MAKER NO.
I don't want to kill one of my companions again. I wasn't excited to kill Anders, but by the end of things I'd really just had it. With all of them, actually, apart from Varric, who I would have just walked off with had it been possible. There's a comic somewhere that utterly summed it up for me, but it was loaded with f-bombs so I'll refrain from sharing it.
Not a huge fan of the betrayal element in a romance. Conflicted "villain," yes, but it doesn't have to play out like, "Well, I think I might love you but I'm just going to do the really bad thing anyway and nothing you can do will change my mind about it, so BOOM."
To be fair, my perception of all the main antagonists (or those who could be seen as such) in DA2 was that none of them were actual villains, working for an actual nefarious goal (not like the Archdemon, or Howe, or even, arguably Loghain - maybe not so much a villain, in his case, but a mastermind who does some pretty awful things to further his goals). All - Anders, Meredith, Orsino, the Arishok - could be seen as victims of circumstance who took things too far.
I doubt they would create another Anders. i just find the idea of a protagonist who might have been involved with the other side as rather intriguing. We did sort of have this with Morrigan and Zevran, but they were bit players in the grander scheme of things. Like I find the idea of an antagonist who could persuade me to their side intriguing. Like the Architect, for example. I kill him as often as not, but it's a difficult decision when I do, and I can't help but feel regret if I decide I have to.





Retour en haut





