Do you want to bet if he'll necro it a third time if we don't?
He is the last of the elvhenan and never again shall he submit?
Do you want to bet if he'll necro it a third time if we don't?
He is the last of the elvhenan and never again shall he submit?
Did someone say NECROMANCY?!
In any case what does it matter if the dalish myths are right or wrong? Those pathetic stories and heresies got destroyed by the glory that is the Tevinter Imperium and so it should stay in oblivion!
He got the last word in though. That means he wins on this forum. Everyone admit that Lob was right.
How would you simply conduct yourself with some maturity and discuss things civilly? I made it clear I disagreed with Dean's assertion that the Dalish are comparable to the Taliban; nothing I said warranted personal attacks against me. You're welcome to actually discuss the matter with me if you wish to, or even follow raging monkey or Mystic's suggestion to actually discuss Dalish folklore lore, but I didn't say anything to warrant any personal attacks against me. I don't think that's too much to ask for.
How would you simply conduct yourself with some maturity and discuss things civilly?
By all means, but you first. Necroing the same dead thread twice over to get the last word in is hardly civil or mature. If you're going to resort to childish behaviour expect people to call you out on it.
No Lob, usually when people stop talking they're done. No one was waiting for you to take a few weeks, or a few months, to respond.
Having to be constantly on the move, must be some bad connection there in the woods.
How would you simply conduct yourself with some maturity and discuss things civilly? I made it clear I disagreed with Dean's assertion that the Dalish are comparable to the Taliban; nothing I said warranted personal attacks against me. You're welcome to actually discuss the matter with me if you wish to, or even follow raging monkey or Mystic's suggestion to actually discuss Dalish folklore lore, but I didn't say anything to warrant any personal attacks against me. I don't think that's too much to ask for.
Sure it is. No one wants to discuss the matter with you, and yet you keep bringing it back up.
Right now, in this thread, you're that uncool kid in class who keeps talking about an old fad well after everyone else has moved on. When pointed out that everyone else has moved on and would rather the discussion fade, your response is to try and repeat the topic. Which is why you're an uncool kid.
If anyone else were interested in the discussion, they could post in it- or even post a new thread. They aren't. You just keep bringing back necromancy.
By all means, but you first. Necroing the same dead thread twice over to get the last word in is hardly civil or mature. If you're going to resort to childish behaviour expect people to call you out on it.
I addressed all the points Dean previously brought up when he said the Dalish were comparable to the Taliban; that doesn't warrant personal attacks against me, which seems to be the entirety of every response made by people who have since participated in this thread. There's nothing childish about disagreeing with someone; there is a severe lack of composure when people feel the need to start mudslinging because I returned after a long absence and make some points in disagreement in an old thread.
Mudslinging also doesn't equate to calling someone out; insulting someone doesn't equal calling someone out.
Having to be constantly on the move, must be some bad connection there in the woods.
The Dalish get bad wifi service ![]()
The Dalish get bad wifi service
Maybe they should cut off hala horns and try and use them as antenna.
The Dalish get bad wifi service
They be stealing it from humans. I smell oppression!
But a drink each time Lob mentions talibans and necros.
There's nothing childish about disagreeing with someone; there is a severe lack of composure when people feel the need to start mudslinging because I returned after a long absence and make some points in disagreement in an old thread.
No you see that is the problem. There is nothing childish about disagreeing with someone. But it does come across as exceedingly childish to continuously revive dead conversations to 'make some points of disagreement'. Seemingly, you're the only one that doesn't understand that trying to sneak in the last word is poor form and poor taste.
Mudslinging also doesn't equate to calling someone out; insulting someone doesn't equal calling someone out.
It's not mudslinging when people are accurately calling you out on your behaviour, even if they make light of it while doing so.