Aller au contenu

Photo

Did you want the Reapers to have a "noble" purpose?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
229 réponses à ce sujet

#201
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

Why would it be a werehouse? If its a virtual existence, I damn sure hope they have fun with it.

 

I don't think a Reaper is a simulated society like the Virtual Alien. I think they're individuals with gestalt minds, like Legion, whom you'll note also once called himself "a nation."

 

 

I've been thinking lately about the how the reapers harvest a civilization's genetic material, and the collected wisdom and memories of that civilization are retained within the reaper. What is the purpose in retaining any of it? What do they do with it?

 

In Leviathan DLC, it is stated that the Catalyst is still searching for the solution to its task. What the Catalyst appears to be looking for is to bring the galaxy to an "equilibrium" state between organics and synthetics. In reaching that end, I think the Catalyst's plan would be to release the Reapers from its control and allow them to function autonomously. In doing so, the Catalyst will have not only completed its task, but also will have kept the memories of the harvested civilizations preserved and functioning as free life forms in their own rights.

 

Before the ending, though, the Catalyst is kinda stuck because he has to use the preserved civilizations as servants for his harvests.



#202
JasonShepard

JasonShepard
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages

SNIP

 
*sigh*

 

I REALLY wish people would stop using that. It's an unnecessary exercise in oversimplification.

 

The Catalyst doesn't view harvesting and killing as the same thing.



#203
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 731 messages
I usually take that as a sign that whoever posts it doesn't have an argument.

#204
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 288 messages

 

 
 
*sigh*

 

I REALLY wish people would stop using that. It's an unnecessary exercise in oversimplification.

 

The Catalyst doesn't view harvesting and killing as the same thing.

 

Which makes it an idiot



#205
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 288 messages

But... 50,000 years or 3 billion years.... what do I care? I'll be dead. At least with High EMS destroy I get to see Liara again.

Because at 3100 EMS, Shepard's has access to a convenient refrigerator to hide in  :lol:



#206
JasonShepard

JasonShepard
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages

Which makes it an idiot

 

It gives it a truly alien perspective. I like that. Even if I (obviously) don't agree with it.



#207
Hello!I'mTheDoctor

Hello!I'mTheDoctor
  • Banned
  • 825 messages

Which makes it an idiot

 

That's not idiocy, that's a difference of opinion.

 

Or is everything that's not up to your moral standard an idiot?



#208
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

Because at 3100 EMS, Shepard's has access to a convenient refrigerator to hide in  :lol:

 

Shepard's brain survived the vacuum of space and atmospheric entry into a corrosive atmosphere. Liara found Shepard and made sure (s)he was rebuilt. Shepard doesn't need a convenient refrigerator. Shepard has Liara. :P



#209
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 631 messages

Or is everything that's not up to your moral standard an idiot?


Why not? I say that sort of thing all the time myself.

#210
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 288 messages

It gives it a truly alien perspective. I like that. Even if I (obviously) don't agree with it.

 

No it's a declarative statement with nothing backing it up.  Particularly foolish in that it compares a supposedly superior AI to a mindless natural force. 



#211
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 288 messages

Shepard's brain survived the vacuum of space and atmospheric entry into a corrosive atmosphere. Liara found Shepard and made sure (s)he was rebuilt. Shepard doesn't need a convenient refrigerator. Shepard has Liara. :P

 

A few billion credits  thrown in for medical expenses wouldn't hurt  :P



#212
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

A few billion credits  thrown in for medical expenses wouldn't hurt  :P

 

When it comes to Shepard, Liara will find a way.



#213
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 731 messages

Such as?
...

See quotes for the response. I'm not interested in reposting. I just think I said enough the first time to let most of that conversation stand.

I'll add a couple of things:

- the Catalyst is not saying that every Synthetic victory will result in the complete destruction of all Organic life, but that Synthetics will eventually do it, probably due to the recurring conflict.

- the Catalyst's description of Synthetic rebellions is given in very general inclusive non-specific terms to represent emergent patterns of behavior, not specific circumstances or instances. The Synthetic rebellions that we know of quite easily fit into this description. To me, you have to actively not want the story to make sense to interpret the Synthetic rebellions that we know of (Metacon Wars, Zha'til, Geth, Synthetic Organic conflicts before the first Reaper War) as not part of the Synthetic rebellions that the Catalyst describes. To me these instances are quite obviously part of the pattern, the repeating pattern that the Vendetta VI described.
 

...
That the Leviathans were once a great civilization that ruled the galaxy for eons, does not preclude them from blundering or falling victim to complacency or hubris. We only need to look at our own history...

That is interesting, but was not the argument. You described Leviathan and the Catalyst in incompetent and pejorative terms (because of their admitted failures) to bolster a depiction of "fallible" and "flawed" beings incapable of making an accurate prediction of the inevitable Synthetic Organic conflict and destruction of all Organics by Synthetics.

I'm simply pointing out that your description is missing a big part of what these being are, and what they have done. Leviathan's and the Catalyst's control of the galaxy demonstrates considerable competence. Arguments of "flawed" and "fallible" beings are far less compelling when that is taken into account.
 

...
The Catalyst was not your standard A.I. like EDI or the Geth. It wasn't designed to handle the cyber warfare suite of a single star ship or to serve as manual labor, it was designed to manage the Leviathan's empire. It was something more akin to Skynet from the Terminator series. It was able to bring down the mighty Leviathan Empire because it already had control over many of the functions necessary for that civilization to function.
...

That's an interesting interpretation.

I do not subscribe to that version of the fall of Leviathan from the information we were given, since it assumes a level of ineptitude not befitting beings that were rulers of the galaxy.

My interpretation is that Leviathan created a more segregated intelligence that was capable of communicating and studying, and that this intelligence exceeded the bounds placed on it unbeknownst to its creators. I have that interpretation simply because that is the logical way an intelligence would be created to solve a problem in a society wary of the dangers of AI. Certainly the Catalyst was given (too wide) a degree of latitude to operate in, but I would assume that was far more restricted than what you are describing.

Since the mega structure that the Geth were building seems eerily similar to a Reaper, I would not assume that the Reaper's capabilities are singular and unique in AI. They are a demonstration of the power that AI unbridled by the constraints of organic evolution can marshal.

#214
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 807 messages

That's what I meant. 50,000 years is nothing. So just because the 10,000-years-later-epilogue is peaceful, a catastrophic synthetic rebellion could happen 3 billion years later.

 

Unless you measure your life on a geologic scale, 50,000 years is still quite a long time.

 

I can't imagine any good reason to give a space hamster's testicles about any event that may happen 3 billion years into the future, let alone 10,000. The amount of things that could happen within that time frame are immeasurable. Numerous species, including our own, could very well go extinct in any number of ways. Galactic civilization could collapse because of any number of reasons as new species introduce themselves, or spread disease on some rinkydink colony world, or offend some militant lizard people at a fancy mixer because of their funny accent or they have to lick their eyes to blink, causing a cataclysmic galactic war.

 

If the synthetic rebellion were to happen 3 billion years from now, I hope the robotic overlords enjoy the billion years they have left until the galaxy collides with Andromeda. But for us mere mortals, such a far off future is really very meaningless.


  • sH0tgUn jUliA aime ceci

#215
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 372 messages

This scene bugs me because the paraphrase of the lower option suggests a harsher tone, but they're exactly the same. It's tantamount to autodialogue activated through a dialogue prompt, like ME1.

 

You're defining yourself and your Shepard with it, that's all.



#216
angol fear

angol fear
  • Members
  • 828 messages

I'd argue that you're missing my point:

There are any number of reasons why the Reapers might want to make more of themselves, and I don't need to know why.

 

Harvesting entire species and turning them into new Reapers is reproduction. The Reapers are reproducing. Why are they reproducing? Who cares? The traditional organic motive of passing on your genes before you die clearly isn't their motive, but that doesn't mean they don't have some other motive.

 

Off the top of my head I can think of half a dozen reasons why they might want to make more of themselves. Maybe they're expecting an invasion from Andromeda. Maybe they're worried about the eventual heat death of the universe, and want as many minds as possible to think about a solution. Maybe it's just what they were originally programmed with, and they're just stuck in a code loop.

 

The point is that by not telling us why the Reapers did what they did, the writers would have preserved a sense of mystery regarding the Reapers. 'They're using us to reproduce' drops a nice, coy (and somewhat horrific) hint, but it still leaves us asking 'Why?'. ME3's ending... kinda did ruin the mystery. "Glorified Galactic Gardeners" just doesn't quite have the same impact.

 

For the same reason, I hope Star Trek never gives us an official origin of the Borg.

I've understood that a new reaper is reproduction but that's not what I've said.

Anyway, you didn't want a motivation for the reapers because this would create mystery. Actually, this would be very basic because we would be in a story with "evil" reapers. They never wanted to have such a manichaean story. Otherwise why would they try to make the reapers something complex and ambiguous. You don't like the explanation but the writing was supposed to create an explanation. From Mass Effect 1 to 3, the things get more and more complex. No motivation would be a huge step back in the structure and evolution of the story because Mass Effect 2 start to make the reapers more complex and then we would have a simplification of everything.

 

Edit : I will just add that if you really think that no explanation except they kill us is enough to create mystery, then is there any mystery in Terminator? I really don't like this word "mystery" because it doesn't mean something clear. You can say that reapers were like Cthulhu but it doesn't work : the context isn't the same and what people say about the mystery is actually fascination created by the narrator in lovecraft's book. The problem is that in Mass Effect there isn't such a thing so that fascination only work because they were in expectation of something. No narrator to create that fascination in Mass Effect, it was only a player's fantasy. (I know this will be misinterpreted, I think the reapers are as fascinating in Mass Effect 3 as they were before, their origin and their motivation don't change anything, they get more interesting in Mass Effect 3 than in Mass Effect 1 and 2)

 

So Maybe you didn't need to know why but the writing needed that point because it was stated from the beginning that they would explain it in the end.



#217
SporkFu

SporkFu
  • Members
  • 6 921 messages


In Leviathan DLC, it is stated that the Catalyst is still searching for the solution to its task. What the Catalyst appears to be looking for is to bring the galaxy to an "equilibrium" state between organics and synthetics. In reaching that end, I think the Catalyst's plan would be to release the Reapers from its control and allow them to function autonomously. In doing so, the Catalyst will have not only completed its task, but also will have kept the memories of the harvested civilizations preserved and functioning as free life forms in their own rights.

 

Before the ending, though, the Catalyst is kinda stuck because he has to use the preserved civilizations as servants for his harvests.

That's a fair point as well. Perhaps the reapers -- I don't want to say 'individuality' but something similar -- can't be actualized until the catalyst find its solution, and its mind ideally that would be synthesis. Hmmm... points to ponder. 



#218
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 594 messages

It gives it a truly alien perspective. I like that. Even if I (obviously) don't agree with it.

When it comes to basic facts it's just silly spin. People mulched by the Reapers are dead. It's not an alien perspective to say they're not killed but something else, it's plain wrong.
  • Iakus et sH0tgUn jUliA aiment ceci

#219
N172

N172
  • Members
  • 944 messages

The Catalyst doesn't view harvesting and killing as the same thing.

 

In fact, it views killing as part of the harvest/ascention:

"Just as we left your people alive the last time we're here."

"The reapers are a synthetic representation of my creators."

When it explaines CONTROL it says "You'll die!".



#220
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 731 messages
@N172
Right, so you agree with Jason then. Good.

#221
N172

N172
  • Members
  • 944 messages

No, as it was said killing is part of the process, not a different thing.

The catalyst is a fundamentalist attacking everything that threatens the Leviathan-order he believes in and synthesis is what he believes to be paradise.



#222
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 731 messages
@N172
So you're agreeing again. Killing is not harvesting. Good.

#223
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 807 messages

You're defining yourself and your Shepard with it, that's all.

 

Defining how, though? There's no defining moment here. Shepard is basically saying the same thing. Since Shepard automatically responds to the sound, the dialogue may as well have been automatic too.

 

 

@N172
So you're agreeing again. Killing is not harvesting. Good.

 

The only difference between simply killing something and harvesting is that the end result of one makes use of the remains of that which was killed. Whether it be crops, livestock or genetic material from a percentage of a species, whatever specimen each individual used to be before the harvest is dead as a door nail. Lilith died in the Collector base. Even if her memories were captured during the process, she is still dead. However the Catalyst may view this kind of thing doesn't matter, just like it doesn't matter if Legion can't appreciate the difference between the Normandy and the people aboard it.



#224
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 631 messages

When it comes to basic facts it's just silly spin. People mulched by the Reapers are dead. It's not an alien perspective to say they're not killed but something else, it's plain wrong.


However, an alien perspective might be that life or death isn't really all that important, as long as the information isn't lost.

#225
TMA LIVE

TMA LIVE
  • Members
  • 7 015 messages

I think it would have been better overall for everyone if whatever purpose they had was never given. Mainly because, with lines like "You'd never comprehend it" being told to you, you'd never live up to it.

 

I'd rather Shepard told the Reapers "I don't care what reasons you have. What you're doing is wrong."


  • Iakus et sH0tgUn jUliA aiment ceci