Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age Inquisition System Requirements


1001 réponses à ce sujet

#526
Ava Grey

Ava Grey
  • Members
  • 511 messages

You were, though not for your fault.

 

 

The example I was giving was SRL having said that people couldn't run Bf4 because they had Windows Vista instead of Windows 7 or 8.

And pretty much everywhere else it has the habit of saying you can play it, but not good, because you don#t have the recommended OS, which is of course BS.

 

 

 

It's always best to have someone who knows a thing about PCs, or find the official forum and ask them than trust SRL to get it right.

Out of interest I just used SRL to test my setup with BF4 after reading this. It tells me that I can only run BF4 on medium because I have Win 7 and not 8. Seeing as my PC runs it on ultra and maintains a solid 57-60 fps, i'm gonna say I wouldn't recommend it lol


  • Saturamas aime ceci

#527
hazmatzak

hazmatzak
  • Members
  • 130 messages

I assembled my PC back in '07, with a quad-core Q6600 (like an i5 from four generations back), a couple gigs of (DDR2) RAM, and a fanless nVidia 8600 GTS (I prefer my computers quiet). Played all the Dragon Age and Mass Effect on it, and a few other things; not at the monitor-native 1920x1200, but something lower like 1280x800 or 1680x1050 with the graphics card scaling it up. A little fuzzy, but not that noticeable if you're not doing A/B comparisons. Over the years, put in an SSD with 64-bit Windows 8(.1) and brought the RAM up to 6GB.

 

Last year, bought Tomb Raider when it came out, knowing that I would want to upgrade the graphics. Never got around to it until the beginning of this month. (If I had waited until today, Steam is having a 75% off sale -- would have saved another ten bucks.) Turns out nVidia recently released their new Maxwell products, headlining with the mid-range GTX 750 Ti. The thing with Maxwell is performance per watt: the cards are small (normal sized, not extra-long) and don't require auxiliary power. With the "SuperClocked" (slightly faster) one from EVGA (with 2GB of video-RAM) I average 67 fps at 1920x1200 on High quality in the Tomb Raider benchmark (V-Sync off).

 

Midway TL;DR: if you have a desktop and don't have a high-end card from the past two or three years (in which case you're probably set already), a GTX 750 Ti is a no-brainer for about $150. Good performance that will fit (physically: size and lack of extra wiring) in most systems. You may not be able to play DAI at 1080p with all the dials turned up, but it should still look pretty good at a decent frame rate....

 

As long as you meet the other requirements of course. For Battlefield 4, which uses the same engine, required RAM is 4GB, 8GB recommended. Not sure how that will affect game play (maybe load times), but most people have at least the minimum. Same with OS: most people have 64-bit Windows 7 or 8; latter is recommended. (The required OS for BF4 is 32-bit Vista, which means you can't even use all 4GB of RAM; you need a 64-bit OS.) A little more complicated with CPU, but dual-core minimum, quad (Intel, hex AMD) recommended: again very common. For a lot of the people with desktops posting here, the graphics card is the main variable. For laptops, you will need a recent high-end discrete mobile GPU.

 

Data point: last year's Razer Blade laptop with the nVidia GTX 765M gets 44.7fps at 1080p on Tomb Raider High, about two-thirds what I got with the 750 Ti. On a sort-of-plus side, if your laptop's native resolution is lower than 1080p (or an integer multiple of it), you will want to game at a lower resolution to get better frame rates anyway. (They got 57.5fps at 900p.)

 

Final TL;DR: you may not have to upgrade your whole desktop rig to play the game. A simple graphics card update may be enough.

 



#528
L. Han

L. Han
  • Members
  • 1 878 messages

^

What? Go crazy and grab an ASUS GTX770!!!



#529
DisturbedJim83

DisturbedJim83
  • Members
  • 813 messages

^

What? Go crazy and grab an ASUS GTX770!!!

Lol that's not Crazy Crazy is 2 R9 295X2's lol 



#530
L. Han

L. Han
  • Members
  • 1 878 messages

^ Dat ain't crazy, dats nutz.



#531
hazmatzak

hazmatzak
  • Members
  • 130 messages

For "crazy" why not a 780 Ti? Why not 4-way SLI Titan Black?  :)

 

One other thing about the 750 Ti's low power is a low required power supply (PSU) wattage rating. Again, the 750 Ti is a baseline no-brainer "it should fit/work" replacement for the overwhelming majority. If you want more, go crazy -- or nuts. But that leads to even more questions.



#532
DisturbedJim83

DisturbedJim83
  • Members
  • 813 messages

^ Dat ain't crazy, dats nutz.

guess I must be bonkers then with Dual Powercolor PCS+OC R9 290's 1040Mhz GPU/5400Mhz Vram Each(stock clocks btw) lol 



#533
ahellbornlady

ahellbornlady
  • Members
  • 751 messages

Hard to say really as, I avoid laptops they are not really suited to gaming at least on anything modern, you might get medium settings with a playable 30FPS but I wouldn't set your expectations too high.

 

Meh. I'm not buying a whole new computer for a single game.

 

I'll be happy enough playing on medium setting if that's the best my laptop can handle. Only 30FPS though? I mean, I play Skyrim on Ultra with mods, and I get 50-60FPS on average. Is this really going to be so much heavier than that?



#534
Kinthalis ThornBlade

Kinthalis ThornBlade
  • Members
  • 563 messages

Meh. I'm not buying a whole new computer for a single game.

 

I'll be happy enough playing on medium setting if that's the best my laptop can handle. Only 30FPS though? I mean, I play Skyrim on Ultra with mods, and I get 50-60FPS on average. Is this really going to be so much heavier than that?

 

We don't know yet how well the engine will scale, but I wouldn't necessarily compare Skyrim to this.



#535
Indoctrination

Indoctrination
  • Members
  • 819 messages

Still no word on when it will be announced?



#536
Ihatebadgames

Ihatebadgames
  • Members
  • 1 436 messages

How will my cheap (I am poor) FX8320, 8GB Ram, windows 7 home premium, AMD R7-260x with 2 GB of video ram do?



#537
Deflagratio

Deflagratio
  • Members
  • 2 513 messages

Meh. I'm not buying a whole new computer for a single game.

 

I'll be happy enough playing on medium setting if that's the best my laptop can handle. Only 30FPS though? I mean, I play Skyrim on Ultra with mods, and I get 50-60FPS on average. Is this really going to be so much heavier than that?

 

It could be... Skyrim is a memory hog, but it doesn't really crack GPU or CPU the same way the complex and larger scale encounters of DA:I would. Running so much simultaneous AI probably takes up a big chunk of the second-to-second resources.

 

I'd argue that of all the games that would work at 30FPS, a Tactical RPG would be one of them. The Buttery smooth nature of 60FPS just looks a hell of a lot better, but I wouldn't say it's as important as say... 60FPS in Mass Effect or TES which have a (comparatively) large amount of precision and timing tasks involved that benefit much more from the faster input speed of 60FPS.



#538
DisturbedJim83

DisturbedJim83
  • Members
  • 813 messages

How will my cheap (I am poor) FX8320, 8GB Ram, windows 7 home premium, AMD R7-260x with 2 GB of video ram do?

Processor is fine ram should be ok if its at least DDR3 1600Mhz,GPU is not ideal but well you can always upgrade it later to a 290 most games a more GPU heavy so I'd guess maybe low/medium settings in 1080P hard to say as I dont go that low end on a GPU


  • Ihatebadgames aime ceci

#539
Ihatebadgames

Ihatebadgames
  • Members
  • 1 436 messages

Thanks for the reply.



#540
Kinthalis ThornBlade

Kinthalis ThornBlade
  • Members
  • 563 messages

Thanks for the reply.

 

Eh, you'll be just fine.

 

This PC only has a processor a bit faster than yours, same GPU as you:

 

 

It's running BF4 at ULTRA at 30 FPS at 1080p. That';s better than a PS4 which runs it at a mix of medium and high (not ultra) and 900p.

 

You should be able to max this baby out, specially thanks to Mantle (your lower end CPU won't bring your FPS down).

 

This game engine is actually pretty darn well optimized. BF4 issues are pretty much relegated ot server side problems, not engine performance. This engine does really well on modest PC hardware.


  • Ihatebadgames aime ceci

#541
wintermoons

wintermoons
  • Members
  • 185 messages
Just checked the game debate website and all of a sudden they have minimum requirements listed (I'm on mobile so excuse the formatting):

"Intel CPU: Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz
AMD CPU: Athlon II X2 4400e
NVIDIA GPU: GeForce GT 530
AMD GPU: Radeon HD 3650
RAM: 2 GB
OS: Win Xp 32
DirectX: DX 9
HDD Space: 16 GB"

Obviously the OS is wrong given what it says on the Origin/Bioware website, but I'm not sure if that means everything else is wrong? Not sure how game debate works as far as getting their info but I figured it was worth a post since the minimum specs are new to the game debate site.

#542
NewBlue

NewBlue
  • Members
  • 117 messages

Just checked the game debate website and all of a sudden they have minimum requirements listed (I'm on mobile so excuse the formatting):

*snippy snoop*

Obviously the OS is wrong given what it says on the Origin/Bioware website, but I'm not sure if that means everything else is wrong? Not sure how game debate works as far as getting their info but I figured it was worth a post since the minimum specs are new to the game debate site.

I'm a console gamer, but i've been worried for the overall quality of the graphics for the pc format as well.. so umm... do those specs alude to high quality? lol



#543
TKavatar

TKavatar
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

Just checked the game debate website and all of a sudden they have minimum requirements listed (I'm on mobile so excuse the formatting):
"Intel CPU: Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz
AMD CPU: Athlon II X2 4400e
NVIDIA GPU: GeForce GT 530
AMD GPU: Radeon HD 3650
RAM: 2 GB
OS: Win Xp 32
DirectX: DX 9
HDD Space: 16 GB"
Obviously the OS is wrong given what it says on the Origin/Bioware website, but I'm not sure if that means everything else is wrong? Not sure how game debate works as far as getting their info but I figured it was worth a post since the minimum specs are new to the game debate site.


DX9 is no longer supported by the Frostbite engine as well.

I'd say this is fake.

#544
Exaltation

Exaltation
  • Members
  • 1 383 messages
Got my new PC,not that high-end but good enough.

Windows 8.1 Enterprise 64bit
Radeon R7 250 1GB GDDR5 (OC)
8GB DDR3 1600MHz
i3-4150 3.5GHz 3MB
1TB SATA3 7200RPM 64MB
H81M-E34 SATA3 6Gbps USB3.0 (OC Genie)
FSP500-60HCN APFC
11GT Rev.2
Cost: 700 USD

Only 2GB extra video memory missing to pass the "recommended" test for BF4/NFSR on CYRI/SRL.

16beb04.jpg

#545
BloodyTalon

BloodyTalon
  • Members
  • 2 342 messages

Crazy would be buying a server type computer loaded with graphic cards and the like!



#546
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages

MY PC, with a Radeon R9 270x, is currently a bit of a mixed bag with Frostbite 3 games due to my aging processor (Phenom II x4 965 BE). In Battlefield 4, my framerate can get very low (around the thirties) on the very large maps, while it can get to 60 on regular sized maps on ultra. Plants versus Zombies: Garden Warfare is doing really well, with a solid 60 fps in all areas on ultra settings. Both of these games are running on the Mantle API in my case, because it takes away some heat from the processor.

 

I believe both of these games had pretty similar system requirements, so I expect the same from Dragon Age. Based on those games' requirements, here are my predictions for Dragon Age Inquisition:

Minimum:

 

CPU: Core 2 Duo E6850 / Phenom II X2 550
GPU: Geforce 8800 GT / AMD Radeon 3870
RAM: 4 GB

64-bit OS
 

Recommended:

CPU: Core i5-750 Quad 2.66GHz / AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
GPU: Geforce GT 660 / AMD Radeon 7870
RAM: 8 GB

Note that in combination with an AMD GPU with Mantle support, you can have a slightly weaker CPU than the ones listed.

 

This prediction combines the system requirements from BF4 and Plants vs Zombies: Garden Warfare, and removes some of the vagueness of the BF4 requirements. Note that both of these games have very low minimum requirements for current-gen games.



#547
Osena109

Osena109
  • Members
  • 2 557 messages

I3 4130  3.4

6 gb ram

gtx  745 4 gb ddr3

 

i can run  battlefiled  4   50 fps   i don't think  ill have any issues with dragon age Inqustion



#548
TheViper8234

TheViper8234
  • Members
  • 375 messages

hey guys I just got a new gaming PC ,I can run Inqusition now,right ? 

 

Intel i7 CPU @ 3.60Ghz (8 CPU's)

Win7 64-bit

8GB ram

GeForce GTX780 2,7 GB 



#549
Deadmac

Deadmac
  • Members
  • 773 messages

My New Slightly Modified System:

AMD FX - 6200 (Six-Core Processor) 3.8 Ghtz

Win 8.0

32 GB Ram

2.0 GB nVidia GeForce GTX 650

1.5 TB HDD - Seagate

 

My Older Custom Built System:

Intel C-I5 2500K Unlocked (Four-Core Processor) 3.4 Ghtz

Win 8.0

15 GB Ram (Upgradeable to 32 GB)

2.0 GB nVidia GeForce GTX 650

1.5 TB HDD - Seagate



#550
DisturbedJim83

DisturbedJim83
  • Members
  • 813 messages

hey guys I just got a new gaming PC ,I can run Inqusition now,right ? 

 

Intel i7 CPU @ 3.60Ghz (8 CPU's)

Win7 64-bit

8GB ram

GeForce GTX780 2,7 GB 

Yes you should be able to run on High or better in 1080P


  • TheViper8234 aime ceci