I personally think it's a great pose, just the right amount of subtlety, and just beautiful overall.
I assume that might be it... When I see those "computer graphic style" pictures with clear lines and colors, they are pretty and all. But it's hardly more than that. I did a picture with bézier curves recently. Used a Latex program, defined the coordinates and angles, and gradually adjusted the values until it looked like I wanted. It's tedious work, but it's "simple" to get a nice looking result after enough iterations. Free drawing however amazes me. And in those sketches I can see the abilities of the artist. Helper lines and maybe tiny fixes or double lines for adjustment, that's the things that emphasize how good the picture itself is and how well the artist is able to capture a movement or proportion. The less polished, the more an image affects me. And it takes longer to get the picture. Eye and brain have to process and organize more, that motivates me.
Blahblahblah Siha. In short: it is beautiful. There are so many talented people here, it's incredible.
I try to get my boyfriend off his butt to go to art museums and the like and he thinks viewing pictures online of paintings and sculpture is just as good. But no. I love the way you described that, since one of my favorite things is to probably make the museum guards worried since I walk up as close as I can get and look for the traces of brushstrokes, lines peeking out from underneath a layer, patterns, details up close, etc. And it's the same with sketches, as you said. Or when I visit exhibitions or museums where writers' books/notes/manuscripts are stored.
Now that people create so much on machines, we lose a bit of these touches. They tell so much. Not that I'm slamming digital art or writing, because I am not. It's just a new stage of where we are.
I think I will have to write the fluff piece I've had in my mind that includes mention of Solas finishing a section of his fresco while Lavellan is away.





Retour en haut
















