137 réponses à ce sujet

[Grieving Natashina]

This is mine:

 

Spoiler

[TheKomandorShepard]

Well i will go with chaotic evil of course i don't talk here about low-intelligent chaotic evil that burns and kills everything and everyone on their way just because more sarevok type chaotic evil.

 

Of course after seeing dialogue options im worried that we won't have much freedom like in da 2 where you could be chaotic neutral at worst when agressive. 

[Grieving Natashina]

Well i will go with chaotic evil of course i don't talk here about low-intelligent chaotic evil that burns and kills everything and everyone on their way just because more sarevok type chaotic evil.

 

Of course after seeing dialogue options im worried that we won't have much freedom like in da 2 where you could be chaotic neutral at worst when agressive. 

This was the image I used long ago to describe your alignment.  You seemed to like it.  

 

[Vapaa]

Elf nationalist

 

Yes, that's an alignement

[TheKomandorShepard]

This was the image I used long ago to describe your alignment.  You seemed to like it.  

 

Well while sentence fits me a little Jack is little too crazy for me.As i said i will have to see how much freedom game will give me in rp and if game allow me to play even as CE because second dragon age didn't.

[Blazingt1]

Natural Good for the first character. The next can wait.

[noxpanda]

chaotic neutral/chaotic good, depending on my mood for each quest   

 

If i had the option id spend the whole game in the tavern telling stupid jokes and singing really badly.

[Chibi Elemental]

I love playing the pragmatic lawful neutral type character that has a sarcastic streak probably going to play that with my Dwarf rogue inquisitor more a spy then a thief

[HellaciousHutch]

Chaotic Good or Lawful Neutral.

[Sir DeLoria]

Lawful Good, but not the reforming type.

See evil => kill it

[Vindicare175]

Honestly , my main/first Inquisitor is a mix of a few so its hard to nail down to a single alignment.

 

As the actions at times draw from more then 1 ,

 

Will help anyone who's in need generally , will outright butcher anyone who attacks them even if they are on there knee's begging for life , Betrayal is generally (depending on the reasoning) dealt with via execution same with Traitors. However the character is generally still very easy-going at times , enjoys a good time and will fight and kill to protect everyone he deems his Friends/Loved ones , Generally follows the laws however sometimes you need to break them to get the job done and they will do this willingly and knowingly , same with being a bit of a brute and using Intimidation & Threats to get the job done or information you need.

 

I'm always (or try to) be Neutral and do whatever i feel like / what I feel is the right choice. 

[Savvie]

I always seem to pick Chaotic good. Lawful is not my type of play but still like to be a good character with a bit of rebel mixed in.

[Feryx]

Even Rogue: CG

 

Qunari Mage: LE

 

Dwarven Warrior: LG

[Hobbes]

Somewhere with a mixture of Chaotic good and neutral good I suppose.  I'll do what I need to do to get things done and what I think is right.  Preferably through peaceful means, but if I think that won't work I won't be afraid to get a little dirty. 

[Tenebrae]

Well assuming my first run goes as planed (Vivienne as a romance option+her meeting my exceptions) this will be my first run:

 

[Hellion Rex]

Chaotic Good, since I always play self-inserts.

[KainD]

The D&D alignments are a lot broader than you describe OP. I myself am a Chaotic Evil person, and will try to roleplay one if possible, but it's not quite as you described it to be. 

 

Personally this is the best description of Chaotic Evil I have come across: 

 

Spoiler

Chaotic Evil people are all different, and that's the key to understanding them. Each of them is a world unto himself or herself. They are fiercely individualistic to the point of literally caring about nothing except themselves, and view other people as either their followers or their enemies. Everything revolves around the Self -- all else is illusion. Other people are generally just tools or playthings, to be used and/or discarded at will. Only the individual matters, and an individual's worth is determined by his or her own strength and merit. Weaker or less intelligent individuals are begging to be taken advantage of, because if someone cannot act of their own free will, they don't deserve free will to begin with. Which is why lesser people join groups and follow authority figures. Groups have rules, rules surpress personal choice, therefore groups are the enemy of the individual, with society being the largest group and therefore the ultimate enemy. Society must be avoided, manipulated, or attacked (as applicable). Arrogance, rebelliousness, paranoia, and hatred are the cornerstones of Chaotic Evil thought. The term "sociopath" comes to mind (except that this term has become so overused it has no real meaning anymore, but that's another matter). In a way, Chaotic Evil is the easiest alignment to be, since it's entirely selfish and self-centered. In another way it's the most difficult alignment to be ...

a universe of one is a horribly lonely place.  

...

Chaotic Evil is the most hated and misunderstood of all alignments. Because it is the polar opposite of Lawful Good or "the storybook hero alignment," Chaotic Evil has gotten the reputation for being everything that storybook heroes aren't : ugly, treacherous, scheming, cowardly, weak-willed, sadistic, depraved, and so on. In truth, Chaotic Evil is not (necessarily) any of these things. Each Chaotic Evil is different. One might be a backstabbing coward, another might fearlessly attack head-on. One might keep his word, another might break it. One might be a perverted molester, another might go out of his way to kill molesters, a third might not care either way. The point is, every Chaotic Evil does whatever he or she wants, regardless of how it affects anyone else (ironically, a Chaotic Evil's worst enemies are often other Chaotic Evils). A Chaotic Evil trusts no one, is moderately to extremely paranoid, and loves himself above all others. It's not impossible for a Chaotic Evil to love someone else, it's just very unusual. Still, sometimes it does happen. The two lovers inNatural Born Killers, the homicidal hillbillies of The Devil's Rejects, and the Tutman brothers from Blood Diner were all Chaotic Evil, yet they were fiercely loyal to their loved ones. If a Chaotic Evil loves you, REALLY loves you, they will defend you with a fury that even the bravest "hero" could never match ... if you are in their heart, then you're a part of their inner world, and their inner world is everythingto them. This is probably the only evil alignment actually capable of real love, because these people are strongly driven by their emotions and impulses. They love deeply. And hate even more deeply.  

... 

This is also the most unstable and self-destructive form of evil, the kind that would cut off its nose to spite its face. Other evil alignments will grovel and beg if they are defeated, degrading themselves in exchange for their lives. Chaotic Evil, in its sheer arrogance, usually just says "**** you!"  This is Prince Mordred, dragging himself up the spear and running himself through, literally killing himself just to get within range to smash King Arthur's skull in with his broadsword. More than anything else, Chaotic Evil is driven by pure SPITE. All things considered, it's hard not to admire them at least a little.    

[themikefest]

For my femquisitor

 

Spoiler

    

[Adaar the Unbound]

Definitely Chaotic Good except my Qunari Mage will also be very vengeful and enjoy seeing his enemies suffer sometimes.

[ElementalFury106]

Neutral Good.

[GameBoyish]

Chaotic Neutral first, Chaotic Evil second.

[ElementalFury106]

My canon Warden and Hawke were both Neutral Good. I try to make my first and main character(s) as much a representation of my own ideals/morals as possible, and Neutral Good is very fitting for me. In my career, a neutral attitude is the best approach, so it's all the more fitting for me. 

 

...Unless someone decides to show disrespect such as a racial slur/other insult...then I become chaotic evil. No f**ks given.

 

In my other playthroughs, my multiple Inquisitors will inhabit a bunch of these personalities. 

[Ina]

My characters don't fit perfectly into any one alignment, but tend to often be on the neutral-chaotic-good scale. I don't play evil characters and I rarely play blindly lawful characters.

 

I'd say my main canon warden is chaotic-neutral good, in that she tries to see all points of view instead of being blindly judgemental and wants to help those in need. My main canon Hawke is chaotic neutral-good, in that he primarily looks out for his own friends/family though I'd say he isn't altogether disliked as he's very charismatic. My main canon inquisitor will likely fit the previous archetypes as well, though I'm leaning more towards neutral good.

 

I guess I have a hard time playing characters who sway too far from my own self or at the least my idealized view of myself.

[trying_touch]

Oh, cool... so far, most of us want a little "chaos" in our alignments... 

[Icy Magebane]

I like the Lawful Evil Templar, or the True Neutral or Lawful Evil Mage.  With rogues I'm pretty much just True Neutral.