Crit-path first doesn't mean everything always ends terribly. Appeasing his fans by changing his character and changing his goals and changing his outcome just to make a happy ending exist would be bad writing and bad for his character, yes. But we have no idea what crit-path is. It could have always not ended in despair. The consistent, always-there-since-Origins plan could have always not been depressing. I don't understand why Solas dying is the clear, accepted outcome and anything else is a naive deviation that can only be explained as pandering away from the obvious "true course." We (fans) are all just making this stuff up as we go.
As far as romance specific "choices," I think it all comes down to (highly meaningful) flavor text. You can kill Anders or you can send him on his depressing way. The option isn't only there if you romance him--it just means you can run away with him. If Solas has a way not to avoid being killed (going with the assumption that that's even an issue), it wouldn't be there just for people that romanced him--it would probably just mean more for someone who romanced him and would hopefully involve them in some way. I don't think we've ever actually gotten a new choice just for romancing someone--it's just that the same choices are more nuanced and deeper so they feel like a special choice of their own.
(Also, I don't think anyone would describe Anders as having a "happy story," but I consider him running off with Hawke to be happy enough with everything that happened. So...still not feeling threatened by the tweet.)





Retour en haut









