I always felt this to be a problem with the writing of the game, but I ignored it for the most part because honestly there were worse things to be mad about (Kai Leng, The Ending, etc), but now I feel like it deserves mention. I find the pace at which The Reapers are wiping out the Galaxy in ME3 to be wildly inconsistent with what we've known about past cycles.
As Liara mentions, it took hundreds of years for The Reapers to completely wipe out The Protheans, and as Vigil mention the extermination of an entire species is a very slow process. The story of Mass Effect 3 seems to take place no more than a few months, and yet throughout the game there were lines of dialogue that made me raise an eyebrow. Like Garrus in the beginning telling me the Turians already lost 85% of their military, or when Vendetta mentions The Reapers are preparing to complete their harvest on the humans. I don't understand the state of mind the writers were in when they wrote dialogue like this. Even in past cycles the Reapers began with a distinct advantage because of the Citadel being their means of entering the Galaxy, but in Mass Effect 3 they had to enter the galaxy the slow way.
So how is it possible the Reapers are wiping out the galaxy in this cycle, a hundred times faster than previous cycles? I know people like to concentrate on the ending, and that's understandable, but the game as a whole just didn't have good writing. It had a few moments of brilliance here and there, but the whole thing came off as lazy and not well thought out.





Retour en haut







