Not at all. As I said, feedback is important, and I don't feel my own opinions are wrong. Why would I have them, otherwise? I don't expect others to adhere to them, though, when it comes to what they create for others to enjoy. I don't whimper, as a rule, but while I can unfortunately understand the mentality that believes shouting into the night while others walk away is merely avoiding the appearance of cowardice, the reality is that you appear more like a small terrier, yapping at the wind, because it is the biggest dog around.
My point, which does not seem to be important, so I gather this should be my last reply (though everyone has been kind enough to not crucify me for doing so the first time), is that these are not our toys. Even putting aside that they are games, books, toys, stories, whatever, accounting for the fact that one can care for them very much, that doesn't mean they won't diverge from us. It's not brave to call your ex and give them an 8 page list of where they went wrong in their relationship and why they were foolish to take a path that diverged from yours. It's sad. Letting them go their own way doesn't mean you have to alter your course by a single step - it just means accepting that people, books, games, and our own ability to appreciate them, will fluctuate with time.
I can see the parts of Rand that must appeal to you, but regardless of what I think of that, I think you are missing the part where you go out and create yourself, rather than relying on others to do it for you.
I envy the certainty you seem to have in all things great and small. It must be very comforting. Perhaps a return to topic?
I think it's you who missed my point, if you think the cowardice in question referred to not speaking up when something upsets you. It does not. It refers to whining about the idea of 'right' while you depend on on people who use it. Because every element you've enjoyed of every story is probably there because someone decided it was 'right.' You hide behind the same people you need - because you need them, not only letting them take the hits for you, but denouncing them for doing so. That doesn't sound cowardly to you?
I don't expect BioWare to adhere to my suggestions, I as literally said in my previous post. I do not expect their next game to well written. I think that would be somewhat foolish at this point. And I don't really expect any other developers to be adhere to them either, else I would be spending my time on their forums. But you are correct in that perhaps I am overestimating the sort of impact reasoning can have on people. I would consider it overwhelmingly, inescapably obvious that cuddles are not an acceptable substitute for narrative fundamentals, but you're right. It's weakness on my part to assume that's something within the grasp of everyone.
I'm not relying on anyone. I do certainly think it would be nice for a masterpiece to exist in the world instead of a flop. I do like beautiful things.
I envy the certainty you seem to have in all things great and small. It must be very comforting. Perhaps a return to topic?
Hardly. Just the things I choose to speak about in such a manner. Don't mix up cause and effect and make claims to denounce the concept of 'right at all times and places' and end up denouncing the concept of 'right, anywhere.'