Would you find it harder to love him if he "lied" more obviously, like by denying to be an ancient elf? His situation and reasons would be the same after all. Would it make so much of a difference if only he spoke out the lie instead of just hiding the truth?
For example, I never had an actual issue with Blackwall's explicit lies. Because it makes sense that he lied. He wanted to help, he wanted to fight the greater evil, but he knew the Inquisition would not take him in if he told the truth. Hence he lied to me. I find that a natural reaction and I understand his reasons, so I accept this. I have a problem with what he did (ordering killings for money), but the lying itself is not my big issue.
Same with Solas. I question his plan in the first place, giving away the orb and stuff. And I am angry at him for keeping knowledge away that could have saved lives (e.g., leading us to Skyhold before an assault on Haven). But him "lying" about who he was? I understand that, I have no problem with that.
I think it would've changed some of the tone and the feeling afterward if he were just a direct liar instead of a mix of what appears to be a lot of genuine, yet carefully communicated and obscured personality, with some degree of lies. In the case of Blackwall, I understand that too, though I pretty much had him figured out. I think sending him to the Wardens was satisfying and it fulfilled his desire and the original Blackwall's wish for him anyway. If he actually survives a Joining....we'll see.
In any case, what I'm talking about is more nuances and slight tone shifts. If Solas were just outright lying instead of being careful to obscure things (which ultimately results in the truth being hidden in any case), it would feel more like a betrayal.





Retour en haut








