Point taken. But not everyone who has an illness like that or any other is comfortable discussing it and there may be people here for whom the topic is uncomfortable.I don't want to stir the pot, and nor is this reply aimed at you in particular (not at all!), but...
In general, I take issue with being told too much when and where to have discussions about sensitive, and very political subjects, like mental illness. Sometimes it is a very quiet way of telling people to stop talking about it. Particularly, I think it's troubling when those who have struggled with mental illness are being told to change the subject, because those people often have the best, most accurate insight on the problem.
I think if someone has said or done something ableist - something which someone has a (quite rightly) principled opposition to - then I think it's wrong to change the subject just to ensure the perpetrator doesn't feel too uncomfortable. Offence isn't always subjective - sometimes, you just get it wrong, and I would prefer people to accept that they might be wrong, even if it is uncomfortable. If we can't point out when people are talking and thinking about mental illness in an insensitive or offensive manner, when will people's attitudes towards mental illness ever get better?
/hops off soapbox.
Nobody needs to reply to this - not everything I've said applies to what's happened. I'd just prefer for people to think about it, actually.
My point is that snapping at people and calling them insensitive and morally wrong doesn't teach or educate. There are better ways.
As far as people saying to take it to pm, well, people try to control the conversation and topic here frequently. This isn't new and it's not limited to this particular conversation and debate.





Retour en haut





