7114 réponses à ce sujet

[I SOLD MY SOUL TO BIOWARE]

Well, small world. Just bumped into Lambert on a contract. First Letho, now him. Area's teeming with Witchers. :S

[Cunning Villain]

A question for those of you who have beaten the game (if you're out there):

 

Spoiler

I just arrived on Skellige and I've finished the Velgen/Novigrad main quests. How far am I through the main story? I'm considering staying on "No Man's Land," as I fear I'm progressing too quickly.

[LPPrince]

I know y'all are progressing too quickly because judging by all the posts without spoiler tags, y'all have advanced far faster than I have.

 

Currently-

 

Spoiler

I'm about to meet the Botchling.

[HoonDing]

I'm getting tired of all the dumb spinning of Geralt when attacking.

 

W1 fighting animations were so much better. Fast style actually felt fast without looking like a ballerina.

[Bayonet Hipshot]

By the way how do you get better at Gwent ? I'm having my arse handed to me in Gwent. 

[Cunning Villain]

I hate Gwent with a burning passion, and I've come to realize that I just hate all card games in video games. Caravan, Gwent, those card games in the Assassin's Creed series -- especially AC III -- that I can't be bothered to remember, et cetera.

[LPPrince]

By the way how do you get better at Gwent ? I'm having my arse handed to me in Gwent. 

 

Divide and conquer. When you get your initial hand, think of strategies you can use with them. Examples-

 

If I have a bunch of siege cards that are worth a ton and a card that doubles the strength of all cards in its row, I want to match them up for huge points for a round.

 

If I've got a card(lets call it card one) that brings back a card from the discard pile(card two) when its played and a decoy card along with it, I can play the former(card one) to bring back a card I used in an earlier round(card two), then use the decoy on card one, play card one again, and bring back another card(card three) from the discard pile. 

 

If I can get my opponent to use up as many of their cards unnecessarily as possible in the first round thats great;I can then win the next two pretty easily with planned attacks. Basically thinking a couple rounds ahead.

 

Its all foresight. You need to have a plan in mind right as you're offered the opportunity to switch cards at the start of a game. Then implement it or change accordingly depending on the opponents skill level.

 

That way you can own an opponent, for example in a game I played against a merchant earlier the score went-

 

First round- Merchant 16, Geralt 0

Second round- Merchant 0, Geralt 1

Third round- Merchant 21, Geralt 76

 

(it was something like that)

 

Plan plan plan.

[slimgrin]

So which game has the best intro? To me it's TW2 by a landslide. TW3 is a tutorial through and through, but not much attention was paid to the story aspect, the plot parts that get you hooked. The previous Witcher games at least did that, but TW3 just teaches you lore and mechanics, and you're on your way. There is very little to draw you in. Not even Yen's ass, as we already get naked Triss in the last intro, and in that case we actually got to converse with her.

[I SOLD MY SOUL TO BIOWARE]

Anyone know what that atmospheric track that plays in Novigrad at night is called? So gud. :3

 

So which game has the best intro? To me it's TW2 by a landslide. TW3 is a tutorial through and through, but not much attention was paid to the story aspect, the plot parts that get you hooked. The previous Witcher games at least did that, but TW3 just teaches you lore and mechanics, and you're on your way. There is very little to draw you in. Not even Yen's ass, as we already git naked Triss in the last intro, and in that case we actually got to converse with her.

 

Hard to beat the siege on the La Valletes/Foltest's assassination, really. I did like the Kaer Morhen dream this game for nostalgia feels though. 

[Milan92]

The Witcher 2 had the best intro.

-naked triss
-epic siege
-letho
-foltest
-naked triss

[Bayonet Hipshot]

The Witcher 2 had the best intro.

-naked triss
-epic siege
-letho
-foltest
-naked triss

 

The Witcher 3 had naked Yenn and Vesemir.

 

So who is better naked ? Naked Triss or Nake Yenn ?  

 

EDIT :- The Witcher 3 intro had naked Yenn, and Vesemir.

 

*freaking punctuation*

[I SOLD MY SOUL TO BIOWARE]

The Witcher 3 had naked Yenn and Vesemir.

 

I never saw naked Vesemir anywhere.

[Bayonet Hipshot]

I never saw naked Vesemir anywhere.

 

Goddamnit punctuation ! This is my actual sentence or the sentence I wanted to say :- The Witcher 3 intro had naked Yenn, and Vesemir.

[Han Shot First]

I never saw naked Vesemir anywhere.

 

Thank Melitele.

[Ozzy]

Excuse you. Vesemir is best waifu. 

[CrazyRah]

Excuse you. Vesemir is best waifu. 

 

Top tier waifu

 

One would be insane to not appreciate his quality

[Tensoconix]

LMAO is this real?

http://fat.gfycat.co...hwaterclam.webm

[Akrabra]

LMAO is this real?

http://fat.gfycat.co...hwaterclam.webm

Can't be, my Geralt cannot even jump over a simple fence in Novigrad. 

[Akrabra]

I'm getting tired of all the dumb spinning of Geralt when attacking.

 

W1 fighting animations were so much better. Fast style actually felt fast without looking like a ballerina.

Yeah gameplay wise i don't like this game that much to be honest. Alchemy is all about **** hits the fan now and not preperation, you don't have to brew regularly you just have to do it once and then meditate to gain the potions back (aslong as you have alcohol.) The sword play is ok, but its to much hitting on others guards or rolling. The counter attack system on the other hand is solid, and much better than what is presented in the Arkham games. 

 

I liked the fighting in the first game, because it felt like that is how the Witchers fight, the rythm in the combat as you charge up the combos. That is ofc based on my impressions from the game not anything else. Problem with it was the same as now, fighting becomes to easy after a while and abit boring. At the moment in The Witcher 3 i am just hacking my way through anything, i don't really have to stop and think and prepare like i had to in the previous games. I am not playing at the hardest, but the one just below. Oh and the fall damage is insane, i lost 1/10 of my hp jumping off a ledge which was a meter over the ground, a meter!

 

I could continue the rant on how i don't really like the crafting system in general, the inventory, the leveling and ability system pretty much anything gameplay related. But then again the story and characters are so great that i don't care about it when i play, its stuff i think about after playing. DA:I had many issues aswell, but i liked the story and the characters to much to care about the rest and that is the what makes a good game for me. Everything has flaws, but when the flaws dissapear in the greatness it doesn't matter.

[Paragon Gabriel]

People think TW1 fighting wasn't like a ballerina? Lol

That game it was exactly like ballet, with all those ridiculous front flips and doing three circles before an attack. TW3 is more solid.

[Bayonet Hipshot]

http://segmentnext.c...racter-endings/

 

So here is a link that details most of the endings for The Witcher 3. Don't click if you don't want to be spoiled, you have been warned.

 

Personally, I like the game endings a lot. There is genuine sense of closure in them, unlike that certain game with 3 shades of colors for endings...Ahem...

 

For my  canon playthrough...

 

Spoiler

I am going to romance Yennefer and let Geralt live the happily ever after life with her, keep Ciri alive, keep Keira Metz alive, rescue the mages out of Novigrad, make Cerys the ruler of Skellige and have Radovid dead. I hate that SOB for his witch hunts on non-humans and magic users.  

 

However, I still cannot decide if I want to let Emyhr take over the North or let Djikstra take control of Novigrad. I also am still indecisive with letting Ciri either be a Witcheress or Empress of Nilfgaard. I don't hate Emyhr, in fact, I actually have a lot of respect for that man despite my disagreement with his goals of conquering the world and what have you. He has balls and guts. To me, he is a better version of Radovid without the need to go on a non-human or magic user killing spree. The same goes for Ciri. She would make an excellent Empress as well as an excellent Witcheress but I don't know which is best for her, if you will. 

 

Cheers. 

[Tensoconix]

Yeah gameplay wise i don't like this game that much to be honest. Alchemy is all about **** hits the fan now and not preperation, you don't have to brew regularly you just have to do it once and then meditate to gain the potions back (aslong as you have alcohol.) The sword play is ok, but its to much hitting on others guards or rolling. The counter attack system on the other hand is solid, and much better than what is presented in the Arkham games. 

 

I liked the fighting in the first game, because it felt like that is how the Witchers fight, the rythm in the combat as you charge up the combos. That is ofc based on my impressions from the game not anything else. Problem with it was the same as now, fighting becomes to easy after a while and abit boring. At the moment in The Witcher 3 i am just hacking my way through anything, i don't really have to stop and think and prepare like i had to in the previous games. I am not playing at the hardest, but the one just below. Oh and the fall damage is insane, i lost 1/10 of my hp jumping off a ledge which was a meter over the ground, a meter!

I never rely on a game forcing me to fight in a satisfying way. When I approached W2 for the first time, I was like "oh whatever, I'll suffer through the combat somehow" after seeing videos of people spamming light attacks until enemy dies - rolling - spamming light attacks until enemy parries, etc. Eventually I ended up having a lot of fun just by using everything at my disposal, all signs, bombs, traps, throwing daggers and approaching each fight differently. Not because I needed to, but because it was fun.

 

I'll never uderstand people who play for 'maximum efficiency' and then complain how the gameplay is boring because the most effective style happens to involve mashing 2 buttons or something. Do you play games to prove something/to exploit their defficiencies or to have fun?(general rhetorical question, not a response) If the game does not force you to play in an entertaining way, make your own fun. It's extremely difficult to design a combat system that would not get exploited sooner or later. If a player skips entire aspects of the gameplay because they don't need them to win, there is noone else to blame for making it boring. 

 

Motto of the day: Create. Your. Own. Challenge.

[Call Me Jord]

Can't be, my Geralt cannot even jump over a simple fence in Novigrad. 

 

Mine can jump low fences and lose half his health. 

 

Beat that!

[Bayonet Hipshot]

How They Passed Time In Kaer Morhen

 

 

Yennefer:"Wait till it's in the air then use the crossbow"

 

Triss:"Use Igni when it's down,then Quen sign and slash with your sword."

 

Geralt:"Ladies! do you mind?"

 

Ciri:"Still not done with the prologue?! Really?"

 

Troll: *I wanna play too...*