My natural inclination is to always choose the diplomatic method, but there may be plenty of situations where it seems like intrigue or military would handle a problem best, and in those situations I will not choose diplomacy. I really think that one should just handle each situation as it arises.
Consider the suicide mission at the end of ME2 (concerning which this paragraph will, of course, contain spoilers - for the dozen people in this forum who haven't played it). If you'd decided that you were going to give Miranda (random example!) every specialized task that allowed her as an option, just because you liked her most and felt sure that she would always give the best outcome, you would end up making a mistake. Miranda says she can handle the biotic bubble, but she can't; she's not speaking objectively. Someone making the decision with a wider sense which team member is strongest in each area would, in my opinion, choose Samara or Jack, and thus keep everyone alive.
In a similar way, I think that deciding in advance what one is going to do in DA:I is a mistake. We really don't know much about the game (or, at least, I've tried to avoid most spoilers, especially that tantalizing leaked achievements thread). Only what is revealed as we play can inform us as to what the best response will be.





Retour en haut







