"Mages cannot be treated like people. They are not like you and me. They are weapons. They have the power to light a city on fire in a fit of pique."
This is exact words. Yes mages are dangerous and can do untold damage but to call them nothing more then weapons, less the human is wrong. That is why I don't like him. He also said that templars own mages by divine right. That is not exactly what he said but that is what he meant Or at least how I understood it.
edit: cut and paste is annoying here.
I always play either as a mage, or a pro-mage character and yet I inherently agree with him to an extent. "With great power comes great responsibility" is a cliche, but it is so right in these corcumstances. A badly trained, unstable, or sociopathic mage can cause far more damage than an ordinary human. For that reason it is imperative that a system is in place to make sure mages are properly trained, and in situations where damage control can be put in place as fast as possible (templars dampening abilities)
Is the current system flawed? Absolutely. Is there too much control? Absolutely. Are mages being dehumanised as a result? Absolutely. But that requires a change in the system and a moral implementation which we as an inquisitor can hopefully achieve.
In a perfect world, the circle would be a place of refuge and study, where young mages could be sent to learn to control themselves and their abilities. Like a boarding school. With an even distribution of templars adult mages could then live normal lives ourside the circle if they chose.