If they have MP then it should be option to install it when you install the SP game. I live for the SP part of the game and never have had a interest in MP period.
If I don't want to do the romances can I request to not install those?
Isn't that the same thing?
If I don't want to do the romances can I request to not install those?
Isn't that the same thing?
I'd be 100% fine with that.
god darn it. I don't effing want mp.
There's a more important issue than multiplayer.
Around 85% of players play good rather than renegade.
Given that so many people just play good, the resources that are allocated to developing and writing renegade choices could be reallocated so that we would have a much better single player game for the good players.
In fact, there's no need for me to install the renegade choices at all is there, as I won't need to use them.
If I don't want to do the romances can I request to not install those?
Isn't that the same thing?
How is the romances gonna be tied in MP? 
I simply don't like playing MP and never did when I played ME3. I prefer to have the option of not installing MP when installing the game and not installing it behind my back or without my knowledge on MP being installed.
There's a more important issue than multiplayer.
Around 85% of players play good rather than renegade.
Given that so many people just play good, the resources that are allocated to developing and writing renegade choices could be reallocated so that we would have a much better single player game for the good players.
In fact, there's no need for me to install the renegade choices at all is there, as I won't need to use them.
I know that this is all sarcasm, but you know what's sad? There are actually people who don't want Dragon Age to have the darker choices. Their reason is that it doesn't suit the game, and they'll probably even use what you said as another reason for the choices to not be there.
How is the romances gonna be tied in MP?
the point being there are a ton of game "features" people don't like: I hate Skyrim for pointless dull exploration and crafting. DAI promises both of those -- can I just opt out? Some people, and gasp if you will, think the romances are silly and badly written can they skip those? Combat in the DA series has been two different but equally wrong forms of bad. Combat optional? The answer is no to a large extent. No I don't have to explore just like no you don't have to play MP but there are consequences to that opting out for me, and maybe for you. Cope and deal.
the point being there are a ton of game "features" people don't like: I hate Skyrim for pointless dull exploration and crafting. DAI promises both of those -- can I just opt out? Some people, and gasp if you will, think the romances are silly and badly written can they skip those? Combat in the DA series has been two different but equally wrong forms of bad. Combat optional? The answer is no to a large extent. No I don't have to explore just like no you don't have to play MP but there are consequences to that opting out for me, and maybe for you. Cope and deal.
Then you install MP if they have a option of doing so but let other people decide if they want to even install it period. Romances will always be in the game and if a person doesn't want to romance then they should do so then.
I know that this is all sarcasm, but you know what's sad? There are actually people who don't want Dragon Age to have the darker choices. Their reason is that it doesn't suit the game, and they'll probably even use what you said as another reason for the choices to not be there.
Also sadly there are some who only want dark choices, death endings, dark life no hope.
I don't generally make those dark choices, but I have no problem with people who do, the more choices in the SP game the happier I am.
MP as long as it does nothing to the single player game, I don't really care. Though I can see where someone might not want their memory taken up with something they will never use and is not part of the main game's story, But I don't remember seeing the ME3 MP showing up on my 360 storage area or my pc.
If I don't want to do the romances can I request to not install those?
Isn't that the same thing?
Sure.
If you can't get the optimal ending without romancing someone
If there's a message on the main menu saying "WHY YOU NO ROMANCE?"
If not romancing someone throws off the game balance
If there is romance-specific DLC
Multiplayer:
Seriously though, if you don't want it, I respect that you don't want it.
It might not be your decision, it may be down to bandwidth and online access.
It may break immersion for you to be running around with 'ButtBreath6969' next to you.
I don't think you should have to do it and it should not affect your ability to experience the whole game untouched
There.
I don't think it is reasonable to expect single player and multiplayer game code which may use common assets and common files to have be separated on physical or digital media, that's not a reasonable expectation and to do it would be more complex and cost more.
We've addressed the funding issue, arguments or not, as there is much to support the idea that multiplayers are separately funded and where they happen they are planned in from the start.
If multiplayer is a lame derivative griefer-filled experience then I won't be playing it either.
But the prospect of multiplayer that complements the story and involves me playing - as part of the wider story - with others rather than just me or AI characters is very appealing.
I guess we will have to wait and see - we don't really know either way do we.
Or we could fill another 50 pages of 'I hate it' - 'I love it',,,
EDIT
I have seen a Romance DLC request thread by the way 
There's a more important issue than multiplayer.
Around 85% of players play good rather than renegade.
Given that so many people just play good, the resources that are allocated to developing and writing renegade choices could be reallocated so that we would have a much better single player game for the good players.
In fact, there's no need for me to install the renegade choices at all is there, as I won't need to use them.
They already did that with Autodialogue Shepard talking like a stupid paragon in ME3 so you're not far off.
I love ME 3 MP and if this is done right it could be really cool, I am more hyped for the game now.
So long as it isn't required to get access to all singleplayer content (and spin it how you want, for ME3 it did until that was fixed with the extended cut), the below video pretty much sums up my response. From someone who was heavily biased against its inclusion in ME3 but ended up enjoying casually playing it after initially only thinking I'd do enough to get my EMS up.
This one of the most BSN threads on BSN.
And step off if you don't think its still the BSN
Sure.
If you can't get the optimal ending without romancing someone
If there's a message on the main menu saying "WHY YOU NO ROMANCE?"
If not romancing someone throws off the game balance
If there is romance-specific DLC
1. So Morrigan, but have it patched later so that no one dies even without OGB.(seems unnecessary especially considering no one actually asked for that to be the case in ME3 MP)
2. Kind of random, don't think people would care.
3. Not sure what you're talking about here. ME3 MP doesn't affect combat balance or items in the SP.
4. So what I'm hearing you say, is you want microtransactions in your romances so that they can fund "free" dlcs for them. Not that I'm opposed to free dlc, but doubt people would like to choose between grinding a romance and paying extra to have a romance.
I'm not particularly fond of the idea of multiplayer in Dragon Age, mostly because I can't imagine how it would work. I did really enjoy ME3's multiplayer though, so I'm not entirely against the concept.
That said, I am somewhat skeptical of the validity of this, especially since the information comes from a dubious Russian website that lists a single obscure achievement.
Oh wow there's going to multiplayer, if its as fun as ME3 it's going to be awesome. So much longevity for me
The main reason i support multiplayer is it adds content to the game. I'm the type who can't keep just replaying these games over and over again despite different choices (except for going back to them a year or so later) so to have multiplayer would give me more to do and feel better about buying this game full price $60.
It has to be done right though. It may just be me but i'd love a "Battlefront" style multiplayer like seen in that game Lord of the Rings: Conquest if anyone remembers it.
Really don't understand the logic of those that demand multiplayer to be utterly separate and the option not to install it with SP. MP isn't some plague rat that will infect your SP experience simply by being part of the package. Point to ME3 all you want, it was a design the very same devs removed after the fact. You can simply ignore the option to play MP without forcing Bioware to go to all the unneeded effort to separate experiences that likely use many of the same assets and animations.
Really don't understand the logic of those that demand multiplayer to be utterly separate and the option not to install it with SP. MP isn't some plague rat that will infect your SP experience simply by being part of the package. Point to ME3 all you want, it was a design the very same devs removed after the fact. You can simply ignore the option to play MP without forcing Bioware to go to all the unneeded effort to separate experiences that likely use many of the same assets and animations.
Goes back to how me3 was before the cut came out.
Goes back to how me3 was before the cut came out.
Exactly, and Bioware responded to the outrage by removing it so I don't understand it at all.
They can be installed together and have no bearing on one another. Separating them just creates a whole lot of unnecessary work for Bioware.
Retour en haut
