Yes, they have more content than gay characters because straight men sometimes play as a lesbian as well. But I can't agree with you that lesbians are less targeted than gay men "in Bioware games". Juhani, the first "lesbian" character wasn't a titillation to straight men at all. I know, her romance was very shallow, but at least it was there. No romance for gay dudes however. The first bisexual woman I remember was Silk Fox from Jade Empire who had very unique lesbian dialogue. It wasn't a copy and paste job. she's certainly no further sexy female character for straight men. She was a strong woman, who discovered her bisexual side if you played as a female, and it was very well done. Besides that, she was much more story relevated than the bisexual male character, Sky. Same with Liara. She wasn't some hot Asari chick to romance. She was nerdy, cute and grew up stronger during the games. The lesbian romance with her might not vary very much from the heterosexual one, but she was clearly enjoyable if you romanced her as a female. And she was very story relevated as well. She had a bigger appearance in the game series than the bisexual male character, Kaidan. Also Leliana was done well. Okay, people always complained about Leliana having no romance banter if you romanced her as a female character. But I romanced both Zevran and Leliana with the same sex. And none of them seemed less developed or enjoyable than the other one. Next characters; Merrill and Isabela: People who complain about Isabela could also complain about Zevran. I don't see how it works. And there's no difference between Merrill and Fenris. Both of them seem to be very playersexual. I never played Baldurs Gate, so I can't say anything about that game. But the only lesbian character I saw that seemed to be like a titillation was Samantha. And even Samantha had more character flaws and sympathy from my side than the generic Steve.
by the way: I only talk about Bioware games. Most other games don't have gay characters at all, and lesbians primarily for the reaons you mentioned.
Of course, the fact that only ManShep (and automatically, by the extension FemShep who didn't romance her) got to really know her character, not FemShep who was in relationship with her (her players actually got much less content, mostly when it comes to important, character-building dialogues), strongly suggests that she was from the beginning created with straight men in mind, not lesbians. Steve may be "boring", but his sexuality as a gay man was always treated with full respect and he wasn't for straight yaoi fans' pleasure.
Fallout New Vegas had perks that allowed gay and lesbian, as well as straight male/straight female conversations with certain NPCs. And guess what, lesbians got significantly less such conversations than gay men, not to mention that their options usually just directed to conversation you could achieve anyway by passing some attribute test, while most gay male conversation options had special content.
It's really starting to remind situation of lesbians and gay men in other media, where gay men are treated as "the real deal", while all the others are pushed aside and ridiculed. According to GLAAD reports, there are more gay male characters in TV than the whole LBT combined. And their sexuality is generally treated with respect, while overwhelming majority of lesbian characters just have to have sex with men, and usually look like they enjoy it, reinforcing incredibly damaging homophobic myths about lesbian sexuality. Interestingly, many such storylines come from gay men as showrunners or headwriters. Few months ago, when "lesbian sleeping with a man" trope happened in "Hannibal", gay showrunner even used his sexuality to silence the criticism from lesbian audience.
I never played Fallout New Vegas, only BioWare games, so I can't say anything about that game. But I don't agree with you that gay sexuality is treated more respectfully than lesbian sexuality. On the contrary, lots of gay characters are represented as very ridiculous and overly feminine sex addicted jokes, whereas lesbian characters are often described more adequat or realistically. I agree though that in media, gay sexuality is more present than lesbian sexuality. But unfortunately, in a negative way very often.
Lesbian characters in TV are almost entirely femme. How is that more adequate and realistic? BTW, IIRC that was the argument of Bryan Fuller, showrunner of Hannibal, why he changed butch, body-building lesbian from the book into femme - to not reinforce negative stereotypes. And then he made her have sex with a man, which didn't have place in book. Of course, he had excuse - she just wanted to get pregnant. But for some reason, he also had to make her look like she was really into the sex.
And I would argue that the fact that overwhelming majority of lesbian characters sleep with men (like I said, usually looking like it's quite enjoyable experience for them; at least 6th TV show since the end of last year did it about month ago) is much worse, because aside of making our sexuality look like a joke, it reinforces the most damaging myths that fuel sexual hassassment and so called "corrective" rapes on lesbians.
I still think Sera won't be a titillation for straight men. She seems very smart and funny, and a little mouthy as well. I think she'll be a really great character and no comparison to Samantha. People shouldn't fear her treatment.
I won't agree to this, sorry. I saw lots of lesbian characters who were just as normal as other women (not described as butch or femme), whereas I saw lots of gay characters who were represented as pussys and wimps. There are far more gay people killed and abused than lesbians. Even justified by law in some countries. There are countries which punish lesbians and gays equally, but in more countries gay people have fewer rights when it comes to law. And even in areas where homosexuality is allowed, gays have a worse status than lesbians. And TV is at fault too, because gay characters are so badly and stereotypically represented. So I think gays are much worse treated than lesbians. But I think, we'll not find an agreement on this. So to each his own.
That there are more bisexual women than lesbians in TV is something I agree with, also that there are more gays than bisexual men.
I recall you saying that most players who did Leliana f/f romance were apparently straight men. Maybe that's why Traynor's content looked like it looked like. But I'm not so sure that straight men who do F/F romances are some stereotypical jocks. Those would rather never play as female on the first place.
I remember my surprise when seeing during some rant on Twitter due to yet another instance of "lesbian sleeping with a man" trope happening in yet another show, that quite a few apparently straight men (with accounts looking valid) were pissed off because of that situation and were calling out people who were responsible for their sexism and homophobia. And they pointed out at shows with positive lesbian representation, like OITNB.
So, straight men being fans of lesbian storylines and calling out for "lesbian sleeping with a man" trope. I wonder if it isn't rather such men who did that romance. So if devs try to appeal to them, then they need to appeal to us, lesbians, on the first place.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






