Really, if there is any group who deserves to whine it is the a-sexuals, we get nothing, so you can all stop your whinging and be grateful you get at least 1 companion of your orientation.
You have nine amazing companions to befriend ![]()
Really, if there is any group who deserves to whine it is the a-sexuals, we get nothing, so you can all stop your whinging and be grateful you get at least 1 companion of your orientation.
You have nine amazing companions to befriend ![]()
I have been correct about literally every character i have done this with.
Whether or not you choose to believe me is irrelevant.
I can usually predict how much I will like a character as soon as i get some details from Bioware.
This is a meaningless statement. You could just as well confirm your own bias toward a certain character any way you pleased. Basically, you could simply determine a character to be a total dillhole based on appearance, or a brief character bio, and then use any example you wanted to "prove" it.
Guest_StreetMagic_*
'Plays violin'
oh look, more whining from some straight,gay,lesbian, and bi people.
Really, if there is any group who deserves to whine it is the a-sexuals, we get nothing, so you can all stop your whinging and be grateful you get at least 1 companion of your orientation.
I think Shale is the best friend you have. ![]()
Not a bad thing.
This is a meaningless statement. You could just as well confirm your own bias toward a certain character any way you pleased. Basically, you could simply determine a character to be a total dillhole, and then use any example you wanted to "prove" it.
So...Im wrong that i predicted what characters i liked?
As i said, i cant prove it, but my track record has been almost flawless.
Considering what this thread is, i dont feel im in the wrong for saying that i dont like the romance options.
I have been correct about literally every character i have done this with.
Whether or not you choose to believe me is irrelevant.
I can usually predict how much I will like a character as soon as i get some details from Bioware.
This is hilarious. I am now half-convinced that this guy and OP are trolls. Which means only two things left to do.
Guest_Morrigan_*

You have nine amazing companions to befriend
The issue is that they still want the romance, but without the sex scene/s. They're a difficult bunch.
To go back to the cake metaphor, it's like eating the cake and appreciating the cake without putting your penis in the cake.
The issue is they they still want the romance, but without the sex scene/s. They're a difficult bunch.
To go back to the cake metaphor, it's like eating the cake and appreciating the cake without putting your penis in the cake.
Anyone else have a strange craving for cake now? ![]()
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Sten said the cake is a lie.
Probably asexual himself too.
Anyone else have a strange craving for cake now?
This is hilarious. I am now half-convinced that this guy and OP are trolls. Which means only two things left to do.
So its trolling to not like characters based on moderately extensive information detailing personality now, eh?
Anyone else have a strange craving for cake now?
Cake coitus, yes.
I think I've been asexual until now.
So...Im wrong that i predicted what characters i liked?
As i said, i cant prove it, but my track record has been almost flawless.
Considering what this thread is, i dont feel im in the wrong for saying that i dont like the romance options.
Anyone who selectively focuses on information that confirms their hypotheses can have a flawless track record in predicting what they won't like. That is why it is meaningless to declare it at all. It's more likely to indicate confirmation bias than any predictive powers on your part.
Anyone else have a strange craving for cake now?
Maria stole my thought
![]()
Guest_StreetMagic_*
People can easily weigh the characters on little information. They're all archetypes. Even Bioware markets the archetype. "The Muscle". "The Believer". etc..
But I still think we should drop this. The romances are not going to change.
So its trolling to not like characters based on moderately extensive information detailing personality now, eh?
A promotional profile page is NOT "extensive information", Einstein. ![]()
Until we actually PLAY the game, we don't know enough about the character to pass such rash judgments.
Also, you declared that your PRE-RELEASE assumptions are accurate, which shows that either you have a superiority complex or you're posting here for the attention.
Anyone who selectively focuses on information that confirms their hypotheses can have a flawless track record in predicting what they won't like. That is why this is meaningless.
Or maybe what happened was that i read the information that they gave me on characters, and said "I dont think i'll like this one" and played the games and ended up not liking the character.
But I still think we should drop this. The romances are not going to change.
I'm only here for the cake.
A promotional profile page is NOT "extensive information", Einstein.
It literally exists for one purpose. To give personality information for characters in the game.
But thank you for the compliment. Im not sure what i did to be compared with Einstein, but thats high praise indeed.
I'm only here for the cake.
The cake is a lie!
Companion cake molds semi-confirmed for Winter 2014 ![]()
Guest_Trojan.Vundo_*
You have nine amazing companions to befriend
The cake is a lie!

Okay, I'm going to assume you mean well but are misinformed. A- sexuals are not sexually attracted to anyone and have no desire for sex.(I'm not getting to the whole spectrum thing.) But they still have romantic feelings for other people, and experience love, just without sex.( omg love without sex The horror!)
Yeah, like I said. Difficult.