Hm, it seems we have a bit of a contradiction.
On the one hand Solas says to Bull than the Qun teaches the Qunari they are inherently savage, and he implies that the behaviour of violent Tal-Vashoth is culturally determined.
On the other hand, Solas says to Adaar that the Qunari are inherently savage and it's actually the Qun which prevents them from becoming savage. So here he holds a believe that their nature is purely biologically determined, essentialist, etc. Which is usually, IRL, a big red flashing warning sign saying 'racism, do not go here', although I suppose it makes a tiny bit more sense when you have four different species who count as people. Didn't stop my Adaar from being quietly offended and dumping Solas as a friend ASAP because that is rude.
I'd really, really prefer it to be the former - culturally determined - and not the latter. Beliefs, philosophies, opinions, are ultimately choices, even if you're pressured into thinking in a certain way by upbringing, peers, family, etc. - one is free to choose them, or at least change your mind after being forced to think a certain way from childhood. I would rather someone berate someone for their bad choices than for being human (or qunari, in this case). And if the qunari aren't inherently savage - which they clearly aren't, I mean, even the seemingly incorrigible Sten, in the very short period we knew him in Origins, softened and changed his views, Leliana catches him picking flowers, he has a weakness for cookies, he terrifies Morrigan by flirting back with her, to the extent he was sent to the re-educators, they have as much scope to change under different cultural settings as the rest of us - then they have potential to become people for Solas. Which I'd like, because the qunari are actually probably my favourite race to play (and I would have chosen to play a qunari mage were it not for how elf-centric DA:I is
).
Also, I think 'inherently savage race' is just such poor writing, especially given that BioWare have written such a nuanced and interesting game in terms of how groups of different socioeconmic backgrounds clash and conflict.
... Also, did anybody found it curious that elves seem to be veeeery susceptible to the Qun? In fact, I kind of get the feeling that in general they may be a bit more impressionable than others - maybe it's a legacy of them being somewhat closer to spirits than others, or maybe it's a legacy of rules of the Evanuris (well, most of them were slaves, so...) and the way they ruled them still holds some sort of tangible sway over them or how susceptible to certain influences they can be?
Sable touched on this, saying that it's targeted - which I agree. But I also think given that most elves live in quite desolate conditions, in poverty, long abandoned by their own gods and frowned upon by the chantry, often leading unfortunate lives with little purpose or security or certainty, the Qun has more appeal to them than a rich human lord who already is certain and secure in his wealth.