A lot of these narratives are also done from the perspective of the people who are trying to reset that future, not the people who inhabit that future in the first place. Maybe Solas is right, and modern Thedas really does suck in comparison to Arlathan. But modern Thedas has its own culture and inhabitants, who probably wouldn't appreciate having their world reset to suit someone else's fancy. It's an interesting dilemma to be sure, and no one is in the right as far as we know.
Yeah... that was actually, kinda my point.
I mean, think about it. No one objects to the rewinding and rewriting history narrative when the audience's perspective is from the "past is better" side (EDIT: Well, except the villain, nacht), but when the audience's perspective is from the "this is the only historical timeline we've ever known" side, suddenly rewinding and rewriting is bad?
Coming back to Solas, IF his intention is close to what we think ("collapse and recreate reality," effectively erasing or at least changing human history to bring back the elves' lost glory), I think it's funny how they're flipping the usual "Hero tries to right past wrongs" narratives, because now it's a secondary character trying to change the historical timeline while the POV protagonist is a regular member of that timeline. HOWEVER, while "change history to right past wrongs" narratives are always treated as just fine when the POV protagonist does it, now that a secondary character is doing it... it could go a number of ways.
And I just find it interesting. It has suspicious shades of Protagonist-Centered Morality and Moral Myopia.
Now that we're on this topic, I think it would be interesting if some movie-maker or video game creator set up the usual "the future is so terrible that the hero must go back to right past wrongs" narratives, only instead of secondary, non-villainous characters unambiguously supporting them, they would oppose them. Not in the "hateful strawman you want to tear down" way, but sympathetic characters who make compelling arguments that, from their perspective, our "Hellish future" is their regular present, and they don't want us to go back and erase their lives, histories, presents and/or futures. And then our audience POV protagonist has to confront that while we still see this timeline as "terrible," we can't just erase it because these people are real and they see enough good in this timeline to stick with it even if we can hit a giant RESET button. (As most players would likely expect Solas to do when the time comes, if something like this is indeed his goal.)
Or, conversely, (and keeping this on-topic with Solas) it would be interesting if BioWare went the route that Solas wants to correct past wrongs, and the POV protagonist is eventually supposed to "see the light" and support him in his endeavor. After all, secondary characters in other "the future sucks, let's rewrite the past" narratives are expected to get on board. It certainly happened when the Inquisitor tried to stop the Elder One's future in DAI. Does that change just because it's our collective audience POV present that's at stake?
I don't think they will, but I think it would be interesting.
P.S. I'm sorry if it seems like I'm often picking on or singling out your posts, I dont' meant to. I just find a lot of your posts very thought-provoking, and I like exploring the insight they invoke. 