My problem is my HOF was a saint because I played her as one. And sorry to Alistair, but Loghain lived. His views of Duncan were overly biased. I know it's because of his life and how Duncan treated him, but unless it involved Duncan or his own family, Alistair never yelled at me for any other questionable thing I did. Wardens are not good, but I had hoped my HOF was going to change that.
It's already been said, but unfortunately the HoF is only one person in an organisation, and whilst their voice has power, they're relatively new and isolated, without allies. Changing something collective, more often that not, also involves a collective effort. I have a similar dilemma to you though - a couple of my Wardens took issue with some long-standing traditions of the Order, and I'd expect them to use their newfound political power as an Arlessa to instigate those changes. I tend to get around that by pretending that the quest to look for the cure for the calling was actually an exile in all but name, and a project which was hoped to lead nowhere, in order to place them out of the political arena.
I have...thoughts about my Warden and Eamon. Unfortunately, most of those thoughts involve cursing, violence, and possibly defenestration. It's a good thing Eamon wasn't Arl of Redcliffe in DA:I. I might have let Alexius keep the castle just to spite him.
I'm of a very similar mind. Eamon is a very savvy political schemer in my book, who abandoned his nephew because it was politically convenient, and then welcomed his nephew back because... it was politically convenient, hm. I always thought he'd use his influence over King Alistair for his own gains. It's actually one of the reasons why I'm fond of the hardened!King Alistair & Queen Anora outcome. Anora won't let Eamon walk all over him, but neither would Alistair let Anora have her way. The main difference in the Landsmeet outcome actually depends on whether my warden is an elf or not, as I don't tend to spare Loghain on elven playthroughs after discovering he was working with Tevinter slavers.
I have no forum etiquette, so I'm really, really sorry if this is rude or out of line. I just wanted to poke in and say hello-- and that I have loved reading your posts. I am stuck in this massive DA:I / Solas thing.
All of DA is incredible, but the writing of Solas is impeccable. I am an avid gamer and advocate of video games being accepted and treated as a respected art form. Because of this, I have spent a lot of time looking at games from a more academic standpoint vs gamer standpoint. Solas is the best written character I have encountered hands down. In fact, I think his character illustrates the concept of grey-area better than any other personification of such. I am a writer (published non-fiction) that struggles with massive, debilitating depression and have been left feeling "tranquil" for a few years. Solas' arc was so inspiring to me that I've grabbed hold of the obsession wave and am going to ride it as long as it's pushing me to be productive. I have done a bunch of fan art, wrote fan-fiction for the first time ever, and am finishing up a Lavellan costume for a pro photoshoot this Saturday.
Sorry to interrupt and go off topic, but I am so excited to see people who feel the same way I do! Sometimes you just need someone to nerd out with. 
Hello! Don't worry, you're never interrupting, this is a conversation with lots of people after all
. I'm really glad Solas has been important to you in that way.
Out of interest, what kind of non-fiction have you published? I'm speaking as someone who did her bachelor's in English and spent a lot of that justifying why what constitutes 'high' and 'low' culture, or 'trashy' and 'quality' art (and this includes video games, which have narratives and often function like films/books) is down primarily to politics and economics, and not aesthetic quality. What's more important to me is how you read, rather than what you read. Just wondering if it's anything to do with that sort of topic, or whether it's got nothing to do with it!