I don't know about this. It kinda undermines personal agency, don't you think?
I have to say, I really dislike the idea that relying on friends or some support from time to time apparently undermines someone's agency, just like sometimes I see people argue about it in case of some choices we make, apparently "for" other companions. It doesn't - it's simply a fact of life: we are social creatures. Sometimes we rely on others, more often than not when in tight spot (and, chances are, that they may come time that they'd rely on us for a change).
Both in life as well in DAI the characters are constructed in a way that they choose to take your input into consideration - they like you (if you've gained enough of their approval) and they choose to put their trust in you in order for them to go through some sort of personal problem.
So really, how does that undermine personal agency, I wonder? Is it really such a shame to admit that sometimes we need a bit of help, or don't see clearly what has to be done and it might be wise to perhaps not be stubborn about our own ability to push through no matter of circumstances?
If Solas was like this, would he even consider changing his mind about people of modern Thedas not being people? He killed Felassan over that, yet a few years of being around them and influence of decent Inquisitor (Solas directly states "you showed me that I was wrong") and he's forced to reconsider his stance. IMO it's a credit to both Solas and the world: Solas, for being open-minded and receptive to people around him, and the world being still full of people inspiring hope for the better.
The idea that people are settled into a given course of action, a certain mindset, or a certain fate unless an outside force (the player) act upon the character to "save" him/her. What's to say this outside force is even a good influence? Or the right influence, rather. We can push Leliana either way and both results could be argued to be the right one. Perhaps Blackwall was always going to turn himself in and answer for his crimes. Perhaps dying in the place of the man they were about to hang was his redemption. Perhaps Solas was on the right path all along, and it is the player who blindsided him, and put him in the wrong path. Perhaps someday a different part of history would paint my Inquisitor as the villain in this story, the heartless traitor who sided with the others to undermine the restoration of her people. I don't know... I'd like to think that even should people fail and fall into despair for a time, eventually, some will find the strength within to save themselves.
This is exactly where trust comes in - and one thing we know about Solas is that he's gone so far off the deep end that he can't even trust the love of his life. So if there ever was a person who needs to be reminded that there are actually people who haven't yet given up on him, and willing to help him, it's him.
And I'm not saying that we can necessarily make right decision - I surely do hope that we''d be able to fail if we make wrong decisions in DA4. But this is where realistic story conflict can kick in in earnest: are you enough to make an actual difference, not just for the world, but for your friend?
I'm also not sure why you keep treating my comments as if I'm speaking in absolutes. Just like before I didn't imply that this is ALL about learned helplessness, nowhere there I implied that trusting in others is ALL that is needed. Obviously, the impulse to change, push through or even make a choice to listen to a friend must come from a person - though I'd like to remind that there are circumstances in life that push people so far that indeed without some support of others they personally don't see their way out. Many times it involves other people simply reminding that they indeed have that personal strength to save themselves, but they still have to be reminded of it - as spirit!Cole says that he will be there for Solas to remind him who he is.
Also... l really don't see what part of Solas's history put him in this learned helplessness category. He was/is a powerful mage, a revered leader to his people. He's led numerous slaves in a rebellion against their oppressors. Yes, he has seen a lot of pain and death and loss, but I haven't seen anything that's broken him yet (well, except for loving someone he maybe shouldn't). He remains convinced of his purpose, even if love/friendship made him hesitate for a little while there. I just don't see how this learned helplessness applies to him. His mistakes were his own. Every step of the way, he has been agent to his choices. Yes, the consequences of his actions hasn't been great, but feeling sadness or regret for what he's unwittingly done in order to help his people is not the same as falling into hopelessness and giving up. You ask him what the alternative would have been had he not stopped the elven gods and he says "the evanuris would have destroyed the entire world." He believes he's done the right thing, still. And I kinda believe he has as well.





Retour en haut





