1001 réponses à ce sujet

[metalfenix]

I'm waiting for the Atari 2600 port.

[redneck nosferatu]

Well, here's my specs:

 

AMD FX-4300 Quad Core Processor, 3.80 GHz

8 GB RAM

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

Windows 8, 64 bit

 

I do plan on upgrading to a 750 ti and 16 GB RAM, but this is where I'm at now.

[SolNebula]

I'm waiting for the Atari 2600 port.

 

Hold your breath on it..that would definitely happen

[Dark_Rogue]

Here's mine:

 

Asus laptop

CPU: Intel Core i5-2430M 2.4GHz

GPU: Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
RAM: 6GB

Windows 8, 64-bit

 

I'm worried the CPU isn't good enough, but I ran the info through an online checker and it seemed to give the green light for minimum requirements at least.

 

I'm surprised there isn't an update for system requirements if they're already doing preorders, I don't want to put money down for the game and then find I can't run it decently.

[Setiweb]

That would be pretty cool  i picked one of those up form a yard sell for 50 cents

A C-64 cartridge plugin is included in the uber edition.  Instant on - instant gaming.

[mrpoultry]

Well, here's my specs:

 

AMD FX-4300 Quad Core Processor, 3.80 GHz

8 GB RAM

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650

Windows 8, 64 bit

 

I do plan on upgrading to a 750 ti and 16 GB RAM, but this is where I'm at now.

Save yourself some money and forget the 16 gigs. 8 gigs is fine and your rig would benefit most from the gfx upgrade.

[DashRashh]

I assume if you can run BF4 and/or NFSR than you shouldn't have problems running DAI.
https://systemrequirementslab.com

At the moment the only system requirements is Windows 7 or higher lol,it will be updated.
http://www.dragonage.../en_US/preorder

I run bf4 on high and I have gtx 560 ti and i5-4570

[EnergizerBunny211]

Purely out of curiosity, I read the Reqs for Call of Duty Ghosts and it recommends the 4 GB GTX 760 (which is what I have, the EVGA 760 FTW 4gb w/ ACX Cooler) and I love it. It's been the best card I've ever owned.  But in my experience sometimes Ive had cards that have been 'recommended' (among other specs that are far above even the recommended ones) and the games have not run all that well.

 

Does anyone remember Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Outcast?  I bought that game day-1 and I had specs that at the time were above what was recommended, and yet it ran like it was below the minimum requirements. Never did figure out why that was.  I had to wait for almost 2 years before I had a decent enough system where I could play it maxed out with no problems.  And to this day I still love that game, it's one of my all-time favourites.

 

Anyways...COD Ghosts recommends the 4gb 760, an i5 @ 3.6 Ghz and 8 Gigs of DDR3 RAM (all of which my system beats, hands down) but with newer and faster tech already out and more on the way between now and Release Day...I can't say that I'm not even a little bit nervous...because I bought my stuff in July of 2013 when it was all hot off the assembly lines then.

 

In my experience even the newest games rarely ever "Recommend" the newest hardware, they always recommend hardware that at least a year, sometimes two, older, in order to maximize the market appeal and playability for the largest amount of consumers.  Mass Effect 3 when it came out recommended a 2.4 Ghz Core 2 Duo with 4 G RAM and a Nvidia 9800 GT (all of which was at least 2 years old at the time)

 

I suspect that Inquisition  Recommended specs will be something along these lines:

 

CPU: Intel i7 3820

GPU:  3 GB GTX 660

RAM: 8 GB DDR 3

 

Tha's my prediction anyways

 

As of July 2013 to Present Day My specs include:

 

CPU:  Intel i7 4770 (standard version) with Corsair H60 Liq. Cooler (modified w/ dual rear fans )

GPU: 4GB EVGA GeForce GTX 760 Dual FTW w/ ACX Cooler

RAM:   16 GB GSKILL DDR 3 @ 1600Mhz

HDD: 1 TB Western Digital Caviar Black 64 MB L3 Cache @ 7200 RPM

Motherboard: ASUS Maximus VI HERO

Power Supply: Corsair 750 Watt 80+ GOLD

Case: CoolerMaster HAFX Full Tower

 

Keeping my fingers (and toes) crossed...because I just pre-orderd the Deluxe version and I really really want to be able to play on maxed-out settings and 1920x1080

[Warden_of_all]

Quad cores run battlefield 4 at just above minimum. If you want better you will want at least a six core cpu. I figure DA:I will be about the same. 8 gigs of ram is enough for recommended for battlefield 4 so shouldn't need any more than that. Graphics wise it looked like 660ti or better for recommended on bf4 so that should work for DA:I. I7 processors should work fine although Amd FX 8350 will work better since the I7 is still a quad core processor with 2 gpu cores for a total of 6 cores.  

[Ariella]

Figured I'd ask, and see what people say. Yes, it's a laptop, and yes, I use it for work and gaming, but need portability for work.

 

 Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130531-1504)

          BIOS: F.12

          Processor: AMD A10-5745M APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics   (4 CPUs), ~2.1GHz

             Memory: 6144MB RAM

Available OS Memory: 5336MB RAM

          Page File: 2155MB used, 4076MB available

        Windows Dir: C:\Windows

    DirectX Version: DirectX 11

 

It looks like I can run BF4, but I want to check and make sure I can run this at a decent level.

[deuce985]

 

Figured I'd ask, and see what people say. Yes, it's a laptop, and yes, I use it for work and gaming, but need portability for work.

 

 Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130531-1504)

          BIOS: F.12

          Processor: AMD A10-5745M APU with Radeon™ HD Graphics   (4 CPUs), ~2.1GHz

             Memory: 6144MB RAM

Available OS Memory: 5336MB RAM

          Page File: 2155MB used, 4076MB available

        Windows Dir: C:\Windows

    DirectX Version: DirectX 11

 

It looks like I can run BF4, but I want to check and make sure I can run this at a decent level.

 

 

I doubt with those specs you can run BF4 on low comfortable so it's probably a safe assumption to say it will not run DAI well. Just because you can run something doesn't mean it's optimal. You can run a game at 10fps if you wanted but I doubt anyone would actually play it.

[Ariella]

Deuce, I ran one of those compatibility programs, and it said I could run BF4, so...

 

Ran this: http://www.systemreq...ntslab.com/cyri

[metalfenix]

Sigh, just ran that page and compared it to battlefield 4 ... my videocard (460 GTX) is seriously lacking for the recommended specs...oh well, at lest I meet the minimun (can I run it on medium settings? that would be a challenge).

[Ariella]

Sigh, just ran that page and compared it to battlefield 4 ... my videocard (460 GTX) is seriously lacking for the recommended specs...oh well, at lest I meet the minimun (can I run it on medium settings? that would be a challenge).

 

The way I see it, if I can run on medium, it's still going to be better than what my Xbox can turn out at this point.

[Luke Pearce]

I upgraded for Inquisition to a:

 

GTX 760 2GB

16GB RAM

i5 4670k

Windows 7 64 bit

 

(I love my new computer) I have some trouble with BF4 using 4xmsaa and everything on ultra, if i turn down the msaa it runs perfect. I hate jaggies though.

 

Anyone know for sure?

 

Almost the same specs as my new computer! Except I have a GTX 770 2GB (instead of 760) and 8GB of RAM (instead of 16).

 

I haven't got BF4 to 'benchmark' my PC but going by what you've said it should be able to run it at almost max settings? I assume this would be the same for Dragon Age: Inquistion as it is the same engine and all.

 

I will get Watch Dogs and find out what my PC can do with that game (I hope it can max it )

[Caja]

*bump* Well, since you can order various editions of the game now, it would be awesome to know the system requirements for "Inquisition" . It's not that I am impatient, but there is no point of ordering the game if it won't run on my system. Or I have to start saving money for a new laptop. EIther way, it requires a bit of planning for which some more information about this topic would be great.

[metalfenix]

yeah, it's about time bioware! By the way, I'll be upgrading to a 750 ti by the weekend (and a SSD on June) . I hope that will be enough for this game

[PrayingMantis]

Well, systemrequirementslab tells me that my computer should be fine with running battlefield 4 on minimum. The only thing that is not letting me pass the recommended-section is my video card.

I have AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series, so my video RAM has only 2 GB and not 3 GB. This is making me really frustrated, because I like running my games with the recommended requirements. I like them pretty.

The rest is fine (pixel shader, vertex shader).

 

Should I buy a new video card before Inquisition comes out, or just buy the game, play on minimum and buy a new video card sometime in the future when they're not so expensive anymore? I mean DA:I costs already 70 bucks, that's not cheap.

Is this flaw going to restrict my gaming experience in terms of beautiful graphics a lot (I doubt it, but I'll ask anyways), or not?

[Osena109]

i3 4130  3.4

6gb ram

Gtx 745  4gb

1tb hard drive 7200 rpms

windows  8.1

 

my old pc craped out on me so i built my self cheap one till i can get more money  i hope it runs it

[Fiery Phoenix]

I'm going to go ahead and say anyone with a GTX 660 or higher has nothing to worry about.

 

Though, if you're concerned about maintaining that boss 60fps, then that's a different story.

[mrpoultry]

OP( and anyone else) I reccomend you not put any stock in System Requirements Lab, it is unreliable. For now use Battlefield 4's specs as a template. Bioware probably won't be releaseing the system requirements until around september time.

[hobbit of the shire]

I need to upgrade my computer but I'm not sure what I need to do to it.  I built mine a few years ago, but I'm not sure exactly WHAT I need to replace (e.g., everything including mobo or if all I need to upgrade is ram, video card, processor.... etc.).  Advice?  I'm not too knowledgeable of hardware.  I don't really do much with this computer except play games on it, and basically all I need it to really be capable of doing in the next few years is manage games like DAI and TW3.

 

OS: Windows 7 - 64 bit

Mobo: MSI-7586 (supports 1 video card)

CPU: i5 750 2.67 GHz

RAM: 4 GB

Video card: Radeon HD 5770, 512 MB

[EnergizerBunny211]

I don't trust System Requirements Lab, it's not exactly 'accurate'.  My hardware meets or far exceeds even what is 'recommended', and yet because I am running Windows 7 64-bit Pro....it says that I just barely meet the Minimum, because it 'recommends' Windows 8 (which is a garbage OS in my opinion.)  And if you actualyl go on the BF website and look at the hardware specs, my rig beats it all hands down.  I even researched the parts it recommends to get an idea of the timeline.  The 3GB 660 was released August 16th 2012-- that will be 2 years to date in three months time.  As far as technology is concerned that's a long time, the 660 is an "old" card.  Heck, even my 4gb 760 is 'old' by today's standard and its not even a full year old yet.

 

I remember when I bought the very first Mass Effect from Bestbuy; it had already been out on PC for about  year and a half and it was dirt-cheap.  I'd heard a lot about it, seen all ads and I wanted to branch out at the time.  I asked the service rep about the game and told him what I was running at the time (a 9650 Quadcore 2 Extreme @ 3.00 Ghz, 8 Gigs of 1066 DDR2 and a GTX 285OC from the now-defunct company BFG Technologies.) to which he very rudely told me "your system is crap (he didn't say 'crap') it won't run anything.  Even 5000 dollar systems have a hard time running this game because it's very graphic-intensive."

 

(And at the time it was build around a P4 chip)

 

So I bought it...got it home and it ran beautifully.  ALL settings were totally maxed-out and running (at the time) at 1680x1050.  I never had any problems with it whatsoever and I was running everything as high as it could go.  Clearly the guy I talked to didn't know anything about computers.

 

 

All I'm saying is this... if you have a computer that's built on even one generation previous to what is new and hot, and you have good quality components, then generally even the 'newest' games should run fine and moderately high settings.  When ME came out it recommended a Pentium4 chip @ 2.66 Ghz.  I was running a core2Quad Extreme which was at least 3 generations newer, and fairly top of the line stuff, but not the hottest stuff off the assembly line by any means, and it ran Mass Effect without a hitch.

 

So unless Bioware optimizes DAI for the latest, greatest and newest hardware on the market, or 'future-proofs' it by optimizing for stuff that is projected to be out six months ahead of time (like Haswell-Express or Broadwell and DDR 4) (which they won't), then I truly believe that the vast majority of us dedicated fans and forumites wlll be able to run the game smoothly on at least a Medium quality setting (which is respectable).

 

Everything will work out in time.

 

Enjoy your day

[EnergizerBunny211]

 

[Inserach]

My PC is an i5 3570k (3.9ghz) with 8gb DDR3 and a 2gb HD7870 and can play battlefield 4 on ultra 1920x1200 and get 30 to 60fps (average 45) so imagine could run DAI well enough to not need an upgrade.

 

I ran System Requirements Lab test for BF4 and it said I dont meet recommended system settings because I run Windows 7 64bit and it said I must have Window 8 (Never will buy this, garbage) also my GPU should be an HD7870 lol but said mine was a 7800 series card so don't trust this aswell