Hi Allan, I think it is wishful thinking to assume that the playing field will be level everywhere. IMHO it is better to be realistic and set realistic expectations accordingly. How long ago was segregation as an example outlawed, but even today it still exists. The video game industry is after all in the business to ultimately make money, and it is becoming harder to find games that are not generic. What's my point: don't compromise the quality of games. Some crusades end in martyrdom, and there is no victory.
This just reinforces the problem. It's privileged and advantaged to say "lets just set realistic expectations." It does nothing to weaken my resolve in this matter, however (it probably strengthens it). While I won't disagree that, sadly, it's wishful thinking to assume that people can actually be respectful to each other, that doesn't mean I'll stop advocating for it.
My statement, however, indicated the word "ideally." I recognize it's an ideal.
If you think that this undermines the quality of the games, then you're telling me that you feel the existence of LGBT content is a problem, and with the implied threat of "no victory" (i.e. our financial ruin), then the reality is that if you don't advocate as well, your inaction and willingness to defer to the status quo will have allowed a game company that you presumably enjoy go out of business because of things like sexism and homophobia. Because doing nothing is the same as siding with the privileged.
(it should be noted that I don't believe us seeking to be inclusive will be bad for us, but I guess time will tell)