I just hope it's a new world same races and mass relays but no mention of ME3's awful endings or Plot holes or Reapers and just a new PC characters just a nice clean slate.
If Bioware is smart make the new game act like ME3 never happened
#3
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:01
- chris2365 et Zatche aiment ceci
#5
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:13
No..Just no...
#6
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:16
Doesn't matter if people didn't like ME3 Bioware aren't ignoring it anytime soon.More the hammer that broke the lore.
#9
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:57
well of course i hope we hear something about the ending just from another point of view
because the truth is mass effect 3 did happen the ending did happen
so of course i wouldent want them to ignore it completely.
- Drone223 aime ceci
#10
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 04:00
I just hope it's a new world same races and mass relays but no mention of ME3's awful endings or Plot holes or Reapers and just a new PC characters just a nice clean slate.
they are not going to ignore the game just because some haters hate it.
- riverbanks et Rainbowhawk aiment ceci
#11
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 05:13
#12
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 05:41
starting with "if Bioware is smart"
and continuing with one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, considering that ME3 was hardly the starting point of the Reapers.
But, ME3 is the BEST place to start!
- Dubozz et chris2365 aiment ceci
#13
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 05:49
But, ME3 is the BEST place to start!
leave sarcasm & humor to those who can pull it off. you never were one of "those".
#14
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 09:08
No. Canonize a post-ME3 world state and move on into the future with a new story.
This sounds like the best idea to me. However much you might hate the ending(and I realize I'm probably in minority who's actually fine with them, post EC at least), whichever one Shepard chose represents a major change of status quo and the world and universe at large will change significantly because of it. I can see the next game going utopia or dystopia way, no matter if Destroy, Control or Synthesis was picked. To just ignore it would be the worst possible idea, since the options to evolve from admittedly and objectively bad ending and make something good of it are there and it would be shame to ignore them.
So no, I sincerely hope Bioware won't be "smart".
- phantomrachie, Rainbowhawk et ZipZap2000 aiment ceci
#15
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 09:15
More the hammer that broke the lore.
You're confusing ME2 with ME3.
ME2 took less than 30 minutes to break a bunch of the established lore, while in the process turning Shepard into Space Mecha Jesus, the Ressurected version, by the power of Space Magic.
- Samahl na Revas, Sailears, AlanC9 et 8 autres aiment ceci
#17
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:15
More the hammer that broke the lore.
I guess whatever you don't like breaks the lore.
The lore broke from ME2. If bioware is smart, they shouldn't include that too.
Basically ME4 is a ME sequel confirmed.
- Sailears et SolNebula aiment ceci
#18
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:42
I guess whatever you don't like breaks the lore.
Funny how people can dislike something and decide to pretend it doesn't exist.
#19
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 03:50
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
While I certainly hope so, It won't happen. Michael Gamble and Mac Walters are still in charge, So....
But I liked ME3. I've yet to be convinced it's a bad Mass Effect game, despite the dozens of essays I've read on the matter.
Well, The game did have some flaws, But the fanbase mostly didn't get what went wrong with the game.
#20
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 04:32
But I doubt it will happen, and Mac Walters will simply write the next "masterpiece" for the bargain bin.
- Iakus aime ceci
#21
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 04:38
Guest_AugmentedAssassin_*
That if it's set after ME3. many rumors suggest that It'll be set during the ME trilogy, But in a different place.
#23
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 05:01
I would welcome this. Let's just forget 2 and 3 ever happened.
Rather easily done, to be had: leave the Reapers in limbo after ME1, with their one method tested and proven through eons to work foiled, rather than have them fast-forward move into the galaxy in a couple years.
- CptFalconPunch et SolNebula aiment ceci
#24
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 05:19
Rather easily done, to be had: leave the Reapers in limbo after ME1, with their one method tested and proven through eons to work foiled, rather than have them fast-forward move into the galaxy in a couple years.
Oh boy so much this!!! Reapers permanently blocked in deep space after ME1, new things to do and new enemy to face.
#25
Posté 27 juillet 2014 - 06:25
This is pretty much what I expect them to do, act like the trilogy never happened or at least mention it as little as possible. As for the ME3 ending, anything can be written out and made pointless. Remember the Collector base?
It turned out not to be that big a deal. Whether by design or coincidence BW has always had this uncanny ability to over correct. People didn't like the mako, they took out exploration. People didn't like the elevators, they didn't make them better, they took them out. People complained about the inventory system in ME1, they took it out for ME2. With the backlash to the ME3 ending I doubt it will even come up in the next game, but we'll see.
- Tonymac, N7 Spectre525 et Moghedia aiment ceci





Retour en haut







