84 réponses à ce sujet

[SomeoneStoleMyName]

argh :/ Guess its extremely unlikely then. Thanks for responding atleast. 

https://www.youtube....h?v=EHk0ShaPo6Y 

This is the video of Petrice in act 3. She never died in my playthroughs
As for what I find appealing in her, she reminds me of this woman here:

[Lukas Trevelyan]

argh :/ Guess its extremely unlikely then. Thanks for responding atleast. 

https://www.youtube....h?v=EHk0ShaPo6Y 

This is the video of Petrice in act 3. She never died in my playthroughs
As for what I find appealing in her, she reminds me of this woman here:

Er if she was still in that chantry by Act 3, wouldn't she die in the explosion? 

[Former_Fiend]

Regardless of how many people killed her or worked with her, I'm just not seeing how she'd really factor into the game. 

 

If she succeeds in her plots with Hawke's assistance, she's presumably climbing the Chantry's hierarchy, but her storyline is tied to the qunari, and that storyline is hardly a factor in DAI at all as far as we know.

 

Besides, wouldn't she have been in the Chantry when Anders blew it up?

[SilkieBantam]

Pretty sure that as a sister of the Chantry, Peatrice would have taken a chastity vow. She also seems a bit too devout to break that. So I think you'd be out of luck even if she was alive. 

[Ynqve]

Er if she was still in that chantry by Act 3, wouldn't she die in the explosion? 

 

Let's hope so. She's a horrible, horrible person. If she died there, then well done Anders!

[Lukas Trevelyan]

Let's hope so. She's a horrible, horrible person. If she died there, then well done Anders!

But taking her side would make so much sense for my second Hawke's personality ;-;

[Ynqve]

But taking her side would make so much sense for my second Hawke's personality ;-;

 

Doesn't make her a good person I'm sure she's all sunshine and rainbows when you get to know her, but I hated her guts. 

[Master Warder Z_]

Besides, wouldn't she have been in the Chantry when Anders blew it up?

 

She was outside if she survived in Act 3.

 

And given how she could have been possibly disavowed or sent away (The Grand Cleric hints at this during the very quest people can possibly see her die) Even if she was sent from the Kirkwall Chantry however though i don't see much impact here for DAI.

 

That said it was nice to see someone with an appropriate reaction to those horned monsters.

[aTigerslunch]

I guess I never saved her.  She was never in any of my play throughs in Act 3, even with my vile, hateful mean Hawke, which wanted them dead anyways. That Hawke had everyone killable, killed.

[Former_Fiend]

She was outside if she survived in Act 3.

 

 

She has to sleep somewhere.

[Elite Midget]

It's too easy to get her killed and she was a pretty minor character. Heck, most don't even know you can even prevent her death because she doesn't do any favors in wanting to see her dead.

So you're into women who set you up, try to get you killed, attempt to start a war and kill an innocent boy?

 

Interesting.

....Isabela?

[metalfenix]

That woman have a very interesting tendency to die on each one of my DA 2 playthroughs.

[Urazz]

I think they've stated that on the whole people who could be dead would be dead but given her connections it would be interesting if she popped up for those people whose game didn't have her dead.    Would probably be part of some minor quest though.    I must admit I didn't know until this post that she could survive.

That and I think they would rather avoid any kind of hassle by doing minor cameos of characters that could end up dead after what they learned from DA:A and DA2.

[Samahl]

....Isabela?

 

Isabela doesn't do any of those things.

[Elite Midget]

Isabela doesn't do any of those things.

Isabela sets you up when she lies to you and runs off with the book.

 

Isabela sets you against the Qunari thus putting you in a situation that very much could get you killed as Hawke has no idea that the Arishok simply wants to capture them mostly intact. Isabela lying and keeping the book a secret also puts you in a lot of life and death situations.

 

Isabela does start a war in Kirkwall between the residents and the Qunari present. Had she never stolen the book or even tried to run off with it than things may not have went the way they did.

 

Isabela's hands aren't clean, she's killed plenty of innocents for profit and dabbled in slavery which does include children.

[SmilesJA]

Isabela sets you up when she lies to you and runs off with the book.

 

Isabela sets you against the Qunari thus putting you in a situation that very much could get you killed as Hawke has no idea that the Arishok simply wants to capture them mostly intact. Isabela lying and keeping the book a secret also puts you in a lot of life and death situations.

 

Isabela does start a war in Kirkwall between the residents and the Qunari present. Had she never stolen the book or even tried to run off with it than things may not have went the way they did.

 

Isabela's hands aren't clean, she's killed plenty of innocents for profit and dabbled in slavery which does include children.

 

Isabela didn't start the war, the Arishok did.

[Samahl]

Isabela sets you up when she lies to you and runs off with the book.

 

Isabela sets you against the Qunari thus putting you in a situation that very much could get you killed as Hawke has no idea that the Arishok simply wants to capture them mostly intact. Isabela lying and keeping the book a secret also puts you in a lot of life and death situations.

 

Isabela does start a war in Kirkwall between the residents and the Qunari present. Had she never stolen the book or even tried to run off with it than things may not have went the way they did.

 

Isabela's hands aren't clean, she's killed plenty of innocents for profit and dabbled in slavery which does include children.

 

In order for the post to be accurate, you have to modify it heavily:

 

So you're into women who set you up, try to almost gets you killed, attempt to indirectly starts a war and kills an innocent boy an indeterminate amount of people, some of which may have potentially been boys?

 

Interesting.

 

I'm not entirely sure about the "setting you up" bit, but I don't have any real argument for that, so I'll let that go. Also, Saemus was not a child.

[ButterRum]

argh :/ Guess its extremely unlikely then. Thanks for responding atleast. 

https://www.youtube....h?v=EHk0ShaPo6Y 

This is the video of Petrice in act 3. She never died in my playthroughs
As for what I find appealing in her, she reminds me of this woman here:

 

Sister Petrice? Petrice is pious and religious with not much motive behind her mischievous nature. Correct me if I'm wrong though, and I might have just sorely misread the character.

 

Personally, I find Anora to be more like Cersei, expect Gaider/BW handles Anora with much more respect than GRRM/HBO handles Cersei. Both Anora and Cersei are linked to the kingdom through their bloodlines, believe they deserve to be in their respective positions, and, most of all, want power as women.

 

The narration in DA at least shows Anora is capable of ruling Ferelden, and she believes she can do great things to Ferelden. The narration in GoT hits at every opportunity to show that Cersei is stupid or incapable of power. GRRM said her only redeeming quality is that she loves her children. Sighs...

 

I love Cersei, and she has all the right tools to be successful like Anora, but HBO/GRRM's one-sidedness of the character is frustrating and it makes her a frustrating character to root for. I WANT to root for her and I do root for her in the show, but she loses at every time pretty much.

 

Though there is no doubt that Cersei is petty character like Petrice is. So I see your point there.

[Former_Fiend]

Sister Petrice? Petrice is pious and religious with not much motive behind her mischievous nature. Correct me if I'm wrong though, and I might have just sorely misread the character.

 

Personally, I find Anora to be more like Cersei, expect Gaider/BW handles Anora with much more respect than GRRM/HBO handles Cersei. Both Anora and Cersei are linked to the kingdom through their bloodlines, believe they deserve to be in their respective positions, and, most of all, want power as women.

 

The narration in DA at least shows Anora is capable of ruling Ferelden, and she believes she can do great things to Ferelden. The narration in GoT hits at every opportunity to show that Cersei is stupid or incapable of power. GRRM said her only redeeming quality is that she loves her children. Sighs...

 

I love Cersei, and she has all the right tools to be successful like Anora, but HBO/GRRM's one-sidedness of the character is frustrating and it makes her a frustrating character to root for. I WANT to root for her and I do root for her in the show, but she loses at every time pretty much.

 

Though there is no doubt that Cersei is petty character like Petrice is. So I see your point there.

 

Her motive is religious zealotry. She believes that the very existence of the Qun is a challenge that the Chantry must answer and will do anything to motivate the faithful to war against the heathens. 

[Elite Midget]

 

In order for the post to be accurate, you have to modify it heavily:

 

 

 

I'm not entirely sure about the "setting you up" bit, but I don't have any real argument for that, so I'll let that go. Also, Saemus was not a child.

 

The intent was still there for ALL of those. Besides, Sister Petrice fails in setting you up or getting you killed.

 

Besides, Isabela knew that the Qunari wanted the Book back and would kill for it. She still ran and many lives were lost due to her selfishness.

 

Some WERE boys and girls, slaves includes those of all ages and she did deal with it. She even tossed slaves, of both genders and all ages, overboard to avoid authorities.

 

That man was barely a man, but no he was old enough to no longer be a child by the time of his death.

[ButterRum]

Some WERE boys and girls, slaves includes those of all ages and she did deal with it. She even tossed slaves, of both genders and all ages, overboard to avoid authorities.

 

 

Isabella is a reformed slaver and has since repented. Though awful, it wasn't a regular thing she did either. It was a one time thing ... lol.

[Elite Midget]

Isabella is a reformed slaver and has since repented. Though awful, it wasn't a regular thing she did either. It was a one time thing ... lol.

"I killed countless innocents for profit and tossed slaves overboard to their deaths but it's okay because I totally felt bad about it afterward... Eventually! Truly!"

 

Fact is that she still did those things and she does still set up Hawke and nearly gets Hawke killed multiple times throughout the game due to the Book she stole and her not only keeping it a secret for so long but even running with it after telling Hawke otherwise.

[ButterRum]

"I killed countless innocents for profit and tossed slaves overboard to their deaths but it's okay because I totally felt bad about it afterward... Eventually! Truly!"

 

Fact is that she still did those things and she does still set up Hawke and nearly gets Hawke killed multiple times throughout the game due to the Book she stole and her not only keeping it a secret for so long but even running with it after telling Hawke otherwise.

 

Not saying that it was okay. Just that it wasn't a perpetual thing she did, and it's not like she continually oppressed the elves like some leaders have done. 

 

In my game she came back with the book and gave it to the Quanari. 

[Elite Midget]

Giving back the Book doesn't bring back the countless lives lost due to the Qunari being there for so long. All of that loss is on Isabela's shoulders and she doesn't show any remorse or regret that she caused so much of it.

[Former_Fiend]

Giving back the Book doesn't bring back the countless lives lost due to the Qunari being there for so long. All of that loss is on Isabela's shoulders and she doesn't show any remorse or regret that she caused so much of it.

 

I think that's a pretty liberal use of the word "countless".