Don't believe me, you need to watch more Dragon Age lets plays on youtube. But I warn you, they are disturbing. People skip all cutscenes and dialogue and play the game horrendously bad.
BioWare LP's in general aren't my favorite, ME especially, hugging the paragon options
How does that question make sense to you?
I responded because I thought it was worth pointing out that this wasn't what I was saying. Obviously.
But it had nothing to do with you. If you hadn't responded the question would have been dropped. You got nothing out of responding so why bother?
You can't prove that!
<<
>>
<<
Touche, my friend, Touche. I can't actually prove who or who wasn't behind any anonymous post. Even if the person in question is dead.........dundundudn. 
Guest_Avejajed_*
I was going through old stuff the other day because we're having a garage sale in August. I pulled out a folder from high school, one of those binders with stickers all over it. I think I must have been going through a Hot Topic phase because there were a lot of fairies and black and stickers with sayings like "Welcome to the dark side- we have cookies." It was so embarrassing, ya'll.
But there was one sticker that I think to this day really speaks to the situation we are all in. It was in a place of honor on my binder, next to the "Can't sleep clowns will eat me" sticker, was this one:
So really you guys- let's focus on the real problem.
Fortunately there's always "X is a jerk" videos.BioWare LP's in general aren't my favorite, ME especially, hugging the paragon options
Guest_Avejajed_*
a lot huh?
*Weeps uncontrollably*
TOO SOON.
I think it's great that BioWare is choosing to take this route and defining the NPC's sexualities a little more clearly (I assume).
I am sorry for the male Inquisitors who are disappointed in this news though. However, I have always said that unrequited love in narratives like this can be just as emotionally charging as the requited kind (as evidenced by the reactions here). It all just adds to the experience, so that might be a way to look at it.
But it had nothing to do with you. If you hadn't responded the question would have been dropped. You got nothing out of responding so why bother?
To point out that this wasn't what I was saying in case of any more confusion and misunderstandings. I considered clarifying my point but I didn't think it was worth it unless someone asked.
This is a very touchy subject obviously, I don't want to be missunderstood.
I generally don't play RPG's that don't allow me to create a female character. There have been a couple smaller RPG's in the past that I have been on the fence about and opted out of because while they did have romance options, they excluded s/s options.
That said, yes, you are correct in that there are always going to be extremes on both side.
My issue was when you told someone they were probably one of those people, just because she said something about s/s romance and called someone out on being a homophobe. Like I said before, I can't speak for anyone else, but most gay people that I know, don't hate straight people, nor will they say, "Oh, well you're straight, I don't like you so, you can't be in my group."
i pose this question to you then, how is what that individual is doing any different than what you do with games that have no female leads, or do not offer homosexual romance arcs? the individual was less eloquent, and more crude in the way that they said "gay? nope, not playing with that character" but it's the same idea, and same course of action that you admitted taking with other games.
that's what i'm posting on about, the ability for nobody to blink twice at what you're saying, but if it's the other way around it's: 'light up the torches'. that doesn't apply to this case in the truest sense, because the delivery of the denial by the other poster of not wanting to play with/as a gay character was more crude than your delivery of not wanting to play a man/straight character was, but it is still the same idea.
Same-sex romance threads have a predictable pattern.
Thankfully, the Sera thread on the character board is doing fine.
I would say romance threads in general devolve into whatever this is.
This almost makes up for absolutely no Cole info.
I forgot that dude was in the game. Probably because I have absolutely no interest in him.
Welp.
I could actually roll a chick first for once...!
Chicks don't like it when you roll them- well, I mean, some might- but make sure you okay it first!
I forgot that dude was in the game. Probably because I have absolutely no interest in him.
Also, he's programmed to be forgotten.
Welp.
I could actually roll a chick first for once...!
But I'm playing a straight woman this time...
Guest_Trojan.Vundo_*
No one said that. It was just a question. Does everything call for a over reaction here?
My bad, threads like this sometimes make me irritated.
That really has nothing to do with anything I said.
True, but when you were talking about 'how could they not be offended' it just made me roll my eyes. Not everyone is going to agree with someone else's opinions,beliefs,views, sexualities, and morals. Someone offends you? Oh well tough cookies move on, because life is like that. There was no need for some people here to call Diamond, a bad human being just because she disagrees with something.
But I'm playing a straight woman this time...
Then Sera being lesbian just removes some competition.
Yeah, not surprised if true. I had a feeling this would be the case, I gonna guess this points to Cassandra being a male only romance.
Wait, how so?
Then Sera being lesbian just removes some competition.
Except when I replay it and roll as a straight male.
Guest_Puddi III_*
Chicks don't like it when you roll them- well, I mean, some might- but make sure you okay it first!
At least give them time to recover first - breaking out of an egg takes a lot of energy.
i pose this question to you then, how is what that individual is doing any different than what you do with games that have no female leads, or do not offer homosexual romance arcs? the individual was less eloquent, and more crude in the way that they said "gay? nope, not playing with that character" but it's the same idea, and same course of action that you admitted taking with other games.
Saying "I won't play a game b/c it lacks homosexual romance arcs." is different from "I won't play a game because there are straight people in it."
i pose this question to you then, how is what that individual is doing any different than what you do with games that have no female leads, or do not offer homosexual romance arcs? the individual was less eloquent, and more crude in the way that they said "gay? nope, not playing with that character" but it's the same idea, and same course of action that you admitted taking with other games.
that's what i'm posting on about, the ability for nobody to blink twice at what you're saying, but if it's the other way around it's: 'light up the torches'. that doesn't apply to this case in the truest sense, because the delivery of the denial by the other poster of not wanting to play with/as a gay character was more crude than your delivery of not wanting to play a man/straight character was, but it is still the same idea.
Except that's not really the same thing.
I don't opt out of games entirely. I've played many games where I was a male character. I've even enjoyed them. I've played many games where I was a straight female character and loved them.
I have never played a game where I excluded party members because they were straight or male. THAT is the difference.
Most games have a male protagonist, or at the very least a straight female protagonist. I don't NOT play them just because of that. However, when it comes to an RPG and I have the choice to play not only a female but a lesbian, you bet I jump on that.
Anyway, we've gone WAY off topic and this isn't even what the thread is about. I'd be more than happy to debate this with you, but this really isn't the place.
Except when I replay it and roll as a straight male.
If the other girls aren't BI then Sera is still not competition.
Saying "I won't play a game b/c it lacks homosexual romance arcs." is different from "I won't play a game because there are straight people in it."
Why though? If the said not homosexual arc is extremely good and yet you are choosing to forgo it just because it isn't homosexual, why does another not get to not take a party member because the character is not heterosexual. That was how this whole argument started anyways.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
