1001 réponses à ce sujet

[Warden_of_all]

You know there is a reason that PCs have to be more powerful than consoles to get the same quality of play don't you. A PC's operating system is designed for more general use where as a consoles operating system is designed specifically for playing games. The optimization of the operating system alone allows the console to do things with lower hardware that a PC would need higher hardware to achieve. For instance the memory on the PS4 is DDR5 for both system and GPU as well as being shared allowing for direct access for the CPU and GPU to the same info if needed without needing to copy the info to a slower memory type before CPU access. The Windows operating system, or Linux for that matter, can't do this seamlessly. The OS for the PS4 is designed to take advantage of it.

 

Don't get me wrong, I love my PC, but consoles do have their little nitch as well. I use both and love both.

[Fidite Nemini]

The i3 is a Amazing cpu and windows 8 sees it as a quadcore

 

 

It's not a quadcore, it's a dual core with hyperthreading. Big difference.

[Fredvdp]

From Twitter:

"Hi Fred, we are still finalizing the system spec. Please keep checking our social channels for updates."

 

https://twitter.com/...505537723957248

[BloodyTalon]

From Twitter:

"Hi Fred, we are still finalizing the system spec. Please keep checking our social channels for updates."

 

https://twitter.com/...505537723957248

So looking like maybe next month or next week,.

By the way like that avatar thats from my hnew favorite show.

[Kinthalis ThornBlade]

You know there is a reason that PCs have to be more powerful than consoles to get the same quality of play don't you. A PC's operating system is designed for more general use where as a consoles operating system is designed specifically for playing games. The optimization of the operating system alone allows the console to do things with lower hardware that a PC would need higher hardware to achieve. For instance the memory on the PS4 is DDR5 for both system and GPU as well as being shared allowing for direct access for the CPU and GPU to the same info if needed without needing to copy the info to a slower memory type before CPU access. The Windows operating system, or Linux for that matter, can't do this seamlessly. The OS for the PS4 is designed to take advantage of it.

 

Don't get me wrong, I love my PC, but consoles do have their little nitch as well. I use both and love both.

 

This is wrong. While there is overhead, most of it is CPU bound. But any PC that can be called a gaming PC will have a processor 2-4 times more powerful than any current gen console. And so you tend to see GPU performance parity across both platforms.

 

GDDR5, btw is great for bandwidth intensive work (GPU) but not as beneficial for typical CPU workloads (high latency). Streaming data from system RAM to GPU RAM via the PCIE bus is something modern PC's do just fine.

[Osena109]

It's not a quadcore, it's a dual core with hyperthreading. Big difference.

I never said it was a Quadcore but windows  8.1 sees it as a Quadcore

[Fidite Nemini]

I never said it was a Quadcore but windows  8.1 sees it as a Quadcore

 

That would be wrong either way, because Windows detects four threads, not four cores. The Intel Core i3 CPUs are dual cores with hyperthreading enabled. They can compute four simultanous threads, but they are still only dual cores and the virtual cores via hyperthreading do not equal a physical core. Rule of thumb is that hyperthreading is about equivalent to a 1/3 physical core in performance.

 

Windows simply can't detect a dual core CPU as a quadcore and even if some readout mistake says quadcore, the CPU is still just a dualcore with hyperthreading, so it changes nothing.

[Girtuoklis]

Does these system requirements are real?

 

 http://www.game-deba... 3: Inquisition

[nutcrackr]

Does these system requirements are real?

 

 http://www.game-deba... 3: Inquisition

Not real, guesses.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

I can't afford to buy a new graphic card until 2015. I hope this game doesn't want DirectX 11 requirements.

Considering that my GTS 250 can run Witcher 2 and Assassin's Creed 4 something around 15 frames/second on medium-high graphic settings (which is lame and disappointing), will it be able to run DA:I with acceptable frame rate (23-30 fps)?

[Zannana]

I can't afford to buy a new graphic card until 2015. I hope this game doesn't want DirectX 11 requirements.

Considering that my GTS 250 can run Witcher 2 and Assassin's Creed 4 something around 15 frames/second on medium-high graphic settings (which is lame and disappointing), will it be able to run DA:I with acceptable frame rate (23-30 fps)?

From past experience I know that Bioware tries to accomodate pc players that do not have the most up to date hardware but I would venture that the quality is not that great.

We will know more once they release the specs, hopefully within the next week or so.

[DisturbedJim83]

I can't afford to buy a new graphic card until 2015. I hope this game doesn't want DirectX 11 requirements.

Considering that my GTS 250 can run Witcher 2 and Assassin's Creed 4 something around 15 frames/second on medium-high graphic settings (which is lame and disappointing), will it be able to run DA:I with acceptable frame rate (23-30 fps)?

Unlikely tbh unless your running on the lowest settings its likely it will kill your GPU as ruuning Witcher 2 and AC4 on a card that old won't have done you any favors actually surprised you hadn't melted it already.

[Wulfram]

I can't afford to buy a new graphic card until 2015. I hope this game doesn't want DirectX 11 requirements.

Considering that my GTS 250 can run Witcher 2 and Assassin's Creed 4 something around 15 frames/second on medium-high graphic settings (which is lame and disappointing), will it be able to run DA:I with acceptable frame rate (23-30 fps)?

 

Well, my 5770 is apparently only a little better than your card, and it was OK on BF4.  So you might be OK, but we're going to have to wait until the specs are released to be sure.

[Joe-Poe]

Less than two months until release and still no specs? I need a new gaming rig and really need to know before I buy one!

[Gold Dragon]

Within the Next 2-3 weeks, Bioware will issue a statement: Either that the game has gone gold, or has been delayed.

 

Aside from the forums exploding, the Specs will be locked down.  For better or for worse.

Modifié par Gold Dragon, 24 septembre 2014 - 10:10 .

[Aligalipe]

I look at BF4 on Systemrequirementslab and it said only my video card isn't enough for recommended specs, and the only part that wasn't enough was the vram, it demanded 3 gb while I had 2, how much would that effect me assuming DA:I will have the same requirements?

 

Here's the system info:

 

Processor: AMD Phenom™ II X6 1100T

Speed: 3.3 GHz 

Number of Cores: 6

 

 

Video Card

AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series

Dedicated Memory 2.1 GB 

Total Memory 4.0 GB

 

Memory

8.2 GB

[Hannador]

Less than two months until release and still no specs? I need a new gaming rig and really need to know before I buy one!

^This

 

I know that I'll have to upgrade my 6 year old system for this title... and getting a new rig will put a sizable dent in my budget for the holiday season (which is already being planned out by my wife). I'd like to know what I need so I can get the fight with my wife over with 

[Revan Reborn]

^This

 

I know that I'll have to upgrade my 6 year old system for this title... and getting a new rig will put a sizable dent in my budget for the holiday season (which is already being planned out by my wife). I'd like to know what I need so I can get the fight with my wife over with 

To at least get decently to high settings?

You'll need at least a Nvidia GTX 600 series GPU.

You'll need at least 8 GB of RAM.

You'll need at least an Intel i5 processor.

 

If you want to run the game on ultra settings? You'll primarily just need to upgrade the graphics card. A GTX 700 series would likely be sufficient. Anything more current than that would just be excessive and a waste of money, unless you plan on full-proofing your rig for an extended period of time.

[Hannador]

To at least get decently to high settings?

You'll need at least a Nvidia GTX 600 series GPU.

You'll need at least 8 GB of RAM.

You'll need at least an Intel i5 processor.

 

If you want to run the game on ultra settings? You'll primarily just need to upgrade the graphics card. A GTX 700 series would likely be sufficient. Anything more current than that would just be excessive and a waste of money, unless you plan on full-proofing your rig for an extended period of time.

Oh, I have and idea of what I'm getting in my new rig. That's not in question:

 

ASRock Z87 PRO3 MB and Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Liquid Cooling Combo

G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB DDR3 1333 (PC3 10600) 

NVIDIA GTX760 2GB

+ other tidbits

 

The only question remains is how ticked off she'll be once I tell her that over $1300 will be missing from her Christmas plans.

[Revan Reborn]

I look at BF4 on Systemrequirementslab and it said only my video card isn't enough for recommended specs, and the only part that wasn't enough was the vram, it demanded 3 gb while I had 2, how much would that effect me assuming DA:I will have the same requirements?

 

Here's the system info:

 

Processor: AMD Phenom™ II X6 1100T

Speed: 3.3 GHz 

Number of Cores: 6

 

 

Video Card

AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series

Dedicated Memory 2.1 GB 

Total Memory 4.0 GB

 

Memory

8.2 GB

Your GPU is a bit dated. Three years if I remember accurately for AMD/ATI. You most definitely won't be able to run at the highest graphic settings as your GPU wouldn't be able to handle it. As far as more VRAM, that would be allocated in order to render more polygons simultaneously. Again though, your GPU is outdated regardless. I'd recommend buying a more recent GPU if you are looking to play on ultra settings. I have a GTX770 (last year's model) which is able to run BF4 on Ultra without any problems. I also only have 2 GB of VRAM, which is more than sufficient for gaming purposes. Going above that in most cases is overkill like getting more than 8 GB of RAM.

[Revan Reborn]

Oh, I have and idea of what I'm getting in my new rig. That's not in question:

 

ASRock Z87 PRO3 MB and Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Liquid Cooling Combo

G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB DDR3 1333 (PC3 10600) 

NVIDIA GTX760 2GB

+ other tidbits

 

The only question remains is how ticked off she'll be once I tell her that over $1300 will be missing from her Christmas plans.

Oh okay. That's way more than what you need lol.

 

The processor is overkill. The RAM is overkill. The graphics card is more reasonable, but certainly can run any current graphic-intensive game at ultra settings no problem. That's actually a pretty decent price though for that rig. You'll definitely be set for at least a couple of years, and then a GPU upgrade would probably be necessary. That largely depends on how much developers will try to push graphical fidelity based on new gen console limitations though.

[Hannador]

Oh okay. That's way more than what you need lol.

 

The processor is overkill. The RAM is overkill. The graphics card is more reasonable, but certainly can run any current graphic-intensive game at ultra settings no problem. That's actually a pretty decent price though for that rig. You'll definitely be set for at least a couple of years, and then a GPU upgrade would probably be necessary. That largely depends on how much developers will try to push graphical fidelity based on new gen console limitations though.

Overkill = a good thing

 

It's been 6 years since my last upgrade. My i7 920 has performed like a champ, but way past its prime.  This new setup will have to last me at least 5 years +. You're right about the VRAM, but I don't want to push my luck any further... for now.

[Revan Reborn]

I can't afford to buy a new graphic card until 2015. I hope this game doesn't want DirectX 11 requirements.

Considering that my GTS 250 can run Witcher 2 and Assassin's Creed 4 something around 15 frames/second on medium-high graphic settings (which is lame and disappointing), will it be able to run DA:I with acceptable frame rate (23-30 fps)?

DX11 is more or less a standard these days. Especially with a game that's being built on Frostbite 3, you better believe you will need relatively recent hardware to play at respectable settings.

 

I can already tell you your GPU is an antique that will suffer tremendously. The Witcher 2 came out three years ago and AC:BF wasn't exactly graphic-intensive compared to most games. If you are only getting 15 FPS on medium-high settings for those games, you'll need to crank that down for DAI. The settings will be comparable, if not identical to BF4. I don't know if you've played a Battlefield game before, but they also tend to be some of the most graphically-demanding games you can buy, on par with Crysis.

 

You may want to consider purchasing DAI on the Xbox 360 or PS3 for at least decent FPS, otherwise I fear your experience on PC will be less than ideal.

[Revan Reborn]

Overkill = a good thing

 

It's been 6 years since my last upgrade. My i7 920 has performed like a champ, but way past its prime.  This new setup will have to last me at least 5 years +. You're right about the VRAM, but I don't want to push my luck any further... for now.

You'll definitely be set for a while with that rig. GPUs always have a bit of a shorter lifespan, but I'm not expecting too much of an increase in graphical fidelity due to the limitations of consoles. At the very least you'll only have to worry about upgrading your GPU from 2-3 years from now, which depending on what tier you buy could range from $300-500. Anymore than that would just be throwing your money away in my opinion.