And we also have egaltarian strains of the dogma in which everyone is equal in comparison to the Maker, and that the Maker embraces all.
That’s true, but the point is that this concept is rarely reflected in reality, partially because of the Chantry's influence. For example, we know that at least in Denerim, out of all the Chantry priests, only one was willing to perform a wedding ceremony for the elves, or even to approach the alienage at all. This is telling, given that Fereldan has been stated to treat its elven citizens better than other nations do.
The Chantry states that the Maker embraces only those who believe in him- twice he has abandoned his people to their fate for believing in anything else. One of their core beliefs is as follows:
"Humankind has sinned and must seek penance to earn the Maker's forgiveness. When all people unite to praise the Maker, He will return to the world and make it a paradise."
Considering this, at least the Dalish elves would not be embraced by the Maker. This principle also encourages hostility towards not just the Dalish, but anyone whose beliefs differ from the norm because it states, albeit indirectly, that those people are preventing the world from becoming a paradise. This makes it easier to scapegoat these people for the world's problems (famines, bloodshed, plagues, etc.).
I consider inherency arguments about political positions non-starters because they are overwhelmingly fallacy-laden subjective arguments that reflect the arguer's preferences far more than the subject matter.
I'm no more interested arguing against your inherency arguments than I am in arguing against your favorite color. As a preference, I have no quarrel. As an objective statement, it wouldn't do any good and would be a waste of time and energy and interest.
All arguments are subjective. They draw from objective facts to reach subjective conclusions. That doesn't mean they aren't valuable or worth sharing.
Not really, but to be fair you'd need a thesis longer than this thread and you'd still be wrong about critical points here and there- like the control of the education system. The Chantry is the most prevalent center of knowledge in Thedas, but it isn't the only one and it doesn't dictate what others may or may not teach. It is not a monopoly that could accurately be described as controlling the education system, not least because there isn't an education system to be controlled and the Chantry's influence comes by default, and it doesn't exercise thought-police controls on permissable thought across Thedas.
Just because there are other centers of knowledge doesn’t mean that the Chantry doesn’t control the education system, which isn’t limited to formal methods of education (word of mouth, for example). The Chantry is also a system of education in and of itself, and the most prevalent one. The Chantry provides instruction to the powerful elite, including its own members, some of whom go on to become grand clerics and Divines. A religious education was given to King Cailan, as well as the Human Noble , who can go on to become the Warden-Commander of Amaranthine, Arl/essa of Amaranthine, Arl/essa of Denerim, Teyrn/a of Gwaren, and/or Prince/ss-Consort of Fereldan.
At least in Fereldan, mage apprentices were initially taught by a Chantry priest, and the Warden is no exception. The Chantry also schools their templars. As Alistair says, “I was educated by the Chantry. I studied history. They don’t make stupid templars.”
Commoners are also taught by the Chantry. During Summerday, one of the major religions practiced by nearly all Thedosians, “[b]oys and girls ready to come of age don white tunics and gowns. They then join a grand procession that crosses the settlement to the local Chantry, where they are taught the responsibilities of adulthood”.
The Chantry also has its own archivists and scholars. Brother Genitivi has written a number of the codex entries (I believe he’s written more of them than any one person has). In his own words, “If I can be honest, the long reign of the Chantry has made the recording of reality a challenge. Most histories have been written through the filter of my religion. Everything has meaning as it pertains to the Maker. And while this is unavoidable, it sometimes leads to conflicts between what is taught by the Chantry and what I have seen with my own eyes”.
The fact that the Chantry was able to all but erase Shartan’s memory from history by suppressing his writings and removing him from the Chant supports his statement. Whoever has the most control over the availability of information and the lines of communication to the public controls the education system, and the Chantry does exactly that. A significant part of the reason why the Chantry's supreme power is the default is because they educate nearly everyone in Thedas according to their values, often from childhood, and not necessarily through direct means.
*snip*
You, on the other hand, definitely don't seem to be having fun- if anything you seem defensive and hostile. And you aren't really countering an argument directly, and instead dwelt a good deal of time and thought on a subject you clearly dislike. So... that's nice? Maybe you enjoy the aggravation in some way? Some people live off of stress- I know I do. But usually not the sort that leaves me coming off as unhappy.
But… I am having fun. I enjoy discussing this with you and I wasn't trying to force you to change your opinion. Part of the fun of this forum is reading different points of view, at least for me. I've also read over my post and I didn't think it sounded hostile or defensive either. Maybe confusing those two with passion? I thought I was being respectful and reasonable. Did I offend you? I’m really sorry if I did but I don’t know how. And I thought I countered your argument - I never dismissed any part of it as meaningless. I've only said that I disagreed, I've given my reasons, and I've supported them with examples. You should also know I haven’t been just directly replying to the points you brought up- I've also been sharing my opinion for others on the forum to expand on or bring new perspectives to if they’d like. At least that was my intention. Anyway, whatever I did, I want to you know that I value your opinion and everyone else’s too.
I’m kind of worried that I've been offending everyone now… have I? Someone please tell me if I have.