2 réponses à ce sujet

[Pierce Miller]

I saw people discussing this a little in another thread but I'd like to shine a light on it if possible. During the DAI demo we see the Inquisitor try to tell Leliana to let go of the Magister's son, she doesn't comply and proceeds to slit his throat. She defied direct orders, now I know we won't be able to execute her for this but some punishment must be possible? Otherwise we're impotent leaders and deserve no respect. An Inquisition needs a leader that rules with an iron fist.

[David Gaider]

I saw people discussing this a little in another thread but I'd like to shine a light on it if possible. During the DAI demo we see the Inquisitor try to tell Leliana to let go of the Magister's son, she doesn't comply and proceeds to slit his throat. She defied direct orders, now I know we won't be able to execute her for this but some punishment must be possible? Otherwise we're impotent leaders and deserve no respect. An Inquisition needs a leader that rules with an iron fist.

 

You could also wait and see whether the context actually applies. How do you know you lead anything at that point? How do you know Leliana serves you at that point? Be careful of your assumptions... particularly when it comes to a plot that you're only half-seeing, and during which we removed any portions of the dialogue that were too spoilery.

[David Gaider]

I don't care if anyone agrees with what Leilana did or if they like it when npcs do whatever they want. I just want the option to not be walked on in my so called rise to power.  If anyone agrees with what she did and feels no need to confront her then good for them. I just want the OPTION to do differently.

 

Tell you what.

 

If, once you play the game and play that particular story, you still feel that Leliana contravened your direct order and you did not get sufficient ability to take her to task afterwards for doing so, then return and say so. I am uncertain why one would assume that wouldn't be the case.