I've been on the receiving end of this inability to disagree civilly so I'm not sure what point you're making. I will cop to having a blunt way of phrasing things but I wasn't even impolite about my request. Most topics are fine but there are some things that can't be said in this thread.
Varied opinions are good. Which is why people who have a problem with any of the off limits topics being silenced by mocking and trolling is bad.
*shrugs* That's you. Not everyone is as okay with being pounced on as you are and they shouldn't necessarily have to be.
Edit: I just wanted to suggest that some people may not feel like this is an environment where civil disagreement is necessarily going to happen. Dropping the topic now.
I've only been here for a short while, but I've had really wonderful discussions with people about everything from Orlais to Michel de Chevin to the morality of Blackwall to Anders and, while the disagreement has been vehement at times, it's never been unpleasant. I don't mean to drag this conversation out, but I think there's a huge difference between disagreeing insofar as "I disagree with you on topic A" and what I've seen people being called out on which is more along the lines of "You shouldn't be talking about topic A/talking about topic A like this," which is less an expression of a differing opinion and more of a condemnation of people for having an opinion/discussion about a certain topic to begin with.
I'm hoping that the Kingdoms will gain independence, I want Sansa ruling the Vale...
Hmm~ yes
My personal headcanon is that Dany ends up destroying the Iron Throne and ending the Targaryen legacy in the 7K before returning to Essos and becoming THE STALLION THAT MOUNTS THE WORLD AW YISS
More seriously, I do believe that the prophecy of the crones of Vaes Dothrak is about Dany and not her child - that her true destiny is not to reclaim the 7K but to unite the Dothraki hordes in Essos, ending the trade of slavery for good, and bringing all of them to the Mountain as one horde.