The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Discussion - take 2
#2851
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 12:36
#2852
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 12:40
Surprised it's only 5, and I wasn't even expecting much from the import. Clearly only the big decisions will be taken into account. Oh well.
#2853
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 12:48
It is: Spare Aryn or not, Ioverth or Roche, Triss or Ioverth/Roche, Save Sile or not and Kill Letho or not.
In all answers Geralt say something about it, so we know if Letho lives, he is hiding from Nilfgaard, a make a note about it long ago, it seems correct.
- The Elder King, Dutchess, Han Shot First et 1 autre aiment ceci
#2854
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 12:51
ThanksIt is: Spare Aryn or not, Ioverth or Roche, Triss or Ioverth/Roche, Save Sile or not and Kill Letho or not.
In all answers Geralt say something about it, so we know that if Letho lives, he is hiding from Nilfgaard, a make a note about it long ago, it seems correct.
#2855
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 12:58
Yassssssss, Sign Mastery, here I come!
The combat use of signs seems much more fluid this time, def gonna be more interesting. Kinda loving the stuns.
#2856
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 01:01
Thanks
.
No problem.
In the same region you can see the status of kingdoms, then Henselt be alive or not, he lose his kingdom anyway, this explains the fact of not being important question about it.
#2857
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 01:27
No problem.
In the same region you can see the status of kingdoms, then Henselt be alive or not, he lose his kingdom anyway, this explains the fact of not being important question about it.
I guess that means he also lose his life or at least Radovid put him out of the picture, whether you spared him or not in Roche's path.
#2858
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 02:56

Ciri stronk
I gotta say I love her high heels
#2859
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 03:29
Any word on Roche and Iorveth showing up?
#2860
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 03:40
Any word on Roche and Iorveth showing up?
Roche confirmed as of a few pages ago.

#2861
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 05:28
yet I was listening to the video review of a french website and the guy keep praising the story. I'm so tired of IGN. The site that give 5.9 to Alien isolation and 9.0 to Evolve ( Of course they gave 9.0 to evolve. They were so pushing this game down ours throat before release. Half the articles was about evolve for over two month)
IGN staff is a bunch of sellout conceited bunghole
You can't spell the word Ignorant without IGN.
- Dominic_910 aime ceci
#2862
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 07:04
Roche confirmed as of a few pages ago.
Are there any conditions for him to appear? Or is it just go one his route.
#2863
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 07:31
Are there any conditions for him to appear? Or is it just go one his route.
I think on he's very likely to appear if you choose Roche's path in TW2, and maybe it doesn't matter that you must help him rescue Anais in chapter 3, but I hope both Roche and Iorveth appear regardless of which path the player choose in TW2.
#2864
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 07:54
It is: Spare Aryn or not, Ioverth or Roche, Triss or Ioverth/Roche, Save Sile or not and Kill Letho or not.
In all answers Geralt say something about it, so we know if Letho lives, he is hiding from Nilfgaard, a make a note about it long ago, it seems correct.
Wait... why is Letho hiding from Nilfgaard? I thought they will be on his side especially after he successfully plunged North into chaos and allowing Nilfgaard to invade again. Did Emhyr broke his promise about giving Witchers their own land and schools or did i miss something in TW2?
#2865
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 07:58
Letho was just a catspaw in Emhyr's schemes, so there is always the possibility that the emperor double crossed him. Or it could be that the emperor was displeased that Letho failed.
- Bayonet Hipshot aime ceci
#2866
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 08:32
Letho was just a catspaw in Emhyr's schemes, so there is always the possibility that the emperor double crossed him. Or it could be that the emperor was displeased that Letho failed.
That's gotta be one awkward chat with Geralt. Since he's the one that foiled Emhyr's plans in the end.
Though Emhyr might not care. The north is basically already his anyway. His plan succeeded.
#2867
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 08:39
That's gotta be one awkward chat with Geralt. Since he's the one that foiled Emhyr's plans in the end.
Though Emhyr might not care. The north is basically already his anyway. His plan succeeded.
Temaria and Keadwyn are already buttfucked at the start of the game.
It's a real shame we don't have a zone in the nilfgaardian controlled area. Beyond white orchard that is, a proper one with Vizima and Murky waters would've been nice. It'd be bad if we had another FNV legion situation with it, where you only ever see the military side of the Nilfgaardians and the civilian side is left untouched. Obviously we can't actually go into Nilfgaard, but it'd be nice to see how they treat the people in Tameria.
Also, who doesn't want to see Vizima and Murky Waters again in modern graphics and HD? At least we get to see Kaer Morhen in all its glory.
#2868
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 08:56
Kaedwen actually has a very interesting situation, but its a spoiler so I won't post it here.
#2869
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:11
I wouldn't give up on Temeria just yet. What about John Natalis?
It seems that every other person you meet took part in the last war against Nilfgaard. Such are the times in which we live. Yet we best remember those who made their mark in the annals of that conflict. John Natalis, Constable of Temeria, is one such person. Supreme commander of the cumulative forces of the North at the Battle of Brenna, Natalis fought valiantly, commanded wisely, and contributed vastly to the victory, despite being outnumbered by the enemy two-to-one. And he did not rest on his laurels after the battle. Instead, he pursued the foe, routing him nec nuntius cladis or nerly so, leaving but a few stragglers to flee beyond the Yaruga. John Natalis was honored richly for his deeds, and a square in Vizima now bears his name.
After Foltest's death, Natalis temporarily served as a regent of Temeria.
If Geralt chooses to rescue Triss:
As a patriot and a soldier, he was the ideal, apolitical candidate for the position of interrex. These same traits, however, meant that he lacked the support of powerful nobles and thus could not speak with a united voice for Temeria as a whole.
If Geralt chooses to rescue Anaïs and not to give her to Radovid V:
Natalis had fought many battles, but the one he fought for Temeria's independence at the summit in Loc Muinne was surely his most challenging. With King Foltest's daughter as his ward, he gained the chance to preserve the sovereignty of the state he temporarily governed.
I had Geralt rescue Anaïs but didn't hand her over to Radovid.
#2870
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:14
It is: Spare Aryn or not, Ioverth or Roche, Triss or Ioverth/Roche, Save Sile or not and Kill Letho or not.
In all answers Geralt say something about it, so we know if Letho lives, he is hiding from Nilfgaard, a make a note about it long ago, it seems correct.
Have you seen that if Letho is dead or alive is one of the barber questions? I'm asking because I have read on another forum that one of the questions is if Henselt is alive or not and Letho isn't mentioned.
#2871
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:14
I still can't decide between Roche and Iorveth for my Witcher 3 story.
#2872
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:20
I wouldn't give up on Temeria just yet. What about John Natalis?
I had Geralt rescue Anaïs but didn't hand her over to Radovid.
I don't know man. Temeria seems pretty fucked regardless of the choices you make.
But I do wonder what will happen if we choose to save Anais and gave her either to Radovid or John Natalis.
#2873
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:28
Day 1 patch notes for PS4.
#2874
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:33
Brothers in arms? Yep, perfect.
I want to sit around with Roche, remisnicing about the time we travelled to paradise on ******'s asses and complain how kids nowadays havê it só easy they won't even button their shirts up.
#2875
Posté 14 mai 2015 - 09:57
I wouldn't give up on Temeria just yet. What about John Natalis?
I had Geralt rescue Anaïs but didn't hand her over to Radovid.
Me too, although it had to do with protecting Adda, as Roche believed Radovid might get rid of her and marry Anais to have a better go at the Temerian throne. So no. Radovid left some thugs behind as revenge, so between that and his face of satisfaction at the mage massacre, I´m not too fond of him right now.
BTW, Emhyr is very much a no nonsense guy, but not a card carrying villain, he won´t do something evil for kicks unless provoked (the guy who once cursed him for instance).. Letho did quite a few things right, so It´s unlikely he had him killed.





Retour en haut





