Sorry if there's already a topic on this.
Well, I finally got around to playing ME3, and noticed EDI was still part of the ship. If AIs are dangerous (and, if my memory serves me correctly, illegal), then why would the Alliance keep her?
Why keep EDI?
Débuté par
Guest_Challenge Everything_*
, juin 01 2014 07:02
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 01 juin 2014 - 07:10
Sirzechs_Krios
-
- Members
- 158 messages
because Joker tricked them into thinking she was just a VI not a AI.
#3
Posté 01 juin 2014 - 07:16
Ribosome
-
- Members
- 1 925 messages
You need to stop hitting the spacebar so much during dialogue.
- KotorEffect3, Blad3Zer0 et SwobyJ aiment ceci
#4
Guest_Challenge Everything_*
Posté 01 juin 2014 - 07:51
Guest_Challenge Everything_*
Guest_Challenge Everything_*
-
- Guests
because Joker tricked them into thinking she was just a VI not a AI.
Ah, well that makes sense. Now that I think about it, I remember Traynor saying that Joker told her that. Thanks.
#5
Posté 01 juin 2014 - 10:34
KotorEffect3
-
- Members
- 9 416 messages
If you talk with Adams and you bring up EDI, Shepard notes that EDI had been posing as a VI to keep the likes of Adams from unplugging her.
#7
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 11:56
SwobyJ
-
- Members
- 7 375 messages
Yeah they pretty much handwave it by EDI pretending to be a VI and the Alliance being unaware of her truer nature.
And then Shepard is force-RPed into going 'she's fine, EDI is good/useful'. Silly Bioware making Shepard accept an AI existing. That's certainly not MY ME1 Shepard! (just kidding, my Shep loves Geth and negotiates with AI)
Would have been funny to see Anderson's reaction to it though.
