There's always that possibility, certainly. I suppose what I mean is- I would want that sort of decision to happen regardless of Solas's relationship status with the Inquisitor. It should be made because it is something he wants, not because of romance.
Yeah, I don't want him to lose his immortality because that's what Lavellan wants or something. I want him to become mortal for himself or become mortal because the price of his plan is his immortality.
I think there's a difference between giving up immortality because Lavellan wants him to, and giving it up because of his relationship with her. I don't want Lavellan to force it on him, and I don't think that's something she would do. But if he decides that he wants to "grow old with her" then is that a worse reason than any other for him becoming mortal?
Come to think of it, if Lavellan and Solas gets to live forever, then Bioware might feel obligated to include them in some form in future DA games. I think they would like to avoid that because however they write Lavellan and Solas' story, it would be disconcerting for people who did not imagine them that way. For example, it was nice to see Hawke in DAI, but it was really weird because she wasn't acting like the way I role-played her.
They could just send them somewhere, like they've sent the Warden away. It'd be cool if they decided to cross the Amaranthine or something. Or maybe Solas just shows up without Lavellan - they don't have to be together 100%. I would think that regardless of the romance they have to figure out how/when Solas will show up in the future and how/when the Inquisitor will show up. The romance probably won't effect those decisions too much (in the way that romances have little effect on what Warden and Hawke do now).
This. It's such a sticky situation that I hope they just don't even talk about it. Immortality tropes are the worst. I mean, what if Lavellan doesn't want immortality? What if she wants to live and die in the world that she's helping to shape? And the whole "giving up my immortality to be with you" seems too melodramatic and overwrought for a Dragon Age game.
Plus, even if we get Solas-centric DLC, it's not like any of this is the end. Just look at Origins. Even if you got a "happily ever after" ending slide, your Warden and their love interest continue doing stuff in later games.
I feel like they need to at least hint at something. Open the issue and leave it ambiguous. Maybe it's just because we've had a debate about it, but is seems like a pretty big elephant in the room for their relationship. If they could pull off what they did with the frick frack snick snack - where it can be implied either way - that would be GREAT. If they avoid the issue entirely I will just be thinking, "what else is going on? How are they resolving this? Why aren't they talking about this totally obvious part of their relationship?"





Retour en haut




