Oh, sorry if it sounded like I meant that I think she has to be seeing other people to be 'moved on'; that's not what I meant to convey at all. I've just come across a lot of content that was seriously acting as though the breakup didn't/couldn't occur solely because he still loves her, or because he didn't explain why, and so on (and creators who agreed with this position). And that I find legit creepy.
He revokes consent to be in an active relationship with her. That's all that's necessary. Doesn't matter how happy anyone was with the outcome. Lavellan needs to move on with her life, somehow, and especially over a period of two years, I'm unsettled by one who doesn't at all. Doesn't mean someone can't/shouldn't write it. But I object to that being portrayed as the ideal.
I don't understand why people think that two years is more than enough to move on. It could be for some, but it doesn't have to. My Lavellan didn't move on. Too early, to many things didn't add up. She wouldn't even think of starting another relationship. People deal differently with heartbreak and breaking up. As much as you're unsettled by Lavellan who didn't move on with her life, I find it quite unsettling to move on entirely that quickly.
And this comes to my mind right now:
'No one should tell you how to mourn. And when someone says 'move on,' you take their hand and say, 'my choice.''
btw. I need to play DA2 again.





Retour en haut






