A tumblr post urging people to stop using the word "genocide" while talking about Solas' plans.
A post that I tend to agree with.
"This is an offhand rant, a stream-of-consciousness blurb.
I’ve been on reddit and Tumblr a lot for the past few days post-Trespasser. Dealing with my post-Trespasser feelings have been amazing. The communities on both websites are great.
But obviously, reddit contains some more anti-Solas players, which I’m fine with. You’re supposed to feel that way about Solas. We’re supposed to be split. Some of us love him, some of us hate him. The writers threw in all kind of ambiguity in the game on purpose. They threw in choices so that the community WOULD be split, because whatever they have planned for Solas in DA4, whether we recruit him or chase him or kill him or redeem him, it’ll be worth it. I trust Bioware with their plot twists and surprises and the way they lead us through the plot in ways we expected but we’re given something completely different, something awesome.
But to all those who hate Solas and definitively say he is evil, he is the villain, etc. etc., I implore you: stop using the term “genocide”.
You are allowed to believe what you believe. You had your playthrough, I had mine, that person had theirs. We all had different experiences of playing the game because that’s Bioware’s premise. And it’s fine. It’s okay that you think him a hateful villain with completely evil intentions. That’s all up for the debate Bioware wanted us to have.
However, the term “genocide” has extremely heavy implications, one that us as fans should not be tossing around lightly.
I’ve heard the debate for using the term “genocide”. That word, like using the word rape casually, carries heavy implications because it’s so strongly associated with real-life events of the Holocaust, the Rwanda genocide, etc.
Solas is a fictional character. He was once part of a world where magic was everywhere and things were awesome. Great. Then **** goes down and Solas puts up the Veil. He sleeps for like, a thousand years. He wakes up, finds that everything went awry, and oh damn - he made a huge mistake. Everything’s gone to ****. In his blink of an eye, the world was once perfect and now it’s not (according to him). So I have to revert it back to the way it was, meaning this world will be destroyed.
Have we forgotten what we did at Redcliffe when we were transported into the future? The world went to ****. And yet we decided this world was awful, and we went back to the past to revert it. We did the same thing Solas wants to do, and you can argue it all you want that the future was bad, evil, etc., but just as we can claim Solas is a villain or not, the writers have placed us in the same situation. We can argue for both whether they are similar or not, but this is definitely a technique the writers employed. It’s too subtle and brilliant for it not to be.
As one user fervently wrote in my reddit post, “That line of reasoning makes no sense. Why have a judicial system at all if having good intentions absolve you from committing an established evil and destructive act? Intent matters, yes, but not nearly enough to offset mass murder and planetary - scale destruction.Horrible people never consider themselves evil, by his perspective he’s in the right. This is not a grey area, he is evil.”
Everything about Solas is a grey area. The writers chose to give Cole, the spirit of Compassion, dialogue defending Solas (i.e. ”He’s not that kind of wolf”, “You weren’t wrong, though”, etc.). Because Solas’s abhorrent plan is mixed up with good intentions, this is definitely a grey area. (And if YOU guys didn’t know, intent can very much absolve you in a judicial system. Proving intent and motive in court can be the decisive factor in a sentence, in case you didn’t know.)
The ends do not justify the means. Solas’s intentions are not evil, but his means are. Yes, that makes his deeds one of a villain. He is a complicated villain. As Varric said, the coolest villains are the ones that don’t know they’re the villains. Solas doesn’t see him as one. That doesn’t mean he’s not, and that’s fine. But the writers have deliberately put too much room for doubt in Solas’s character for there to be no possibility of redeeming him, or stopping him. I have a feeling some kind of major choice will be given to us regarding Solas, and that’s what this ambiguity will lead up to.
But throwing around the word genocide as if Solas is chasing a fucked-up ideology where he commits mass murder on the idea that the world should be cleansed of an ethnic race is demeaning to the actual real-life events where it actually happened for this reason. Solas is a fictional character. The writers could not have made it any less clear that he’s a selfish character who wants to undo his mistakes. This makes him a child. He’s selfish, yes, he’s arrogant, he’s deluded about his goals, but the writers have thrown enough in there that makes us believe we’ll be given the choice to make him see what he’s planning is pure idiocy.
Ethnic cleansing is not his end. He does not see the current population as inferior and thus the world must be rid of it. He sees the current population in the state that it is because HE himself inflicted it. Actual figures who have committed genocide had one ideology and one ideology only: they believe in a master race. You as the Inquisitor can play as an elf, a human, a dwarf, or a Quanari. Being friends with Solas, he makes it clear that this is not his ideology.
Hell, does Solas even have an ideology? He’s just a self-deluded, arrogant ignoramus who wants to fix his mistakes. The way the writers presented him, I don’t think Solas even cares that much to bring glory back to his people. Solas is a guilt-ridden character. All he cares about is himself and fixing his mistake so he doesn’t feel so guilty about the world being fucked up now, in his eyes. The way to redeem him is to take away his guilt, and the way to do that is to show him that the world right now isn’t the horrible consequence of his actions that Solas sees it as.
And no, I’m not dismissing the fact that mass murder accounts into Solas’s plans. Of course he’s going to be a mass murderer if he goes through with his plans. He’s willing to be that bad guy to bring back what he thinks is the greater good. Solas is not Corypheus, he is not Voldemort. Not yet. He will be, if we let him. But so far as we know, Solas doesn’t want that choice to be the only one and he wants the Inquisitor to convince him otherwise.
I can hardly believe that many who are anti-Solas are more forgiving of Blackwall who actually committed murder for money.
This makes Solas a complicated character. This makes him an ambiguous character. This does not make him a person who will commit genocide. Those who stand by this word really need to get their real-life history in check and do some research into what genocides actually mean for us, the implications they have in political climates, how they’re written in various cultures, etc. While I see Solas as a anti-hero, a tragic hero, others see him as a villain and that’s fine - either way, he will make a fascinating character for all of us in DA4. But we need to stop throwing around the word genocide."
Source: http://ladyarlathan....op-calling-what