How -I- would do Mass Effect 4.
#1
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:14
- Skylar Astarot aime ceci
#2
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:21
Guest_Aotearas_*
Considering the magnitude of repercussions (yes, I know you guys were looking for the old, lame "reapercussion" pun, bleh) you can start with each decision in the ME3 ending, I find it next to impossible to build a ME game that succeeds the post-Shepard universe. There are simply too many too important variables to take into account to create a state of galaxy according to Shepard trilogy choices and just setting a canon state of galaxy would rob the players of their player agency from the previous games.
What they can do is either a microsetting game during any state of the galaxy (pre-Shepard, post-Shepard or during the Reaper War) that is too focused on a specific setting to have significant tangible ties with any Shepard trilogy choices, OR they can make a pre-Shepard, possible pre-humanity or even pre-Reaper-War-cycle macrosetting where the simple logical absence of any Shepard trilogy impacts makes the game a standalone title.
- DrBlingzle aime ceci
#3
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:24
There are simply too many too important variables to take into account to create a state of galaxy according to Shepard trilogy choices
Weren't most fans whining that Synthesis and Control were dumb, though?
What they can do is either a microsetting game during any state of the galaxy (pre-Shepard, post-Shepard or during the Reaper War) that is too focused on a specific setting to have significant tangible ties with any Shepard trilogy choices,
That would be a copout.
Pre-Shepard would be silly because we'd already know what happens- if set during a previous cycle, we'd either be under Prothean control and be sci-fi Qunari or we'd end up harvested.
pre-Reaper-War-cycle
We'd be under Leviathan control, then.
The only way I see Mass Effect going forward and staying true to the already established universe ( relays, humans, asari, etc. ) is a game set a LONG, LONG time in the future.
So far that what Shepard did in the trilogy would be irrelevant- but then again, they said you'd be able to import your saved games.
#4
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:26
So you have to hop to different universes (of Mass Effect canon, lets not get crossover crazy) to save existence itself!
That's how you escalate past already being in space!
#5
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:27
ME 4 should be about Multidimensional Reapers trying to purge the Multiverse.
So you have to hop to different universes (of Mass Effect canon, lets not get crossover crazy)
That's how you escalate past already being in space!
That would be rather easy though, no?
Our cycle built the Crucible within several weeks. Considering the Protheans were much more advanced, it is safe to assume other cycles were as well. You'd beat the Reapers back easily.
#6
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:34
They kill other universes Reapers along with everything else!
Yes I know this idea is dumb, but so is making a Mass Effect 4 anyway so might as well go all out.
#7
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:34
ME4 should be about a phonebox that allows you to go back in time for an excellent adventure.
- LPPrince aime ceci
#8
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:36
Multiversal Reapers!
They kill other universes Reapers along with everything else!
Yes I know this idea is dumb, but so is making a Mass Effect 4 anyway so might as well go all out.
Well sure, but the crucible would still kill them all.
#9
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:38
Before developing Multiuniversal travel.
I figured that would be blatantly obvious, apparently not.
#10
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:40
They have crucible immunity, they originate from a universe where Shepard failed, and the crucible was analyzed so they could protect themselves against it.
The reapers haven't been shown to evolve, though. They kept the same design for their troops ever since Harbinger- whom lived thousands of cycles before.
#11
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:41
#12
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:42
The only Mass Effect 4 I would buy, it's the one where Shepard fell to indoctrination, the crucible didn't work and what was left of the council species & co. had to flee to an other galaxy. If the crucible and the starchild are canon, then the whole franchise is dead to me.
#13
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:44
ME4 should be about Green Lantern - Mass Effect crossover!
#14
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:44
The problem with ME4 is that pretty much every choice makes it almost impossible to sequelize in video game form. One has no synthetics which is the basis of most of the plot, Control has an ultimate force against any threat in it and god knows what the **** Synthesis does.
#15
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:45
Well no ME4 for you then.The only Mass Effect 4 I would buy, it's the one where Shepard fell to indoctrination, the crucible didn't work and what was left of the council species & co. had to flee to an other galaxy. If the crucible and the starchild are canon, then the whole franchise is dead to me.
#16
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:45
The only Mass Effect 4 I would buy, it's the one where Shepard fell to indoctrination, the crucible didn't work and what was left of the council species & co. had to flee to an other galaxy. If the crucible and the starchild are canon, then the whole franchise is dead to me.
They lack the technology to do that, though.
Hell, they need relays to travel from one system to another.
#17
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:47
The problem with ME4 is that pretty much every choice makes it almost impossible to sequelize in video game form. One has no synthetics which is the basis of most of the plot, Control has an ultimate force against any threat in it and god knows what the **** Synthesis does.
Synthetics can be rebuilt. The Crucible simply destroyed all existing ones.
#18
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:49
Yeah but only complete dipshits would do that. Actually knowing the council that's likely to happen.
#19
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:51
Yeah but only complete dipshits would do that. Actually knowing the council that's likely to happen.
It's been proven that Synthetics can live with Organics just fine, in the Geth/Quarian peace ending.
#20
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:53
Yeah but only after hundreds of years worth of violence. I don't think the average person would want a repeat of that. Hell the peace was only possible due to the reapers code.
#21
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 07:54
Guest_Aotearas_*
It's been proven that Synthetics can live with Organics just fine, in the Geth/Quarian peace ending.
Less than a couple months interaction are not a viable sample size compared to 300 years of institutionalized antagonism and downright hatred.
Just saying ...
- Liamv2 aime ceci
#22
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 08:02
Personally I don't think a sequel would be a good idea. Each (ME3) ending would have wildly different effects and it would be almost impossible to make a game which could have a separate setting for each of those endings. And if one ending was chosen to be "canon", fans who chose the 2 endings which were not picked would probably be very disappointed.
#23
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 08:03
Yeah but only after hundreds of years worth of violence. I don't think the average person would want a repeat of that. Hell the peace was only possible due to the reapers code.
You underestimate the stupidity of human kind.
- WildOrchid et Liamv2 aiment ceci
#24
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 08:13
Less than a couple months interaction are not a viable sample size compared to 300 years of institutionalized antagonism and downright hatred.
Just saying ...
Which was proven to be the Quarian's fault, not the geth's.
#25
Guest_Aotearas_*
Posté 02 juin 2014 - 08:16
Guest_Aotearas_*
Which was proven to be the Quarian's fault, not the geth's.
That is relevant to my argument because?





Retour en haut







