Aller au contenu

Photo

How Evil can we be?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
125 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

True enough.

 

KOTOR 1 particularly irked me back in the day.  I am a Sith Lord, seeking Galactic domination and the ruin of the Jedi....hey, I'm going to stop here and steal from this widow and laugh.  Laugh!  Mwa Ha Ha.  How evil I am for petty theft.  THIS IS HOW YOU CONQUER!

 

The flip side isn't really any better, though.

Yeah, but you get all the evil opportunities you want in DA, with siding with the templars and all.



#77
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 927 messages

Why does it seem like there are so many psychopaths and sociopaths on these forums? Like, I get that it's an RPG and we should have the option to be evil and whatnot, but... holy ****!

You're hanging out in the forum of a company that let's people do all of that...scared yet? lol!



#78
Hellion Rex

Hellion Rex
  • Members
  • 30 037 messages

True enough.

KOTOR 1 particularly irked me back in the day. I am a Sith Lord, seeking Galactic domination and the ruin of the Jedi....hey, I'm going to stop here and steal from this widow and laugh. Laugh! Mwa Ha Ha. How evil I am for petty theft. THIS IS HOW YOU CONQUER!

The flip side isn't really any better, though.

I thought it was awesome when we could curse that one guy and make him unable to speak ever again.

#79
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 927 messages

You know, you can play the game without killing civilians.

 

Most missions have you killing bad guys.

 

On topic, not TOO evil.

 

This is still the Inquisition and you're tagging along with the 2 hands of the Divine. You shouldn't be allowed to go all trigger happy like in DAO or DA2 and put that murder knife to use.

Sure, you just kill a  boat load of cops in the opening and any time you commit a crime and have to get away.



#80
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 927 messages

Yeah, but you get all the evil opportunities you want in DA, with siding with the templars and all.

That's not evil.



#81
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

That's not evil.

And that's why so many evil options are blatant; make them at all subtle and you get people claiming they're morally right.


  • Kalamah aime ceci

#82
simpatikool

simpatikool
  • Members
  • 705 messages
You can be naughty, but not nefarious. I hope that is clear.

#83
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages

And that's why so many evil options are blatant; make them at all subtle and you get people claiming they're morally right.

 

Remember kids; anything that isn't fanatical support for elves, mages, elven mages, and mage elves is evil, racist, evily racist, and just plain mean!

 

So sayeth the great prophet of all things just and right, Xil!!!!!!!!!!

 

Of course Xil's own list of supported attrocities and mental gymnastics boggles the mind.


  • Hazegurl aime ceci

#84
Pierce Miller

Pierce Miller
  • Members
  • 1 026 messages

Remember kids; anything that isn't fanatical support for elves, mages, elven mages, and mage elves is evil, racist, evily racist, and just plain mean!

 

So sayeth the great prophet of all things just and right, Xil!!!!!!!!!!

 

Of course Xil's own list of supported attrocities and mental gymnastics boggles the mind.

I don't like justifying my fanatical support for the mages, it's far funnier then :P



#85
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 932 messages

So how bad can we be in DAI? Burn down orphanages with children still inside? Backstab allies out of pure spite? Butcher villages just because we can? Extort the helpless for our own selfish needs? Leave our companions/advisors to a cruel and undeserved fate? Outright join the demon invasion and let the world burn?


Not washing our hands after using the urinal is the kind of evil i'm expecting from the Inquisitor.

#86
fhs33721

fhs33721
  • Members
  • 1 252 messages

Not washing our hands after using the urinal is the kind of evil i'm expecting from the Inquisitor.

More like selling people to demons for personal gain, commiting unnecessary acts of murder and ocasionally slaughtering Dalish clans. DA has always had some outright despicable choices you could take. Why are you expecting any less from Inquisition?



#87
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages
I find that BioWare games tend to have "the evil option." Siding with Branka, siding with the Templars, and siding with the werewolves are all examples of options that are presented as immoral, or less moral than the alternative.

Generally speaking, in DAO, if Morrigan approves then it's something bad. If Alistiar or Leliana approves, it's something good.

A player doesn't have to agree with the way BioWare frames issues, but it's still good to acknowledge that this is how the choices are presented. Extra Credits actually has a video criticizing said presentation in ME.
  • Zjarcal et CrimsonN7 aiment ceci

#88
Guest_john_sheparrd_*

Guest_john_sheparrd_*
  • Guests

Why does it seem like there are so many psychopaths and sociopaths on these forums? Like, I get that it's an RPG and we should have the option to be evil and whatnot, but... holy ****!

 

I agree this is really strange I mean people really want to play freaking homicidal maniacs and hell even commit genocide if

the option would be given

Sure its a video game and I also like to play someone who doesn't take **** from anyone and is a very strict military leader BUT thats very different from the crazy things people want from this game



#89
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 491 messages

I agree this is really strange I mean people really want to play freaking homicidal maniacs and hell even commit genocide if

the option would be given

Sure its a video game and I also like to play someone who doesn't take **** from anyone and is a very strict military leader BUT thats very different from the crazy things people want from this game

Why not? That is how peoples work if they didn't series like Gta wouldn't be so popular in fact games that have violence in it are far more popular than those that don't.Now you complain that peoples want commit genocide but notice that you already kill in this game and do something that wouldn't be seen nice in modern society.Does that mean if you kill virtual peoples that you are serial killer?



#90
Pierce Miller

Pierce Miller
  • Members
  • 1 026 messages
john_sheparrd, on 29 Jul 2014 - 12:16 AM, said:

I agree this is really strange I mean people really want to play freaking homicidal maniacs and hell even commit genocide if

the option would be given

Sure its a video game and I also like to play someone who doesn't take **** from anyone and is a very strict military leader BUT thats very different from the crazy things people want from this game

I'll never get to do those crazy things in real life, a virtual representation gives me the opportunity to act out dark scenarios. I just find it interesting.


  • Tevinter Rose aime ceci

#91
Icy Magebane

Icy Magebane
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages

I agree this is really strange I mean people really want to play freaking homicidal maniacs and hell even commit genocide if

the option would be given

Sure its a video game and I also like to play someone who doesn't take **** from anyone and is a very strict military leader BUT thats very different from the crazy things people want from this game

What I find even stranger is that they expect large numbers of soldiers to simply stand by while they do it.  I don't care if people want to do things like this or not, but it makes no sense to ignore all logic and realism in favor of a sadistic power fantasy.  At least some of the companions would revolt, all of the advisors would revolt, you'd lose all official support from both the Chantry and secular governments, and no less than half your soldiers would outright refuse to follow your commands... so how does any of this seem like a good idea?

 

This kind of stuff is really only suited to games where you are an individual or part of a very small group of dedicated, like-minded people... to expect the world to just sit back and watch, or for soldiers to even follow commands that wind up causing more damage than the demons is unreasonable.

 

This isn't a question of morality to me.  I don't mind unethical behavior in a game, so long as the game responds realistically.  We've had a lot of good, small-scale opportunities to commit evil acts in the past...  anything beyond that is asking for way too much.


  • Zjarcal et CrimsonN7 aiment ceci

#92
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 491 messages

What I find even stranger is that they expect large numbers of soldiers to simply stand by while they do it.  I don't care if people want to do things like this or not, but it makes no sense to ignore all logic and realism in favor of a sadistic power fantasy.  At least some of the companions would revolt, all of the advisors would revolt, you'd lose all official support from both the Chantry and secular governments, and no less than half your soldiers would outright refuse to follow your commands... so how does any of this seem like a good idea?

 

This kind of stuff is really only suited to games where you are an individual or part of a very small group of dedicated, like-minded people... to expect the world to just sit back and watch, or for soldiers to even follow commands that wind up causing more damage than the demons is unreasonable.

 

This isn't a question of morality to me.  I don't mind unethical behavior in a game, so long as the game responds realistically.  We've had a lot of good, small-scale opportunities to commit evil acts in the past... the OP is asking for way too much.

Do i have to tell you what Howe was doing?

Or orlesians in ferelden?

 

Besides it was said you don't have to support chantry or at least devs said you don't have to.



#93
Icy Magebane

Icy Magebane
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages

Do i have to tell you what Howe was doing?

Or orlesians in ferelden?

 

Besides it was said you don't have to support chantry or at least devs said you don't have to.

Howe's family has had power for generations and the Orlesians weren't doing anything out of the ordinary when they occupied Ferelden.  The Inquisition is a new (or at least, reborn) organization with no power of its own...  it wouldn't be easy for them to establish themselves if they become known for sadism and barbaric acts.

 

Maybe the Chantry wasn't a good example... I mean established groups that hold power in Thedas... the Inquisition can't make a bad impression on every other powerful faction if they wish to be successful.



#94
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 491 messages

Howe's family has had power for generations and the Orlesians weren't doing anything out of the ordinary when they occupied Ferelden.  The Inquisition is a new (or at least, reborn) organization with no power of its own...  it wouldn't be easy for them to establish themselves if they become known for sadism and barbaric acts.

 

Maybe the Chantry wasn't a good example... I mean established groups that hold power in Thedas... the Inquisition can't make a bad impression on every other powerful faction if they wish to be successful.

It doesn't matter if peoples need you or have power you can get away with a lot and you are only guy that can save the day whether peoples like it or no.Of course it will make you enemies but same as supporting one group over another.LoL orlesians didn't do anything out of the ordinary good one...

 

Pretty much peoples have a lot tolerance for crap as Thedas isn't nice place for example guards were fine with vaughan party and even joined it.I doubt that peoples would care as long they aren't your victims and even then if you force them...  



#95
Icy Magebane

Icy Magebane
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages

It doesn't matter if peoples need you or have power you can get away with a lot and you are only guy that can save the day whether peoples like it or no.Of course it will make you enemies but same as supporting one group over another.LoL orlesians didn't do anything out of the ordinary good one...

 

Pretty much peoples have a lot tolerance for crap as Thedas isn't nice place for example guards were fine with vaughan party and even joined it.I doubt that peoples would care as long they aren't your victims and even then if you force them...  

The people are only going to take so much abuse before they start looking for an alternative to the Inquisitor...  there is no guarantee that the PC's intervention is the only way to resolve the crisis, and if the Inquisitor dies prematurely they are screwed without a backup plan.  Even if the Inquisitor is the most likely solution, no sane ruler would realistically place their fortunes in the hands of one person who could die from a stray arrow at any time... being Inquisitor doesn't give you a free pass to do what you want.

 

Also, soldiers follow the orders of people who already have power... any number of bandit chiefs could tell you how hard it is to start off with no power and gather a large group of people dedicated to murder, stealing, etc.  The Inquisition starts with no power, so why would warriors be eager to join them if they seem to be just another group of marauders?



#96
Shady Koala

Shady Koala
  • Members
  • 225 messages

Every single gamer has already killed hundreds upon thousands of enemies. Some just want to kill a few more, in creative ways.

 

I feel most just find being evil more fun than the standard real life moral bound good guy. (I know I do!) 

 

As for DAI, as long as the murder knife is back, I'm satisfied. 


  • Pierce Miller, Tevinter Rose, Chron0id et 2 autres aiment ceci

#97
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Yeah, but you get all the evil opportunities you want in DA, with siding with the templars and all.

 

Or you know siding with the walking carpet bombs that pass as people.



#98
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 491 messages

The people are only going to take so much abuse before they start looking for an alternative to the Inquisitor...  there is no guarantee that the PC's intervention is the only way to resolve the crisis, and if the Inquisitor dies prematurely they are screwed without a backup plan.  Even if the Inquisitor is the most likely solution, no sane ruler would realistically place their fortunes in the hands of one person who could die from a stray arrow at any time... being Inquisitor doesn't give you a free pass to do what you want.

 

Also, soldiers follow the orders of people who already have power... any number of bandit chiefs could tell you how hard it is to start off with no power and gather a large group of people dedicated to murder, stealing, etc.  The Inquisition starts with no power, so why would warriors be eager to join them if they seem to be just another group of marauders?

We know that inq is only guy that why random guy is leader.So sane ruler will screw themelves and chose to be destroyed by demons?As it was said by bio you can either go for diplomacy or go fight ,crush and force factions to follow you so you don't have to be nice to them and still expand your power you may force them.

"why would warriors be eager to join them if they seem to be just another group of marauders?"

As i said because we are only one who can fix the veil either me or have fun with demons.Add to that money and desire for power.    



#99
Icy Magebane

Icy Magebane
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages

We know that inq is only guy that why random guy is leader.So sane ruler will screw themelves and chose to be destroyed by demons?As it was said by bio you can either go for diplomacy or go fight ,crush and force factions to follow you so you don't have to be nice to them and still expand your power you may to force them.

"why would warriors be eager to join them if they seem to be just another group of marauders?"

As i said because we are only one who can fix the veil either me or have fun with demons.Add to that money and desire for power.    

Okay, so what if the Inquisitor dies on the battlefield before saving the world?  Everybody just sits around waiting to be killed by demons?  Don't you think that every nation would have scholars or mages trying to figure out a backup plan?  You don't think anyone would even try to come up with an alternative just in case the PC dies?

 

I mean, If the Inquisitor is that precious, maybe they shouldn't be on the front lines in the first place... maybe they could keep him inside a big metal box that they wheel up to the rift tears after clearing the area of hostiles.  They slide a little hatch open, Inquisitor sticks their hand out for a few seconds, and poof!  Problem solved.



#100
Pierce Miller

Pierce Miller
  • Members
  • 1 026 messages
Master Warder Z_, on 29 Jul 2014 - 01:17 AM, said:

Or you know siding with the walking carpet bombs that pass as people.

My spidey senses are tingling