is the crappy memory interface of my graphics card (192bit), unfortunately i didn´t pay attention to it when i bought this card. (as an example: 6% more memory-clock result in 10% less gpu-usage in NFSHP which i run in 2400x1350 and with 4xAA)
the case is rather crappy too, and, more important, i simply don´t want to upgrade this rig again.
i know it´s a bit irrational, but hey, just let me be :lol:


#62
Schmonozov
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 04:40

Schmonozov
  • Members
  • 241 messages

GPU: EVGA GTX 780 TI superclocked x2

 

CPU: i7 4770k @4.7 ghz

 

1 TB SSD

 

RAM: 16 gb 2400 mhz

 

Monitor  : 24'' 1080p 144hz asus monitor.


#63
Naughty Bear
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 05:05

Naughty Bear
  • Members
  • 5 209 messages

My epeen = epeen*10^3


#64
Kaiser Arian XVII
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 05:16

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

So how good a graphic card can I buy with 200$? (any of Nvidia and AMD)

 

 

Quoted my previous post to be seen.

 

Obviously it doesn't deserve a thread cuz my budget is too low!


#65
Kaiser Arian XVII
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 05:20

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

 

CPU: i7 4770k @4.7 ghz

Fantastic!

 


1 TB SSD

U WUT MATE?!

 


RAM: 16 gb 2400 mhz

 

Seriously, did your PC cost you the price of a car?!


#66
Deathangel008
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 05:25

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

So how good a graphic card can I buy with 200$? (any of Nvidia and AMD)

i only know the prices in €, but i think the best card in this price range is the AMD R9 270X.


  • Kaiser Arian XVII aime ceci

#67
Kaiser Arian XVII
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 05:30

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

i only know the prices in €, but i think the best card in this price range is the AMD R9 270X.

 

The worth difference between € and $ is about 4 to 3. That means 4000$ ~= 3000 €.

For the exact rate you can take a look at financial websites.


#68
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 05:45

Guest_Aotearas_*
  • Guests

1 TB SSD

 

 

Which one?


#69
Dutchess
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 09:21

Dutchess
  • Members
  • 3 496 messages

Quoted my previous post to be seen.

 

Obviously it doesn't deserve a thread cuz my budget is too low!

 

http://www.tomshardw...ew-32899-3.html


  • Kaiser Arian XVII aime ceci

#70
Kaiser Arian XVII
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 10:14

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages

 

Sadly GTX 750 Ti is garbage and isn't much better than my GPU right now:

 

http://www.hwcompare...rce-gtx-750-ti/

Buying it will be a waste of 150-160$.

 

 

But with 190-200$ I can buy a GTX 660 2 GB which is quite good but not as perfect as GTX 680!

 

http://www.hwcompare...eforce-gtx-660/

 

and to compare with the boss: GTX 680

 

http://www.hwcompare...eforce-gtx-680/


#71
mybudgee
Posté 18 mai 2014 - 10:17

mybudgee
  • Members
  • 23 037 messages

My e-peen is caught in my E-zipper...


#72
Killdren88
Posté 19 mai 2014 - 12:34

Killdren88
  • Members
  • 4 638 messages

.....Alienware x51

 

UBFTL.gif


  • Kaiser Arian XVII aime ceci

#73
Deathangel008
Posté 19 mai 2014 - 10:19

Deathangel008
  • Members
  • 4 444 messages

Sadly GTX 750 Ti is garbage and isn't much better than my GPU right now:
 
http://www.hwcompare...rce-gtx-750-ti/
Buying it will be a waste of 150-160$.

lol, the gtx750ti is much better than your gts250, but it´s not a good gaming card.
 

But with 190-200$ I can buy a GTX 660 2 GB which is quite good but not as perfect as GTX 680!
 
http://www.hwcompare...eforce-gtx-660/

and the gtx660 is just ~20% faster than the the gtx750ti. if you don´t need shadow play or PhysX, you should try to get an AMD HD7870, just a few % faster than the gtx660, but the HD7XXX usually have a high overclocking potential. (in fact the HD7870 is exactly the same card as the R9 270X). i guess the gtx660ti costs "much" more than 200$ and isn´t an option.
 


#74
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 19 mai 2014 - 10:55

Guest_Aotearas_*
  • Guests

lol, the gtx750ti is much better than your gts250, but it´s not a good gaming card.
 

and the gtx660 is just ~20% faster than the the gtx750ti. if you don´t need shadow play or PhysX, you should try to get an AMD HD7870, just a few % faster than the gtx660, but the HD7XXX usually have a high overclocking potential. (in fact the HD7870 is exactly the same card as the R9 270X). i guess the gtx660ti costs "much" more than 200$ and isn´t an option.
 

 

 

Afaik the GTX 660Ti is just shy of 200 bucks over where I live (Germany, but that still means around 200 bucks for the US as you guys do not pay as much taxes in that price tag!) and is a brilliant GPU. Roughly on par with a HD 7950 and if overclocked easily on par with a GTX 670 in everything that doesn't eat VRAM like some monster. Also very overclocklable. My own Gigabyte Windforce x2 OC GTX 660Ti runs @ around 1Ghz core clock and together with my i5 3570K sees me to fluid 60+ fps @ 1080p and High-to-Ultra settings in Bf4 MP with very rare dips in the fifties in real tough situations for the GPU.

 

 

 

The problem however is actually finding a GTX 660Ti nowadays. For a bit more you can get a GTX 760, but those aren't much faster and in my opinion not fast enough to warrant the higher price just because they have a 7 and not a 6 up front (really, last reviews and benchmarks I had checked placed the 760 barely above the 660Ti).

 

 

 

 

And yeah, the 750 and 750Ti aren't good gaming cards, they are entry-level gaming GPUs. Good for most games, but underpowered if you want to run demanding stuff with good quality.

 

For gaming, I wouldn't settle below a GTX 660/Ti/760 or HD 7870/R9 270X. Interestingly, that's also all the power an average gamer needs, so it really is a sweet spot. Shell out those 200-230 bucks and you have a really good gaming GPU.


  • Dutchess et Kaiser Arian XVII aiment ceci

#75
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 19 mai 2014 - 11:14

Guest_simfamUP_*
  • Guests

SaAwFzn.jpg

 

Beat me to it ya bastard xD


  • A Crusty Knight Of Colour aime ceci
Retourner dans The Lobby (Off Topic)


  1. The BioWare Forum
  2. → BioWare
  3. → Archived
  4. → The Lobby (Off Topic)