Good points have been made one all sides of this discussion. I too can see why they didn't include the scene. I get it, but I don't like it. I would have liked the option to make the physical intimacy non-head-canon because, like you said, I just want more Solas period. I would have appreciated repeatable kissy kissy scene too. My husband keeps triggering his kissy kissy scene with Cassandra when I'm in the room just to rub it in my face! BP
The "you can head-canon whatever you want" vague dialogue stuff made the whole situation muddled. I never even considered that Solas and Lavellan could have done the deed until weird things starting coming out of the characters' mouths that seemed totally unrelated to the dialogue wheel text I'd selected. I personally don't know if my own Lavellan made it with Elfy McSchmexy Pants or not. I'll probably figure that out in the next game. Maybe? I'm so confused.
Since we are talking about dubious consent and people feeling like their characters were taken advantage of...why do you all suppose BioWare went ahead with the Blackwall sex scene? I've never played through that romance, but I watched gamermd83 do it. How is that not as bad/rapey? The dude gets what he wants from you, while you are still in the dark about his past, then abandons you in the morning. Is it just that Blackwall isn't the Dalish devil and he only killed a few innocent people? Solas is at least honest about his name.
Yes! I'm so glad someone agrees. (And yes, even a repeatable kissy-kissy scene would have been something at least.)
This is exactly what I was trying to get at. TBH, if I had decided to romance Blackwall for some reason the first time around, I would really have felt dirtied by having a physical relationship with him. I think the only distinction they're making here is ancient elf/sort of god = more traumatizing than 'just a man' who turns out to be a murderer who killed an entire family (including children). Yeah, not seeing how that was any better, seeing as Solas was leading a bloody revolution for a just cause and his intention hadn't been to kill so many people through his actions, they were just 'collateral damage' - which says something about his character, yes, but that's not the same as murdering for hire just to further some underhanded political gain that he didn't even believe in, and putting aside the fact that his actions were wrong in and of themselves, he chose to slaughter the entire family just to save his skin, rather than solve his problem another way. I won't even mention the dog story, yikes. Yes, he's repentant. Great. So is Solas.
Solas being "the Dalish devil" is a dramatic analogy, but I've never really felt such a great association between our devil and him. I see much more of an association between Corypheus or pretty much any of the more powerful demons you come across, though technically I can see where that comes from. Yet, we know that Dalish history is more than a little incomplete and skewed - we know that we misunderstood Fen'Harel entirely, and all Trespasser proved was that OK, he was much better than we thought, and yes, he also kind of deserves the bad rap for some of his more dramatic choices - but ultimately he is like a lot of other revolutionaries who are willing to get their hands dirty: it can go askew very, very quickly and the price you pay may suddenly be more than what the outcome is worth. How you judge the motivating intentions is subjective from that point onward.
I'd still say it's just not the same (but then, considering my personal views I admit that I am heavily biased).