The threesome thing bothers me. Not as a concept for those who would like that sort of thing but just because it gets used so often as an annoying bi trope to the point it remains a stereotype lots of people believe is some kind of default in real life. And then there's Zevran and Isabela and Leliana and the Warden with that foursome in DAO. Mitigated a bit with DA2 and with DAI but it's more a personal pet peeve.
Which was also why I find the team actively considering harmful bisexuality tropes when it came to creating Solas to be really thoughtful.
I understand disliking it for how cliche it has become. Although you don't necessarily need to identify as bisexual to have sex with someone of the opposing and same sex. So the Zevran, Briala, and Celene hookup isn't entirely implausible (other than it is XD). I guess that's my opinion though *shrugs* sexual orientation and labeling and romantic vs sexual preferences and bicurious vs bisexual is all incredibly confusing. But people like to label, so we shall continue coming up with terms to classify people into certain categories...
Anywho, so this whole Solas being straight to avoid being a bi trope bothered me.
Originally I didn't know why. So I mulled it over, have chewed and finished digesting the issue, and here is my opinion.
I think that was an excuse. A good one no doubt, but an excuse nonetheless.
TV tropes says the depraved bisexual is "the cold-blooded murderous sociopaths". That seems so very far off from Solas, an yes I know I'm biased towards his goodness, but even if he fit the category. Does this mean you shy away from that? No, it means you create characters, ie Josephine, who are a contrast to the trope and show that you aren't making a walking stereotype. The problem with using TV tropes (which I love) is that they have a "trope" for eeveeerrryyy behavior. This is possibly due to the nothing is original anymore, but that's an argument for another day. Back to the point, they said Solas was not bisexual because they didn't want him to be a trope. First, they didn't think about that with Bull? Or maybe they didn't want multiple tropes... but all the characters can fit into tropes (KISA, tsundere, Disney princess, ect.). I don't think I would have ever perceived a bisexual Solas as a stereotype or trope. His character is just so different from what comes to mind when you think of the depraved bisexual. Bull on the other hand fits the category well, wouldn't he be the more creative to steer away from the trope, not Solas? Second, they could have made Solas gay. They answered why he wasn't bisexual, but why not why he wasn't gay?
I think the most likely reason Solas is straight (why not gay I assume social limitations) is due to funding and time limitations. The reasoning that was give, in my most humble and very cynical opinion this late hour, was an excuse.
By the way I know this is sort of an incoherent mess. I'm in the awkward middle ground of sleepy in the mind but not in the body XD





Retour en haut





