So, finally back from the holiday from hell, having used up 200MB of data in a week, I log on to a real computer for the first time to find I have fifty unread notifications on BSN. Wow. Remain awesome, you guys ![]()
Yup. And all Solas himself says is that his agent failed.
I think Knight Enchanter / Solas is not seeing WHERE my disagreement is. I do believe Solas is capable of killing, that was not the issue. But being a fan of Felassan, I found that the book described Felassan meeting someone he DID NOT LIKE, which to me was obviously not Fen'Harel to whom he was in awe. He went to the meeting with dread knowing his death would be inevitable, the "person" he was meeting would never rest until it killed him. That is definitely NOT SOLAS.
I think it's worth mentioning that most of Felassan's accounts of Fen'Harel are told as old dalish stories - partially so to appear authentically 'dalish' to Briala, I imagine, as well as to serve as topical fables. These old dalish tales could be complete fiction, semi-fictional tales which incorporate fanficial and fantasy elements alongside the turth, or just prettified accounts of real events and are mostly accurate - we have no way to gauge how much truth is in the events of the stories, as well as how much truth there is to Felassan's depction of Fen'Harel as a conniving trickster who outwitted his superiors. I would guess that Felassan's depiction is only one side of a very multi-faceted character - and I might even guess that Felassan is aware of much. Felassan wouldn't use stories of Fen'Harel as the ruthless tactician in order to spur on Briala, after all, the reality of plotting a revolution is much more mundane and much nastier than what makes for effective propaganda. Even if those stories are 100% true, they're limited by the fact that they only tell of Fen'Harel's deeds whilst the Evanuris reigned, presumably before the veil fell (an event which has definied Solas' ambitions and temperment since).
The confusion of fact and fiction - and the difficulty distinguishing between the two, especially after long periods of history have passed - is an important theme for not only any dalish character, but also for Lavellen and Solas in particular. In Trespasser, if you choose to tell Solas that the dalish were wrong about Fen'Harel based on what you saw in the murals at Fen'Harel's sanctury, Solas will note that it's just another story, just another spin on events, and doesn't represent the whole truth. What Solas is doing in that piece of dialogue is casting doubt onto all the stories that Felassan told - as they represented only a portion of his actions, prior to the veil's fall, and were constructed not as accounts but as fables and morality tales which serve as much better propaganda pieces. Much in the same way the devs say that DA's codex is a collection of different points of view and thus have some element of subjectivity to them, Solas is saying the same about stories of him. This isn't to deny that objective history or even objective reality exists (lol, let's not go there). But rather the way we approach reality retrospectively is coloured by different subjective accounts and muddled by things like faulty memory or a lack of a written word.
What I'm trying to say is that there is, thematically, and practically, a very good reason why what Felassan says about Solas does not match up with Felassan's fraught and distressed relationship with his master. Most of Felassan's dialogue is in earshot of Briala, for whom he he 1. upkeeping a facade, and 2. trying to nudge in a particular political direction. Most of Felassan's dialogue contributes to greater thematical discussions DA has about history, subjectivity, and memory when it comes to the relationships between modern and ancient elves. And most of Felassan's dialogue - if we are to assume he was killed by Solas here - also establish Solas as character who is complex, multi-faceted, and one who cannot be judged neither intentions nor actions alone (his intentions, as outlined in Felassan's stories, seem to contradict his only action - killing Felassan).
For those reasons, given what we've learnt about Solas in Trespasser, I believe he killed Felassan, or made him "disappear" somehow without killing him.





Retour en haut





