They all put the price like that, but it doesnt mean you are paying the same amount. 59 euros is 89 USD.
I have no idea why.
It was my fault for missing what you meant, not how you wrote it.
Lol so now I assume it's shipping cost or something like that
But like you I have no clue
Ps I'm Dutch sorry that I could not explain it so you did understand it the first time
But as you may have noticed by now I am not a native English speaker
I did not know how to explain it other wise
The reason is simple. Because they can. Btw. the version that costs 59 Euros here is the version up on origins, the physical version from amazon costs 50 Euros.
Yeah, the physical version is cheaper than the digital one, let that sink in.
So no it's most likely not due to shipping costs^^
Delayed? Alright, maybe they are trying to make females to look a bit prettier.
Spoiler
all my likes should go to this
Somehow I expected your answer wich basically sucks as people are screwed because of it for being in EuropeThe reason is simple. Because they can. Btw. the version that costs 59 Euros here is the version up on origins, the physical version from amazon costs 50 Euros.
Yeah, the physical version is cheaper than the digital one, let that sink in.
So no it's most likely not due to shipping costs^^
It was my fault for missing what you meant, not how you wrote it.
If the delay means ....More polish, a better game & less bugs.... Then that's awesome!
I don't understand some of the complaining on the forums? 
Somehow I expected your answer wich basically sucks as people are screwed because of it for being in Europe
Just like the English who pay even more for exactly the same game but thank you for the answer
Yeah i am one of those that get screwed.
IGN just loves to make me paranoid
I say it's a sign of good faith that they're serious about making this game the best Dragon Age they can possibly make, or at least they're serious about trying.
Ign opinion does not matter. This game has had a 3 year cycle its not going to be a buggy mess when it comes out like new vegas. Extra few weeks is just for a bit more polish.
Ign opinion does not matter. This game has had a 3 year cycle its not going to be a buggy mess when it comes out like new vegas. Extra few weeks is just for a bit more polish.
Lol, everyone has a right to an opinion, and Duke Nukem had 15 years in development
Somehow I expected your answer wich basically sucks as people are screwed because of it for being in Europe
Just like the English who pay even more for exactly the same game but thank you for the answer
Yep as a English customer i got butt raped £59($101) for DAI Digital Deluxe edition on Origin The irony is that just like the USA customers I can preload it on Nov 17th and yet for not one justifiable reason I have to wait till Nov 21st to play it even though its on my dam hard drive 4 days earlier.Whats odd is things like import taxes do not apply to digital content just he equivalent of V.A.T so where do they get the extra $42 that I am being charged?
-snip-
IGN just loves to make me paranoid
Why is there always one token woman who makes the introduction to videos like these and then pretty much stays silent for the duration of the clip? I love how she had absolutely nothing insightful to say for the entire segment. Gotta love IGN. It's got to be some marketing schtick. CATCH THE VIEWERS ATTENTION WITH A HOT BABE and then keep them wrangled with deep commentary from people who are actually interested in video games.
Gotta love IGN...
You're so right 
I guess they have some many lines and minutes of content to push out.
That said, their public comments threads are simply vile and toxic.
They make the BioWare forum look like a 'my little pony' discussion group.
Allan,
You and a few others have mentioned "sounds like some of you are saying that adding a delay will make the game worse?"... actually that can happen. There is a thing known as "over thinking" or "over working" and idea. I can give you multiple examples, let's say you and the team decide "yeah those facial remarks we are seeing on the forums and elsewhere, we should tweak the whole facial system before release" and then in the implementation it actually ends up worse to the majority of people using your product then not.
Point being you can always over think something, as a coder myself I do this within databases constantly and kick myself in the butt later for thinking to deep with something that could have been a simple fix in the first place. So it's actually a possibility that the some in your team might be doing the same thing trying to make the game "be the best it can be " in their own eyes in turn making it worse then it's current state. Rare but possible, how you find this shocking as a statement just seems very closed minded for a guy being in the industry as long as you have.
I'm really sad it got pushed back since it means a longer wait and the earlier release was much closer to my B-Day and hence would have been the PERFECT B-Day present to myself or from someone else if they asked what I wanted, hehe. But I also really respect that they are taking the time to get in order, there's been a surprisingly a lot of games released on the market lately that don't work correctly on release and for the peeps who don't have internet connects to "fix" games they already bought, damn... I feel sorry for them. A few new games of recent memory flat out couldn't run in their "new" condition like Defiance. I'd much rather have a game and it's features work on release then pay for the disk and still have to wait around for it get fixed.
I was thinking about it, and reading up on the delay for Battlefield: Hardline which was probably supposed to be EA's big hitter in November (Late October right before the New CoD technically), and I've come to a perhaps optimistic conclusion that maybe the delay from October wasn't done because the game was an unplayable wreck that needed the extra month, but because EA decided that with all the (Pretty bad) feedback from Hardline's Beta, which resulted in the much larger delay, EA needed a heavy-hitter in Novembe to fill the voidr. So in my eyes, the delay makes sense as both a way to take maybe a little pressure off BioWare in the release race, while also making the game poised to be EA's most successful (According to pre-order forcasting which is fairly reliable actually) title this year better in quality and giving it a better chance to sell. (As November is consistently the best month to release a game in)
Wishful thinking maybe? I think I just have a hard time reconciling the idea that if the game was unfit for release in October, an extra month would be the deciding factor, more likely a good release is being polished to an excellent release in my opinion. Though a pessimist may argue that a turd released in November will just sell more anyway based on my own post.
Guest_LOOOOOP_*
This is kind of annoying because it comes out the same day as Far Cry 4, before they would have been spread out much more. I might wait till christmas to play Far Cry 4 now, I dunno.
Lol, everyone has a right to an opinion, and Duke Nukem had 15 years in development
Yeah, but Duke Nukem Forever also went through development hell, switching graphical engines, developers, and having to be recoded pretty much entirely several times. We have no indication that this has happened to Inquisition, so you really can't compare the two games. At all.
Yeah, but Duke Nukem Forever also went through development hell, switching graphical engines, developers, and having to be recoded pretty much entirely several times. We have no indication that this has happened to Inquisition, so you really can't compare the two games. At all.
The comparison will continue to be made regardless of it's relevance to DAI.
Yeah, but Duke Nukem Forever also went through development hell, switching graphical engines, developers, and having to be recoded pretty much entirely several times. We have no indication that this has happened to Inquisition, so you really can't compare the two games. At all.
Ya whenever someone wants to use Duke Forever as a comparison you know they are just full of it. Daikatana is a closer fit but not by much.
Yeah, but Duke Nukem Forever also went through development hell, switching graphical engines, developers, and having to be recoded pretty much entirely several times. We have no indication that this has happened to Inquisition, so you really can't compare the two games. At all.
and these are all things that can happen in a 3 year development cycle. also the game was in development for 12 years before it had developer switches or financial troubles.
I disagree.
Retour en haut
