I think he was just clarifying that the romance was only available to female elves, though, and not female elf for story reasons. I could be wrong, but I don't see what story reasons there could be due to gender aside from babies, and since whether they had sex or not is strictly up to headcanon I don't see that coming into play.
Which is exactly why I was musing why they've made that comment in the first place. I can't see it coming into play, but then why would they insist that it makes SUPER story sense?
Anyway - can't say that Weekes insisting to clarify that it's specifically for female elves twice isn't still kinda suspicious for me, but at this point I don't think it matters much - the story is left open-ended and many details may yet change, even if they have most of the plot well planned out already.





Retour en haut





