I agree this is really strange I mean people really want to play freaking homicidal maniacs and hell even commit genocide if
the option would be given
Sure its a video game and I also like to play someone who doesn't take **** from anyone and is a very strict military leader BUT thats very different from the crazy things people want from this game
What I find even stranger is that they expect large numbers of soldiers to simply stand by while they do it. I don't care if people want to do things like this or not, but it makes no sense to ignore all logic and realism in favor of a sadistic power fantasy. At least some of the companions would revolt, all of the advisors would revolt, you'd lose all official support from both the Chantry and secular governments, and no less than half your soldiers would outright refuse to follow your commands... so how does any of this seem like a good idea?
This kind of stuff is really only suited to games where you are an individual or part of a very small group of dedicated, like-minded people... to expect the world to just sit back and watch, or for soldiers to even follow commands that wind up causing more damage than the demons is unreasonable.
This isn't a question of morality to me. I don't mind unethical behavior in a game, so long as the game responds realistically. We've had a lot of good, small-scale opportunities to commit evil acts in the past... anything beyond that is asking for way too much.