Aller au contenu

Photo

All this time, I hated Loghain's treachery.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
252 réponses à ce sujet

#26
knightlyEnigma

knightlyEnigma
  • Members
  • 5 messages
 

I've never had to either.

 
=>Back away slowly

 

Hatred can be felt by nearly everyone, but should not act upon it, embrace it, nurture it, and/ or plan to rule a nation because of it. Having an excuse is no reason; justifying it in one's mind does not equate to justice. Am all for patriotism, but cannot support murder, slavery, and Loghain's other crimes that are crafted thru his hatred of Orlais.

 
I respect your view, but would you expect a solider who fought in a war to free his country from these people to NOT be paranoid and hating of them? He has seen a lot from the Orlesians and I will go out on a limb to say they were not very good things. Also, when you defeat him at the landsmeet, he seems more than willing to step down and allow you control over his and the countries fate because he believes you strong enough to (and because you'll most likely be killing him. very soon. now.)

#27
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

  
=>Back away slowly

Hey, I don't kill her often.



#28
Zjarcal

Zjarcal
  • Members
  • 10 836 messages

Apparently dogs are so much better than people . No selling dogs to foreigners!
;)


Dogs are totally better than most people anyway.
  • CrimsonN7 et teh DRUMPf!! aiment ceci

#29
CrimsonN7

CrimsonN7
  • Members
  • 17 260 messages

Dogs are totally better than most people anyway.

Normally I don't agree with anything you say as you're insane but... I agree with you here.


  • Zjarcal aime ceci

#30
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages

I respect your view, but would you expect a solider who fought in a war to free his country from these people to NOT be paranoid and hating of them? He has seen a lot from the Orlesians and I will go out on a limb to say they were not very good things. Also, when you defeat him at the landsmeet, he seems more than willing to step down and allow you control over his and the countries fate because he believes you strong enough to (and because you'll most likely be killing him. very soon. now.)


I can understand why they hate, but cannot sympathize with it. It is this type of hatred that has led to problems suffered after WW2, Korea, Vietnam, etc., as well as social and economic confrontations. And it takes a severance from that POV to halt the cycle.

As for Loghain, would he have been as willing if the Warden had been from Orlais? His hatred blinded him to the idea that a Warden was needed to end the Blight, so he tried to kill all of them; his countrymen included.

A tragic villain for certain, but have no remorse over his death.

#31
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

As for Loghain, would he have been as willing if the Warden had been from Orlais? His hatred blinded him to the idea that a Warden was needed to end the Blight, so he tried to kill all of them; his countrymen included.

While I agree that Loghain is not the most logical of creatures, it's unfair to suggest that he would have concluded the Wardens were literally necessary were he otherwise. Bear in mind that the Wardens keep the secret of why they're necessary secure. The only evidence Loghain had that they were needed was that the last Four Blights had been ended by Wardens. That isn't proof, it's circumstantial evidence. And while we can argue back and forth about how strong it is, it simply isn't as strong as a claim like "You have to be a member of this order of warriors to manage to kill an Archdemon" should require before you should take it seriously. Now I'll grant you that he might have been more open to the idea of a large Orlesian army (with about 200 Wardens thrown in) being helpful if he were thinking more clearly, but why would he conclude they were necessary?



#32
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages
Actually, the time between Blights helps indicate the foolishness of his plan to eliminate the Wardens, as this circumstantial evidence should have been enough to warrant the possibility it was true, and without them, he was sending Ferelden to it's demise. Proof? Perhaps not, but 4 out of 4 seems like a fairly persuasive argument to at least consider for Plan B.

#33
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Actually, the time between Blights helps indicate the foolishness of his plan to eliminate the Wardens, as this circumstantial evidence should have been enough to warrant the possibility it was true, and without them, he was sending Ferelden to it's demise. Proof? Perhaps not, but 4 out of 4 seems like a fairly persuasive argument to at least consider for Plan B.

I'm confused as to why the time between Blights is evidence of the Wardens' argument. If you meant that the Wardens being allowed to exist between Blights is evidence that they're necessary, it's not. It's evidence that the Orlesians, the Marchers, and the Tevinters believe them to be so (or pretend they so believe.) As for the rest of it, keep in mind that the Wardens controlled the only flying creatures on the battlefield apart from the Archdemon (and no longer do) and that there's only four cases to work on. Also keep in mind that we don't know if Loghain knew about the Joining ritual (apart from the darkspawn hunt that the recruits went on, which is presumably the tale the Wardens spun about Daveth and Jory's deaths) before he took the potion. If he knew there was a potion made of darkspawn blood then yes, he should have at least considered the possibility of the Wardens being strictly necessary on the basis of the circumstantial evidence of the Blights and the interesting detail of the potion. If not, though, I'd again submit that there's simply not enough in front of Loghain that wouldn't happen in a version of Thedas where the Wardens weren't simply playing up (or inventing, since this is that kind of setting) an interesting coincidence.



#34
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages
Only four cases to work on? This ain't the weekend Wollup match results, but national catastrophes that threaten the world. And if all four had a Warden directly involved in the end result, it would seem prudent to keep one around in case the homicidal plans involving the King did not work.

And it has been some time since I have played, but someone had the ingredients removed from storage. Yet they appear suddenly if Loghain is allowed the Joining. This suggests that he or his minions knew something of the ritual.

He may have been a pet lover, as well as a General of renown, but his actions were short-sighted and hateful; not worthy of his own legend.
  • Tremere aime ceci

#35
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Only four cases to work on? This ain't the weekend Wollup match results, but national catastrophes that threaten the world. And if all four had a Warden directly involved in the end result, it would seem prudent to keep one around in case the homicidal plans involving the King did not work.

And it has been some time since I have played, but someone had the ingredients removed from storage. Yet they appear suddenly if Loghain is allowed the Joining. This suggests that he or his minions knew something of the ritual.

If Loghain knew precisely what those ingredients were being used for (knowing they're there doesn't mean he knows that they go into a potion that is then drunk and sticks around in the bloodstream), then I'll grant you it should have occurred to him the finished product (ie the Warden him/herself) might have something to do with slaying the Archdemon. At that point, even if he didn't believe the Wardens were strictly necessary (because to be honest, that's still not enough evidence to make that conclusion if you're being at all scrupulous about sticking to logic) he should have at least tried to keep one around to see if there was anything to the legend.

 

Though maybe that's why you're taken alive by Cauthrien? It might have been because Loghain wants to publicly execute you for the murder of Rendon Howe, except that any companion you bring except for Alistair gets to walk, and any one of them might have been the one to actually kill him.



#36
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages
Alchemical components in storage without a proper recipe would not be helpful to untrained Wardens, so it seems likely that one existed at some point. It is also know that it is likely a death sentence, so it is reasonable that it is not used beforehand.

And Cauthrien does not appear to try very hard to take the Warden alive, as the Warden must surrender. A guess: she is simply trying to remain loyal to Loghain; a man who is quickly falling in favor with many, and is trying to retain her image of him as best as she is able.

#37
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Alchemical components in storage without a proper recipe would not be helpful to untrained Wardens, so it seems likely that one existed at some point. It is also know that it is likely a death sentence, so it is reasonable that it is not used beforehand.

And Cauthrien does not appear to try very hard to take the Warden alive, as the Warden must surrender. A guess: she is simply trying to remain loyal to Loghain; a man who is quickly falling in favor with many, and is trying to retain her image of him as best as she is able.

It's also known that Loghain had a copy of the recipe, but well enough encrypted that Riordan didn't think Loghain had been able to get it cracked. How much confidence Riordan should have given the code is somewhat less clear, since we're unable to match Weisshaupt's coders with Howe and Loghain's breakers.

 

I never let myself lose that fight (save-scumming ftw) but apparently she does take you alive if you do. Companions still walk.



#38
congokong

congokong
  • Members
  • 1 988 messages

I'm sure even Hitler had a soft side.



#39
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages

It's also known that Loghain had a copy of the recipe, but well enough encrypted that Riordan didn't think Loghain had been able to get it cracked....


This is new to me; where was this verified?

And surrendering to Cauthrien leads to one of the more humorous quests in the game; highly recommended to do this once, but leave Sten out of the original raid at Howe's estate. One may also defeat Cauthrian twice; once at the Estate, but then lose to her subordinates to simulate a surrender, and then again right before the Landsmeet. This can net two of her greatswords; a nice set of trophies for that Warden.

#40
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

This is new to me; where was this verified?

If you hand Riordan the papers you find in Howe's room, this encrypted recipe is one of the things in them.



#41
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages
I recall the conversation now; misunderstood thinking that Loghain had his own encrypted copy, and not Riordan's. Thanks.

That still leaves Loghain with the components, the recipe, and the knowledge that they were needed for those wanting to become Warden's. Add in the fact the Joining kills many, and this should have given greater weight to the idea that Warden's were made for a reason; were not simply another merc guild.

But perhaps his greatest flaw was allowing Arl Howe to have so much influence.

#42
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

I recall the conversation now; misunderstood thinking that Loghain had his own encrypted copy, and not Riordan's. Thanks.

That still leaves Loghain with the components, the recipe, and the knowledge that they were needed for those wanting to become Warden's. Add in the fact the Joining kills many, and this should have given greater weight to the idea that Warden's were made for a reason; were not simply another merc guild.

But perhaps his greatest flaw was allowing Arl Howe to have so much influence.

Again: we don't know whether or not Loghain knew what the recipe said or what it was used for. If he did, he should have put two and two together and realized there was a chance the Wardens were literally necessary. (Though none of this is actual proof.) If not, then despite his very real flaws (and I'm not denying he had a number of them) his conclusion was the logical one.

 

And no arguments about that bastard Howe. Seriously. I don't know if Loghain could have lost the Landsmeet otherwise, since Howe's actions were the major catalyst for Anora finding the Warden and without him you wouldn't be able to make the "Torturing Innocents" argument. And without the queen you couldn't make the "Slavery" argument, even assuming that wasn't Howe's idea all along. (Though it's not the seal of Highever or Amaranthine on the papers.) Howe was also the one to tick off Vaughn, who might very well have gone with Loghain otherwise. The "Family Matter" noble was also someone who Howe's actions had turned to the Wardens' banner. You'd still be able to make the "Blood Mage" argument, since that was Loghain's decision rather than Howe's, except that you only find him because Howe's actions coincidentally drew the Warden to the dungeon Irminric was kept in: even if Anora defected without Howe's encouragement, the process of doing so wouldn't likely have involved Irminric.



#43
Elhanan

Elhanan
  • Members
  • 18 374 messages
Loghain knew about the components, recipe, likelihood of death, and their link to becoming a Warden, as he was at Ostegar when theywere used there, and he had them confiscated from the warehouse leaving the other Grey Warden relics behind. It is not logical to believe this strategist and tactician could not associate their importance, or of the need for Wardens.

It is only a guess, but perhaps there is something in the book lore that may further explain his hatred towards Orlais and possibly the Wardens, as I have only played the games and read these forums. But it is that hatred which undermined his judgment, and his legacy.

#44
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Loghain knew about the components, recipe, likelihood of death, and their link to becoming a Warden, as he was at Ostegar when theywere used there, and he had them confiscated from the warehouse leaving the other Grey Warden relics behind. It is not logical to believe this strategist and tactician could not associate their importance, or of the need for Wardens.

It is only a guess, but perhaps there is something in the book lore that may further explain his hatred towards Orlais and possibly the Wardens, as I have only played the games and read these forums. But it is that hatred which undermined his judgment, and his legacy.

Again: we don't know how much Loghain knew about the recipe (since it was in a code we don't know that he'd managed to break) or the Ostagar Joining (since while he could have been told by Duncan, he might have heard second-hand from Cailan, or he might have sent a spy to watch the proceedings we can't know that any of these happened.) How dumb he was to not take into account the possibility of the legends being true depends to a large extent on how much of the evidence that he could have found he actually found. (Now, if I'm wrong on any of these points, feel free to point it out. And if I am wrong Loghain looks just a bit dumber than he otherwise would for not having at least considered that the Wardens really were needed.)

 

And while I haven't read them either, Loghain apparently caught some of the Wardens involving themselves in a scheme with the Architect and some Orlesian Reclamationists (ie the party Loghain assumes any Orlesian belongs to) to Taint every single living thing in Thedas. The word "caught" is being used loosely, since Loghain only arrived towards the end and didn't see much of what happened. Duncan turned on the schemers well before Loghain arrived, thus managing to win Maric's friendship, approval, and future cooperation. Loghain was apparently kept in the dark about much of this, and I'm not sure Maric told him even enough to make clear that Duncan was trusted for a reason. (And given that Maric apparently had a history of trusting people he shouldn't, Loghain could very well view Maric's trust of Duncan as evidence against him. When you think about it, it's not much bigger a logical error than Loghain typically makes.)

 

To expand on this, I think I remember reading on TV Tropes that Loghain had a history throughout the books of assuming that whenever something odd happened, it was an Orlesian plot to take over Ferelden, and while he never had the details right he was never wrong that a plot existed and that the events he reacted to were related to it. If you think about it Ostagar (as he and Word Of Gaider portray it) was the same way. Loghain sees a beacon getting lit late, and assumes it was an Orlesian plot to kill Cailan. In fact there was an Orlesian plot involving Cailan, but one that depended on Cailan not dying and subsequently marrying the Empress of Orlais.



#45
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

I finally finished the City Elf origin after all this time. And I went into thinking I'd finally hate Loghain from this perspective.

 

But I pity him even more. I feel like the City Elf ---- for me anyways -- worked better by not living in rage, especially towards the end of the game when you go back home. That last side quest in the Alienage with Ser Otto kind of put a unique spin on the whole thing I hadn't noticed before. It was full of angry spirits and rage demons. I started seeing my own character like that up to that point. Full of anger and bitterness.

 

But at a certain point, you have to let go of that crap. To stop raging at the Vaughns of the world. How many Vaughns and Loghains do you kill until you finally "get better"? The more you hold on to crap, you just end up like Loghain. He's no elf, but he holds on to all the same type of things with Orlais. The Dog dialogue is just a glimpse into that. The best thing for both Loghain and the CE is to move on somehow.

 

Or... that could be just a bunch of B.S. You decide. B)

 

Also, I just keep hating Alistair more and more, each time I play the game. So much whining and anger, and he doesn't have even half the things to complain about as most characters. Not Loghain, not any Warden, none of the squad.. yet he constantly thinks of himself as burdened or victimized.


  • Ieldra, jtav, Riverdaleswhiteflash et 2 autres aiment ceci

#46
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

Nah, Alistair doesn't seem to think of himself as burdoned or victimized, at least by Duncan and the Wardens. He feels Duncan was the very first person who ever cared about what he wanted in life and saw him as a pseudo-father figure. 

 

But he is far more devastated by Duncan's death than he is by Cailan's. The words he'll use to kill Loghain if he's the one who duels him is "Forget Maric, this is for Duncan." He suffers survivors guilt and lays all the blame on Duncan's death on one man.

 

He also avoids responsibility if he can help it, unless he's hardened then he'll actually be happy taking the throne and starts taking a stand on more issues, even in dialogue with companions. 

 

I guess the best way I can express how I feel between Alistair and Loghain is pretty simple. I like Alistair, he's a good friend and my Amell warden eventually came to see him as a brother in all but blood, but I simply don't respect him. He ditches his responsibilities to lead the Wardens, as the senior of the two wardens, he defers to a raw recruit. He actively avoids bringing up the subject of being Cailan's half-brother, and thus the heir to the throne until we approach Redcliff, and even then it's only if he's in the party. If he isn't, he simply avoids bringing it up at all until after Eamon has recovered and our Warden is going "Huh? You think Alistair has a stronger claim to the throne than Anora, the widow of the late king has? Something you forgot to mention dude?" And unless he's hardened, he's essentially a puppet on the throne for Eamon. Eamon says it well, "He knows how to lead troops into battle, he knows how to turn to the Maker for guidance, and he knows who to turn to should that training fail him." Everyone knows that Eamon is the only person Alistair would go to for help unless our Warden becomes Chancellor. 

 

Loghain, I didn't start out liking him, but when I gave him a chance, listened to him, it altered my perspective and I grew to respect him. He has many faults, and I strongly disapprove of him selling elves into slavery to fund the war since the Civil War drained the treasury, and I also strongly disapprove of him hiring a blood mage, and an incompetent one at that, to poison Eamon, but Loghain has not really committed anything worse than what companions like Zevran or Leliana have done as an assassin or bard. Play Leliana's Song DLC, and she can be pretty dang nasty in that first segment, before she is betrayed by Marjoline. 

 

And before anyone says Loghain betrayed his king by abandoning him at Ostagar, Zevran helped slaughter an entire royal family, he tells you about it as the largest battle he participated in. 



#47
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

Nah, Alistair doesn't seem to think of himself as burdoned or victimized, at least by Duncan and the Wardens. He feels Duncan was the very first person who ever cared about what he wanted in life and saw him as a pseudo-father figure.

 

I just mostly mean he gets his feelings hurt easily, wants you to pity his upbringing as an orphan, when the fact of the matter is that everyone in that group has had a harder life than he has (except maybe Wynne). Relatively speaking, he had a great life. Duncan didn't save him from anything terrible. Not by Dragon Age standards at least.

 

That he also wants you to acknowledge some "father figure" relationship with Duncan is icing on the cake. Duncan was more ruthless than any of my Wardens (I would never kill Jory, for one...  lol). Alistair only knew Duncan for 6 months prior. This doesn't qualify as "father/son" relationship. He's so deluded about Duncan that he talks badly of Javeth being a "cutpurse", when Duncan was an even worse thief and murderer in his youth. This tells me that he knows little about him. He invented a fantasy about the man. I think if anyone knows Duncan, it's Riordan. And he has no qualms about Loghain. Riordan knew Duncan longer than anyone. They became Wardens at the same time. He has more right to talk about Duncan's friendship than Alistair ever did. I would listen if Riordan said something. At least his knowledge of Duncan wouldn't be a delusion.


  • TEWR aime ceci

#48
Tremere

Tremere
  • Members
  • 537 messages

It's easy to say that with the benefit of hindsight.

 

But without knowing whether or not each decision made by the Warden or Loghain would pay off, the rightness/wrongness of these decision is suddenly not so clear, given the Blight and military-necessary caused by it.

I'm inclined to agree with you... In principle at least. Considering the fact that there were alternatives on all sides... Different choices could have (should have?) been made. Having said that, I have a hard time seeing anything good in betraying your king, selling an already downtrodden people into slavery, laying the blame for your treachery on others, etc, etc...



#49
Tremere

Tremere
  • Members
  • 537 messages

Hey, I don't kill her often.

I don't ever "not" kill her.

"Churl indeed."  <_<



#50
Guest_Faerunner_*

Guest_Faerunner_*
  • Guests

I finally finished the City Elf origin after all this time. And I went into thinking I'd finally hate Loghain from this perspective.

 

But I pity him even more. I feel like the City Elf ---- for me anyways -- worked better by not living in rage, especially towards the end of the game when you go back home. That last side quest in the Alienage with Ser Otto kind of put a unique spin on the whole thing I hadn't noticed before. It was full of angry spirits and rage demons. I started seeing my own character like that up to that point. Full of anger and bitterness.

 

Funny, I've finished with a City Elf Origin too and it makes me feel even less pity for him than other playthroughs.

 

I don't like playing city elves who are full of rage and bitterness either. I know it's really popular to play a city elf who's all "RAH! RAH! I HATE ALL SHEMS!" but I also just don't see the point of it. As you said, you end up making yourself even more angry and bitter than you need to be.

 

I like playing city elves that deal with their upbringing by learning to laugh and shrug it off. To make little quips even at her own expense and find the humor, irony, and joy in bad situations. Some of my favorite lines from family members are "Still have your mother's smart mouth I see," from Cyrion (Dad), and "Still casual, as always" from Soris. Over the game my main elf also learned to like humans on a more personal level, see more from their point-of-view, sympathize with their plight even if it isn't hers, and by the end of Awakening some of her dearest loved ones and closest friends were humans (Morrigan, Alistair, Anders) and even nobles! (Teagan and Nathaniel.)

 

But at the same time, growing up in that kind of environment, receiving that kind of horrific treatment, and watching that many family members get hurt and killed your whole life (mother murdered by humans, aunt and uncle burned to death during a purge, experiencing multiple purges in a lifetime, wedding crashed and cousin raped, etc) will create emotional scars that aren't that easy to just get rid of. You can't just magically get over that upbringing in a few minutes, or even a few months. Even if you learn to laugh, shrug it off, and try to let it go, little triggers and reminders are going to spring up and stab you in the heart and the gut even when you think you've safely gotten past a lot of the pain and resentment of your childhood.

 

But at a certain point, you have to let go of that crap. To stop raging at the Vaughns of the world. How many Vaughns and Loghains do you kill until you finally "get better"? The more you hold on to crap, you just end up like Loghain. He's no elf, but he holds on to all the same type of things with Orlais. The Dog dialogue is just a glimpse into that. The best thing for both Loghain and the CE is to move on somehow.

 

Fair point, but what kills me about Loghain (from the CE POV) is not necessarily that he did it, but he is remorseless and hypocritical about it. He feels entitled to froth into a rage over Orlesians ("How fortunate Maric did not live to see his son ready to hand Ferelden over to those who enslaved us for a century." "Which of your stood against the Orlesian emperor when his troops flattened your fields and raped your wives!") but is blithe, dismissive, and annoyed if a city elf dares bring up what he did to them. If you spare him and confront him at camp, he even calls an elf egotistical for daring to hold a grudge for selling their people into slavery, despite the grudge he holds against Orlais! (Source, at 3:55.)

 

And I think it was deliberate on the writers' part. Loghain and Cauthrien honest to goodness don't see the parallel between Fereldens occupied by Orlais and elves enslaved by Tevinter. When a city elf approaches the Landsmeet, Cauthrien says "You've got damned nerve thwarting the man who fought to ensure you were born into freedom." To a city elf that just got back from "thwarting" said man by stopping him from selling their people into slavery.

 

Same with Loghain. Every single time you bring up Loghain's past crimes, he justifies his actions by essentially saying "Everything I have done has been to ensure Ferelden's freedom," even when you call him out on selling Ferelden citizens into slavery. One of Loghain's most iconic lines is: "Stand with me and we shall defeat even the Blight itself!" Yet, if you spare him and call him out on slave-trading later at camp, Loghain will say: "Which fate is worse: To live as a slave, or die without hope?" HUH? So if you're human it's better to die free at the hands of darkspawn rather than even risk Orlesian occupation, yet when it comes to elves, it's better to live in slavery than die by the darkspawn?

 

His complete hypocrisy and lack of remorse, his double standard regarding human freedom being invaluable but elven freedom having a price, pisses me off more than anything. My Warden personally identified and related to his feelings toward Orlais, and was willing to forgive him almost to the bitter end (even after she learned Howe purged her alienage after Loghain had appointed him and during his reign, she still said, "Stand with us, Loghain!"), but when she called him out on slave-trading at the Landsmeet and he pretty much said, "I needed the money and I'm not sorry I did it" ("Whatever my regret may be for the elves, I have done what was needed for the good of Ferelden," somehow failing to acknowledge that they are Ferelden citizens too) all pity flew out the window.

 

Or... that could be just a bunch of B.S. You decide. 

B)

 

... You make some good points, but I don't think it's applicable to all city elves.

 

I feel like you've made this false dichotomy that a city elf either has to be filled with rage and bitterness and hold grudges against "all the Vaughans of the world" and thus refuse to forgive Loghains, or they're willing to try to let go of their rage and bitterness and "move on somehow," and thus be willing to forgive Loghain. And I don't think it's that simple.

 

Besides, who's to say a city elf kills the likes of Loghain just out of a personal grudge or to "feel better"? Maybe some do it to serve as an example. Vaughan, Howe and Loghain hurt the alienage, and now Vaughan's, Howe's and Loghain's heads have been severed from their bodies. Serve as a warning to other nobles not to **** with the alienage.

 

Also, I just keep hating Alistair more and more, each time I play the game. So much whining and anger, and he doesn't have even half the things to complain about as most characters. Not Loghain, not any Warden, none of the squad.. yet he constantly thinks of himself as burdened or victimized.

 

And yet you feel pity for Loghain who constantly thinks of himself as burdened and victimized because of Orlais, yet has no problem burdening and victimizing others?

 

At least Alistair treats others the way he wants to be treated. I also don't see the "so much whining and anger" that you're talking about, as he tries to be humorous and easy-going, tries not to put his problems on others, and tries to joke about his problems instead of complaining about them. I've only seen him get mad when the Warden commits atrocities on others, or Loghain for abandoning the king and Grey Wardens to die, then pinned the blame on you and hunted you like animals for months. Whether or not you personally agree, at least those are reasons for getting upset.

 

Plus, he really does have a sucky life. Even from a City Elf POV, I feel sympathy for him because he's been used, neglected, and mistreated by all adult figures growing up (treated like an inconvenience at best, an unwanted burden to pass off to someone else at worst) and he's had no one in his corner his whole life. Those few he had, were killed. Even my city elf, who was treated like little more than an animal by most humans growing up, thought, "At least we elves have each other, you had no real family or loved ones growing up."

 

So, it all depends on your viewpoint.


  • Ryzaki aime ceci