No in fact i'm not. I wouldn't included Cullen in as an advisor and i would had gave to the inquisitor a past that was able to support his elevation as head of a organization such as the inquisition (but maybe this was covered by Bioware).
I will pass over this point as i've always done in all of this years but i really hope that people will have the balls to not start moaning on how the story in inquisition was "cliche" because maker preserve them cause i will not.
An old general retired from age of the Orlesian army? A paied mercenary with decades of experience?
A lot of archetype could fill that role.
I won't moan - though personally, I preferred the Hawke-style 'rise to power' type of story to the epic 'save the world even though you're technically a nobody' thing (I realise I'm probably in the minority
)
But why would those archetypes be any better at the job than Cullen? I could argue that a retired Orlesian general would be far too invested in the political situation in Orlais to be of any use outside of that, that his advice could be extremely partisan within the Orlesian situation, depending on his allegiances, or that he'd be too old and worn out to be of any physical use to the Inquisition at all. A mercenary, with no loyalty to anything aside from the contents of his own pockets, has no vested interest at all in restoring order, chaos works for him because it means more employment. Also, how would such an individual have any more experience than Cullen at commanding a massive army? Basically, there can be arguments for and against any character who fills Cullen's role, just as there are arguments for and against Cullen himself.





Retour en haut





