505 réponses à ce sujet

[Eternal Dust]

DeathCultArm wrote...

Nothing to make me shell out more money and increase replayability than another pixelated body I can do akward ,half-assed, non-rewarding, stuid things too..Screw adding things to the GAMEPLAY lets add DLC that alienates people.....just great...

How does it alienate you if you DON'T HAVE TO BUY IT? Jesus Christ. Just because there might be a same-sex DLC doesn't mean that it will take away from more gameplay DLC either. Nobody said it had to be one or the other.

[Daerog]

I won't really care for the romance part, but a new squaddie with a possible good background story and sidemission. Sign me up.

[Grumpiergoat]

Anyone who'd get alienated by same-sex romance for DLC needs to get over their ignorance.



Anyway, yes there should be something there, though it'd be better if it weren't DLC and instead just part of the main game. It's about as "superfluous" as any of the other romances in the game. And it's a sad, sad day when someone doesn't want to see something in the game that is completely optional, anyway.

[rjeid]

DeathCultArm wrote...

This isn't the sims! If you want to live out some sick fantsasy do it on your own time. People bash EA for making poor DLC content decisions all the time, yet there's a topic promoting *** "romances" over items that enhance and lengthen gameplay|!!!!?!?!?!?

Adding more romances has the potential to create an even greater amount of replayability. Replayability lengthens time spent playing the game.

Also, "sick fantasy" isn't very polite. You're a homophobe, we get it, but nobody is asking to make the game force you into a romance you don't want.

[llinsane1ll]

Raltar wrote...

While I see no reason why there wasn't a same sex option for both genders, I don't see the market for something like this big enough that they would devote DLC resources to a small part of the community. I would support it, but I don't see it happening.

very true

[KainrycKarr]

ERJAK1 wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...

ERJAK1 wrote...

KainrycKarr wrote...

Uh, how are new weapons and armor useless?

Cuz, I don't know about you but sitting here right now I have 3 sets of armor and what I assume is the best assault rifle in the game. New armor and weapons are reskinned slightly powered up version of stuff you already threw out of the inventory. Oh, here's the best part, by the time they come out, you'll have already beaten the game a few times so...what's the point?

Replay value? A new look? Same reason some people wear different armor in me1.

Which is exactly why weapons/armor should be done AFTER the gay/lesbian, because the new romance options provide all that and MORE!

Hey, I'm not trying to be a target here. I'm all about you folks gettin your gay on, I just don't wanna lose out on new gear.


Both, would be much better.

[AngryFrozenWater]

To the OP: I am hetero, but you have my support. It puzzles me why it never made it.

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 23 janvier 2010 - 06:01 .

[DeathCultArm]

Fine. Once BW and EA listens to all this overwheling attention, and decides to spare actual decent game entending DLC in favor for a dating simulater, remember...you asked for it....

[ERJAK1]

Permutation wrote...

ERJAK1 wrote...

Permutation wrote...

DeathCultArm wrote...

Weapons, armor, and missions are more important.

Agreed.

Disagreed, spend ten seconds on the board and you could figure that out.

What does that have to do with anything? I've been a member of the Bio boards since '06. I would say take your ten seconds and shove it, but you'd probably like that. I'd rather spend my money on new equipment and missions over a romance option I'll never use.

Then don't spend the money on it idiot. Or do you have a compulsive disorder that make's you incapable of reading things before you buy it? 

Oh, and being a member of these boards since 06 and not knowing how important the romances are make you a braindead moron. Can you read? I bet your mother reads the posts for you so you can be bigoted and not have to learn anything, go back to J*** O** to the pictures of lynchings you have on your other tab.

[ChaoticBroth]

ERJAK1 wrote...

Nekator wrote...

ERJAK1 wrote...

Jake the snake 34 wrote...

Umm, i don't...

Then don't buy it and stay the F*** away from here.

ah
yes.. *applauds* very great argument from someone who votes for a niche
DLC, to tell everyone who doesn´t need it to stfu. Really.. that´s what
i call tolerance lol.

@topic - mainly because of persons like ERJAK i don´t want such DLC. Otherwise it wouldn´t bother me, even if i don´t need it.

I
wasn't arguing, he, like you, is needlessly  trolling a board for no
reason other then to anger people who desire this content. People like
you are the reason why I am so mad all the time, all you see is me
attacking a "brother" and you move in. You don't see how inappropriate
and unnecessary his comment was. So F*** you too!


How's that for an argument.[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/kissing.png[/smilie] 

So
the very moment he disagrees with your opinion, he's a troll? He's not
angering anyone, he's just stating his opinion. The OP asked who would want to see it, and he simply answered the question. I don't see you attacking a "brother," I see you being irrational here.

DaeJi wrote...

DeathCultArm wrote...

Nothing
to make me shell out more money and increase replayability than another
pixelated body I can do akward ,half-assed, non-rewarding, stuid things
too..Screw adding things to the GAMEPLAY lets add DLC that alienates
people.....just great...

Don't like, don't buy it. I didn't buy the second Mass Effect DLC because I wasn't interested. That's what choice means.

This fine man has wonderful advice. Listening to him would be a good idea.

[Kyero]

how about no, lets hurry up on Mass effect 3 so there can be a Mass effect movie or MMORPG.

[Eternal Dust]

DeathCultArm wrote...

Fine. Once BW and EA listens to all this overwheling attention, and decides to spare actual decent game entending DLC in favor for a dating simulater, remember...you asked for it....

Ok. Now go away.

[ERJAK1]

DeathCultArm wrote...

Fine. Once BW and EA listens to all this overwheling attention, and decides to spare actual decent game entending DLC in favor for a dating simulater, remember...you asked for it....

There are at least six romance options, it's already a dating simulator.

[rjeid]

DeathCultArm wrote...

Fine. Once BW and EA listens to all this overwheling attention, and decides to spare actual decent game entending DLC in favor for a dating simulater, remember...you asked for it....

I'll tell you what. You go find us a source where anyone from Bioware or EA said there was going to be only one bit of DLC for Mass Effect 2, and you'll have every right to tell us to shut up. If our request for more story/character development options is the one bit of DLC they do, and it costs you a re-colored gun or re-textured suit of armor, you'll be absolutely right to hold us accountable.

You keep acting like anything you don't want means you'll never get what you do want. Go out into the world. Compromise and rational thinking are almost essential and you seem like you could use a good dose of both.

[Traumacrazy]

ah yes, the "my opinion is better than your opinion" argument



gotta love the internet

[Kyero]

the next title will be



MASS EFFECT 3: Shephard comes out of the Closet

[Jake the snake 34]

It seems like some people play this game just to have romances.

[finc.loki]

DaeJi wrote...

DeathCultArm wrote...

It takes away time from something not as useless to be added. If it wasn't important enough to be in the game. There's enough romances in the game....Weapons, armor, and missions are more important.

New weapons and armor are useless in a single player game; a same sex romance DLC would actually add more to the experience. Plus, it could come with new weapons and armor.

Sure for the 10% that like gay romance.
If I was Bioware I would rather tap into the other 90% of the market.

Face it, there isn't a big enough market for this type of stuff.
Had it been, you'd already see gay romance in ME 2.

[KainrycKarr]

DeathCultArm wrote...

Fine. Once BW and EA listens to all this overwheling attention, and decides to spare actual decent game entending DLC in favor for a dating simulater, remember...you asked for it....

Because clearly adding a same sex romance = ME2 is not a shooter/RPG hybrid, it's not a shooter, no, not at all


IT'S REALLY A DATING SIM. THAT'S RIGHT YOU HEARD IT HERE FOLKS!



Moron.

[Erode_The_Soul]

@ERJAK1 - I understand your passion for the topic, but being needlessly hostile to those that disagree with you isn't helping to further your point or help get your message through to Bioware. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll



@ Original topic: Sure. Why not? I would be opposed to Love Interest ONLY DLC, but if these LIs were attached to some sort of storyline, then I would not be opposed at all.

[KainrycKarr]

Jake the snake 34 wrote...

It seems like some people play this game just to have romances.

That, or they enjoy the extra immersion of character interaction, which is taken to a whole new level when you can develop a relationship with said character.

Romances are the icing on the well-made cake of Mass Effect.

[Traumacrazy]

Jake the snake 34 wrote...

It seems like some people play this game just to have romances.

people like to get busy while playing i guess:huh:

[skitchin2112]

DeathCultArm wrote...

Fine. Once BW and EA listens to all this overwheling attention, and decides to spare actual decent game entending DLC in favor for a dating simulater, remember...you asked for it....

your half retarded arent you. adding a character that happens to be a new romance option for both maleshep and femshep. doesnt make the game a dating simulator people just want choices. if you add a character in DLC you have to have a quest to recruit them that quest will result in your holy weapons and armor

[Eternal Dust]

Jake the snake 34 wrote...

It seems like some people play this game just to have romances.

Isn't that why it's "emotionally engaging?"

My mistake. We must be shooting things up 95% of the time then.