39 réponses à ce sujet

[laudable11]

Polishing up multiplayer I hope.

[DarkKnightHolmes]

If they delayed the game a whole month for romance, I'd be pissed.

[LadySatsuki]

Let's face it, it's most definitely likely pushed back for erasing bugs. Which I'm fine with, despite these tears streaming down my face. I'd rather have a late, clean game than an early, bugged game.

 

Although I wouldn't say no to long hair or just more content in the character creator.

 

As for romances . . . . I just have no idea who they could add at this point. Seriously, they have said there will be no DLC, you know they will not commit any more of the companions/advisors than they already have, who is left?

[Elite Midget]

Would be nice but what's nicer is polishing and bug hunting to ensure a smooth and fun launch.

[CrimsonN7]

Would be nice but what's nicer is polishing and bug hunting to ensure a smooth and fun launch.

 

Yup, I'm perfectly fine with waiting, what's another month, if the Bioware team need that extra time to clean up the game some more before release let em at it. A quality game experience that's what we want afterall.

[themageguy]

I care more about bugs than romances.
remember how in dragon age 2 fireball was bugged upon release?
did enough damage to tickle a nug. Tsk tsk

[A.Kazama]

5 weeks to make a whole new romance, gimme a break...

As for the delay I can live with this, but if they delay it til 2015 i will have a BF.

I feel like they're dangling a carrot in front of my face and just when I'm about to reach it... It's gone!

[simpatikool]

I am imagining they are getting the networking between EA and Sony/XBOX finalized for the awesome side of MP.

[Chron0id]

Why is everyone hoping for multiplayer?  For the love of Andraste, just...NO!

[EmperorSahlertz]

Why is everyone hoping for multiplayer?  For the love of Andraste, just...NO!

Because multiplayer is one of the few things that can keep a game alive well beyond its years.

[cjones91]

Because multiplayer is one of the few things that can keep a game alive well beyond its years.

And the reverse is also true,multiplayer can detract from a game especially if it was'nt needed.

 

DAI isn't the type of game that needs multiplayer in any shape or form since the single player content is more than enough for players to come back to.

[EmperorSahlertz]

And the reverse is also true,multiplayer can detract from a game especially if it was'nt needed.

 

DAI isn't the type of game that needs multiplayer in any shape or form since the single player content is more than enough for players to come back to.

I have yet to see anyone say they refused to play the singleplayer content of a game because they disliked the multiplayer content.. And if there are some, they certainly aren't a big enough demographic to even matter.

 

Multiplayer is (luckily for some) optional content. But content of such a character that it extends the longevity of the game. Just look at Mass Effect 3. I am certain that more play the multiplayer of that game today, than completes (or even just plays) the singleplayer.

[Ninjasplaycardgames2]

Have you ever polished a lamppost in winter?

[Ninjasplaycardgames2]

With the focus on strategic placement of your party members in DAI, I doubt any form of multiplayer would play well since you wouldn't be able to pause the game while you micromanage. DAI doesn't need multiplayer.