Aller au contenu

Photo

highest damage weapon? (math done)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
210 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Anarchy__

Anarchy__
  • Members
  • 729 messages

Sorry, can't take you serious with a wall of unreadable text.  Also, if you're trying to prove something to someone else, you can't leave out details, including where you're getting your information from, the formulas you used to get every variable, etc. I have no idea how far along you are in your engineering degree, but I work with plenty, both mechanical and software engineers, and they'll tell you being able to document and explain a concept is just as important as doing it. Come back with references (both on formulas and where you get 200 damage per pellet), some formatting, maybe a shorthand at the beginning with what variable are (what the hell is Vr, you never say), etc.  Keep in mind this is a multiplayer forum, not an engineering forum. Explain things like you're explaining them to a 5 year old. After you adjust all that, maybe then we can have an intelligent debate on if what you're claiming is correct or not.
 
Simply based on in game mechanics and usage, trying to use the Pirahna at 130 on a Human is just a silly idea. There are several dozen other methods of dealing better damage.

i never said what Vr, but in the next sentence i write what velocity ratio is, any idiot can make the link between the two. On that detail, yes i know, when i design wings wtc, right down to the nearest mm. But engineering is practicality, so you have no what to cut and what details to keep. I didbt post my maths because, one its a game forum, 2 any person wjo understands effiency can do the proper FULL maths and find the same results , and the 130 is supposed to be mm, so human piranha only best when that close

#52
DaryAlexV

DaryAlexV
  • Members
  • 199 messages

Claymore.

 

 

Also M8 Avenger is deadly on full auto. No kidding. 


  • bauzabauza et Fortack aiment ceci

#53
Lucky

Lucky
  • Members
  • 2 677 messages

Maybe you should stop trying to make complex posts from your phone.

 

Your spelling and formatting is so shitty that what your writing wouldn't make sense, even if you had you facts straight about the weapon's stats, which you don't...

 

https://docs.google....RnbGRDYnc#gid=8

 

Here ya go, maybe next time you'll actually get your basic stats about the weapon right at least.

 

By the way, you spelled Reegar wrong throughout all your posts.


  • Fortack aime ceci

#54
Lucky

Lucky
  • Members
  • 2 677 messages

Human Adept max damage with Piranha: http://kalence.drupa.....053384!.F...9

 

GI Piranha: http://kalence.drupa.....053314!5BGA.S

 

Man, what a revelation! We've all been such fools for not realizing that the human adept is the optimal kit for the piranha!!!


  • J. Peterman aime ceci

#55
FullSpe3D

FullSpe3D
  • Members
  • 476 messages

The OP is laughing at those trying to take his post seriously.


  • mrs_anomaly, Ribosome, Deerber et 1 autre aiment ceci

#56
DisturbedPsic0

DisturbedPsic0
  • Members
  • 1 126 messages

i never said what Vr, but in the next sentence i write what velocity ratio is, any idiot can make the link between the two. 

It's not the readers job to make assumptions, it's the writers job to make everything clear.

Edit: Also it's good writing practice to say the long hand before the shorthand. For example, "In order to find the velocity ratio, or Vr, you must....blah blah blah". Then from there on out you can use Vr because you've told the reader what it means. It's basic writing.

 

 

I didbt post my maths because, one its a game forum, 2 any person wjo understands effiency can do the proper FULL maths and find the same results 

Again, not an engineering forum, Why would you assume people here would know formulas and whatever math you did. Also, if people could do that, don't you think we already know the best weapons?

 

 

and the 130 is supposed to be mm, so human piranha only best when that close

You didn't write mm, you wrote m, a very big difference. Why wouldn't you fix that in your original post? Secondly, do you ever clarify as to why human? Because other classes have better accuracy, stability, and damage passives.



#57
Ribosome

Ribosome
  • Members
  • 1 925 messages
Keep going, everyone. I'm sure you'll get your victory against the OP with enough argument no you won't
  • capn233, FullSpe3D, Pearl (rip bioware) et 2 autres aiment ceci

#58
codsquallic

codsquallic
  • Members
  • 730 messages

Who doesn't love a good maths story!



#59
Cyonan

Cyonan
  • Members
  • 19 354 messages

Obviously the most efficient weapons are anything designed by the Quarians, because Quarians = awesome.

 

I had an equals sign in there, so you know it's totally 100% legit maths.


  • bauzabauza, sithren, KrrKs et 7 autres aiment ceci

#60
ajscott819

ajscott819
  • Members
  • 559 messages

Gonna agree with DisturbedPsic0. You would find less arguements and denials if you presented your case in a more clear and concise manner.

It doesn't help that you leave out details, mislabeled your units of measure, and used incorrect data.

 

It does make for a humorous read though.



#61
NuclearTech76

NuclearTech76
  • Members
  • 16 229 messages

Please elaborate on the frictional differentials between doggiestyle and ahem reverse cowgirl position, OP.


  • Deerber et Pearl (rip bioware) aiment ceci

#62
Ashevajak

Ashevajak
  • Members
  • 2 562 messages

This topic is the perfect example of "not even wrong" in action.



#63
Marksmad is waving goodbye

Marksmad is waving goodbye
  • Members
  • 7 849 messages

Not dense, people are trying to argue aeronautical engineering with their highschool engineering knowledge.

 

LOL @ highschool engineering knowledge.

 

Dude, time for you to eat the fruit of the clue tree. There are plenty of people here who can effortlessly understand the most complex calculations that you can produce.

 

Give it your best shot.

 

Keep going, everyone. I'm sure you'll get your victory against the OP with enough argument no you won't

 

But if we gave up, that would mean that somebody would be WRONG ON THE INTERNET!



#64
Nethershadow

Nethershadow
  • Members
  • 297 messages

i never said what Vr, but in the next sentence i write what velocity ratio is, any idiot can make the link between the two. On that detail, yes i know, when i design wings wtc, right down to the nearest mm. But engineering is practicality, so you have no what to cut and what details to keep. I didbt post my maths because, one its a game forum, 2 any person wjo understands effiency can do the proper FULL maths and find the same results , and the 130 is supposed to be mm, so human piranha only best when that close

Come on now, name drop who you really work for. Toys R Us? Slim Shady's Engineering Co? McDonald's?

 

Hey, i know what your thinking, is it really worth increasing the bun size to make it bigger at the cost of increasing it's drag speed which requires the average person to be slightly stronger as well take longer to lift the burger to your mouth x multiple passes required?

 

We all know Lockheed only hires professionals that know how to document and submit a report, because they fired or more likely just didn't hire you if you submitted it like what's on the front page.

 

I'm not sure what you call that OP but it most definitely doesn't make any sense.

 

Oh ya, and since we are talking about hamburgers, I'm going to reference them as hotdogs, because you know, potAto potato, it's all the same right?


  • robarcool aime ceci

#65
robarcool

robarcool
  • Members
  • 6 608 messages

What do you mean diagram? Ill try explain better in laments term.

We all lament that this thread existed


  • mrs_anomaly, sithren, Shinobu et 3 autres aiment ceci

#66
NuclearTech76

NuclearTech76
  • Members
  • 16 229 messages

LOL @ highschool engineering knowledge.

 

Dude, time for you to eat the fruit of the clue tree. There are plenty of people here who can effortlessly understand the most complex calculations that you can produce.

 

Give it your best shot.

 

 

But if we gave up, that would mean that somebody would be WRONG ON THE INTERNET!

Give a complete example of a quantum gauge theory in four-dimensional space-time. ;) 

 

See ya in bout 50 years.  :lol: 



#67
bauzabauza

bauzabauza
  • Members
  • 1 098 messages

G.I. + harrier + space magic :wizard: is the way



#68
Marksmad is waving goodbye

Marksmad is waving goodbye
  • Members
  • 7 849 messages

Give a complete example of a quantum gauge theory in four-dimensional space-time. ;) 

 

See ya in bout 50 years.  :lol: 

 

You should set this as a task for the OP. I've been there and done that.

 

The exact dimensionality has little effect on the structure of a gauge theory. And very few people bother with the quantum form of the entire theory(*) because they really only want to know what particles fall out with which masses, so the group algebra normally suffices.

 

If you want to understand the dynamics of the theory then a lot of it is in the classical (tree graph) level and one can normally estimate the loop corrections most easily.

 

(*) And because renormalisation is a tough enough process that almost anything is worth avoiding it.

 

PS  Or am I making this all up and it's just a test?

 

PPS The regular forum idiot will be along shortly to make an asinine remark about nerdiness, as if being on a video game forum doesn't implicate them as well.



#69
Seraphiene

Seraphiene
  • Members
  • 329 messages

OK.... Wait.... WUT? 

2cx6slh.jpg

 

 



#70
Guest_Chino_*

Guest_Chino_*
  • Guests
Firstly, OP, it's good to see your triumphant trolling return. Secondly, I could divide by zero and my math would still make more sense than yours.
  • Zig et Deerber aiment ceci

#71
Marksmad is waving goodbye

Marksmad is waving goodbye
  • Members
  • 7 849 messages

OK.... Wait.... WUT? 

2cx6slh.jpg

 

That's just what I learned in primary school. Once I got to high school they started us on the advanced stuff.

 

Now we need someone really smart to define a spontaneously symmetry-broken and fully covariant gauge theory of ME3 multiplayer. Ideally, it should explain why the RNG store works the way it does.



#72
crashsuit

crashsuit
  • Members
  • 2 140 messages
Excellent troll thread. The seriousness of the responses is what really makes it.

#73
Pearl (rip bioware)

Pearl (rip bioware)
  • Members
  • 7 294 messages
I love it when people take Anarchy seriously.

#74
Marksmad is waving goodbye

Marksmad is waving goodbye
  • Members
  • 7 849 messages

Excellent troll thread. The seriousness of the responses is what really makes it.

 

There's a serious response? I don't see it.

 

I love it when people take Anarchy seriously.

 

What a wonderful quote. I'll call Homeland Security.



#75
FullSpe3D

FullSpe3D
  • Members
  • 476 messages

I do find it quite funny that it took 3 pages to establish that the Piranha works best at point blank range.